The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Perception of Speech and Sound
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Auditory Icons may require less cognitive processing and be more accessible than computer-synthesized speech, especially for users with hearing loss [40].”
From An investigation into the effectiveness of using acoustic touch to assist people who are blind (2023) · cites this paper as [40]
Citations
Cites
Speech Recognition with Primarily Temporal Cues
Shannon, R., Zeng, F.-G., Kamath, V., Wygonski, J., & Ekelid, M. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.270.5234.303 · Cited by 3,302
Psychoacoustics: facts and models
Fastl, H., & Zwicker, E. (1991) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-5706 · Cited by 2,406
Nilsson, M., Soli, S. D., & Sullivan, J. A. (1994) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.408469 · Cited by 2,078
An Analysis of Perceptual Confusions Among Some English Consonants
Miller, G. A., & Nicely, P. E. (1955) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1907526 · Cited by 1,869
Carterette, E. C., & Friedman, M. P. (1977) · Optometry and Vision Science · doi:10.1097/00006324-197710000-00013 · Cited by 1,571
Preliminaries to Speech Analysis: The Distinctive Features and Their Correlates
Garvin, P. L., Jakobson, R., Gunnar, C., Fant, M., & Halle, M. (1953) · Language · doi:10.2307/409957 · Cited by 1,158
Factors Governing the Intelligibility of Speech Sounds
French, N. R., & Steinberg, J. C. (1947) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1916407 · Cited by 1,131
Bronkhorst, A. W. (2000) · TNO Repository · Cited by 799
Critical Band Width in Loudness Summation
Zwicker, E., Flottorp, G., & Stevens, S. S. (1957) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1908963 · Cited by 740
Improving the Reliability of Testing the Speech Reception Threshold for Sentences
Plomp, R., & Mimpen, A. M. (1979) · International Journal of Audiology · doi:10.3109/00206097909072618 · Cited by 722
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- K. Wagener, V. Kühnel, B. Kollmeier: Entwicklung und Evaluation eines Satztests für die deutsche Sprache I: Design des Oldenburger Satztests (Development and evaluation of a German sentence test I: Design of the Oldenburg sentence test), Zeitschrift für Audiologie 38, 4-15 (1999)
- ANSI: Methods for the calculation of the articulation index, ANSI S3.5-1969 (American National Standards Institute, New York 1969)
- ANSI: Methods for calculation of the speech intelligibility index, ANSI S3.5-1997 (American National Standards Institute, New York 1997)
- IEC: Sound system equipment - Part 16: Objective rating of speech intelligibility by speech transmission index. INTERNATIONAL STANDARD 60268-16 Second edition 1998-03 (1998)
- M. Kleinschmidt: Methods for capturing spectro-temporal modulations in automatic speech recognition, Acustica united with Acta Acustica 88(3), 416-422 (2002)
Cited by
Adaptation in the auditory system: an overview
Pérez‐González, D., & Malmierca, M. S. (2014) · Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnint.2014.00019 · Cited by 191
Speech Recognition in Natural Background Noise
Meyer, J., Dentel, L., & Meunier, F. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0079279 · Cited by 83
The Tonal Space of Contrastive Five Level Tones
Kuang, J. (2013) · Phonetica · doi:10.1159/000353853 · Cited by 71
(2018) · Springer Series on Touch and Haptic Systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-58316-7 · Cited by 60
“Generally speaking, the Ruffini corpuscle is very hard to identify and direct observations are rare, even in glabrous skin [12, 31].”
BackgroundInfluentialKügler, F., & Féry, C. (2016) · Language and Speech · doi:10.1177/0023830916647204 · Cited by 50
Metadata
- Authors
- Kollmeier, B., Brand, T., & Meyer, B.
- Affiliations
- Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Brand, Thomas
- Meyer, Bernd
- Venue
- Springer Handbooks
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2008
- Pages
- 61-82
- ISSN
- 2522-8692 (ISSN-L)
- 2522-8706
- OpenAlex
- W191749596
- Cited by
- 56
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 0.64
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Springer handbooks (publishedVersion)
- Publikationsdatenbank der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion)
- Fraunhofer-Publica (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
- Keywords
- speech perception, auditory perception, loudness, spectral masking, temporal masking, amplitude modulation, binaural hearing, interaural time difference, interaural level difference, binaural unmasking, articulation index, speech transmission index, speech intelligibility index, speech features, speech recognition (audiology), human-machine comparison, auditory signal processing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.