The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Solid-State Cavity-Quantum Electrodynamics with Self-Assembled Quantum Dots
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In a realistic scenario, where absorption, scattering and coupling losses degrade the quality factor of the microcavity [286,287], both the materials and the preparation techniques used for Bragg stacks become decisive and strongly influence the value of Q.”
From Metal Oxide Thin Films for Advanced Photonic Applications (2026) · cites this paper as [286]
Citations
Cites
Controlled atomic spontaneous emission from Er3+ in a transparent Si/ SiO2 microcavity
Vredenberg, A. M., Hunt, N. E. J., Schubert, E. F., Jacobson, D. C., Poate, J. M., & ZYDZIK, G. J. (1993) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.71.517 · Cited by 186
A single-mode solid-state source of single photons based on isolated quantum dots in a micropillar
Moreau, E., Robert-Philip, I., Manin, L., Thierry-Mieg, V., Gérard, J., & Abram, I. I. (2002) · Physica E Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures · doi:10.1016/s1386-9477(02)00157-1 · Cited by 42
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Metal Oxide Thin Films for Advanced Photonic Applications
Stîngescu, M.-L., Șopronyi, M.-A., Antohe, Ș., & Scărișoreanu, N.-D. (2026) · Crystals · doi:10.3390/cryst16030164 · Cited by 2
“In a realistic scenario, where absorption, scattering and coupling losses degrade the quality factor of the microcavity [286,287], both the materials and the preparation techniques used for Bragg stacks become decisive and strongly influence the value of Q.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Gérard, J.-M.
- Affiliations
- Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Gérard, Jean-Michel
- ORCID
- Gérard, Jean-Michel
- Venue
- Topics in Applied Physics
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2003-11-04
- Pages
- 269-314
- ISSN
- 0303-4216 (ISSN-L)
- 1437-0859
- OpenAlex
- W2506220669
- Cited by
- 128
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 16.49
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Topics in applied physics (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Strong Light-Matter Interactions
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Semiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices
- Keywords
- cavity quantum electrodynamics, self-assembled quantum dots, semiconductor microcavities, Purcell effect, spontaneous emission enhancement, pillar microcavities, strong coupling, artificial atoms
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
