The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Process Flexibility: A Survey of Contemporary Approaches
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
YAWL: yet another workflow language
van der Aalst, W. M. P., & ter Hofstede, A. H. M. (2004) · Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.is.2004.02.002 · Cited by 1,442
Adeptflex—Supporting Dynamic Changes of Workflows Without Losing Control
Reichert, M., & Dadam, P. (1998) · Journal of Intelligent Information Systems · doi:10.1023/a:1008604709862 · Cited by 887
Case handling: a new paradigm for business process support
van der Aalst, W. M. P., Weske, M., & Grünbauer, D. (2004) · Data & Knowledge Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.datak.2004.07.003 · Cited by 784
(2008) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-78238-4 · Cited by 761
Worklets: A Service-Oriented Implementation of Dynamic Flexibility in Workflows
Adams, M., ter Hofstede, A. H. M., Edmond, D., & van der Aalst, W. M. P. (2006) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/11914853_18 · Cited by 266
Self-citationDealing with workflow change: identification of issues and solutions
van der Aalst, W. M. P., & Jablonski, S. (2000) · TU/e Research Portal · Cited by 247
Dynamic, Extensible and Context-Aware Exception Handling for Workflows
Adams, M., ter Hofstede, A. H. M., van der Aalst, W. M. P., & Edmond, D. (2007) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-76848-7_8 · Cited by 98
A benchmarking framework for methods to design flexible business processes
Daoudi, F., & Nurcan, S. (2006) · Software Process Improvement and Practice · doi:10.1002/spip.304 · Cited by 47
On the architecture and form of flexible process support
Snowdon, R. A., Warboys, B., Greenwood, R. M., Holland, C. P., Kawalek, P., & Shaw, D. (2006) · Software Process Improvement and Practice · doi:10.1002/spip.307 · Cited by 38
Evaluating flexible workflow systems
Carlsen, S., Krogstie, J., Sølvberg, A., & Lindland, O. I. (2002) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.1109/hicss.1997.665502 · Cited by 28
Cited by
Gong, Y., Yang, J., & Shi, X. (2020) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2020.101487 · Cited by 301
Wanna improve process mining results?
Bose, R. P. J. C., Mans, R. S., & van der Aalst, W. M. P. (2013) · 2013 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Data Mining (CIDM) · doi:10.1109/cidm.2013.6597227 · Cited by 192
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Schonenberg, H., Mans, R., Russell, N., Mulyar, N., & van der Aalst, W.
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2008
- Pages
- 16-30
- ISSN
- 1865-1348 (ISSN-L)
- 1865-1356
- OpenAlex
- W1531493594
- Cited by
- 298
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 28.58
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Process Flexibility: A Survey of Contemporary Approaches. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-3-540-68644-6_2
- The paper
- Schonenberg, H., Mans, R., Russell, N., Mulyar, N., & van der Aalst, W. (2008). Process Flexibility: A Survey of Contemporary Approaches. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68644-6_2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
