A Review of Mobile HCI Research Methods
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Usability of mobile applications: literature review and rationale for a new usability model
Harrison, R., Flood, D., & Duce, D. (2013) · Journal of Interaction Science · doi:10.1186/2194-0827-1-1 · Cited by 736 · see citing works
Usability evaluation of mobile applications using ISO 9241 and ISO 25062 standards
Moumane, K., Idri, A., & Abran, A. (2016) · SpringerPlus · doi:10.1186/s40064-016-2171-z · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Exiting the Cleanroom: On Ecological Validity and Ubiquitous Computing
Carter, S., Mankoff, J., Klemmer, S. R., & Matthews, T. (2008) · Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/07370020701851086 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Removal as a Method: A Fourth Wave HCI Approach to Understanding the Experience of Self-Tracking
Homewood, S., Karlsson, A., & Vallgårda, A. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference · doi:10.1145/3357236.3395425 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Schneider, H., Moser, K., Butz, A., & Alt, F. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2858036.2858290 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Jensen, K. L., & Larsen, L. B. (2007) · Proceedings of the 4th international conference on mobile technology, applications, and systems and the 1st international symposium on Computer human interaction in mobile technology · doi:10.1145/1378063.1378177 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kjeldskov, J., & Graham, C.
- Affiliations
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- ORCID
- Kjeldskov, Jesper
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2003
- Pages
- 317-335
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- 1611-3349
- OpenAlex
- W1492397400
- Cited by
- 375
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 29
- FWCI
- 18.68
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
- VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Interactive and Immersive Displays
- Keywords
- mobile human-computer interaction, research methodology, research trends, action research, fieldwork, case studies, cumulative knowledge
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
