Cited by 192Business Process Modeling and AnalysisData Mining Algorithms and ApplicationsSoftware Testing and Debugging Techniques

Wanna improve process mining results?

Bose, R.P. Jagadeesh Chandra, Mans, Ronny S., van der Aalst, Wil M.P.·2013·2013 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Data Mining (CIDM)

Abstract

The growing interest in process mining is fueled by the increasing availability of event data. Process mining techniques use event logs to automatically discover process models, check conformance, identify bottlenecks and deviations, suggest improvements, and predict processing times. Lion's share of process mining research has been devoted to analysis techniques. However, the proper handling of problems and challenges arising in analyzing event logs used as input is critical for the success of any process mining effort. In this paper, we identify four categories of process characteristics issues that may manifest in an event log (e.g. process problems related to event granularity and case heterogeneity) and 27 classes of event log quality issues (e.g., problems related to timestamps in event logs, imprecise activity names, and missing events). The systematic identification and analysis of these issues calls for a consolidated effort from the process mining community. Five real-life event logs are analyzed to illustrate the omnipresence of process and event log issues. We hope that these findings will encourage systematic logging approaches (to prevent event log issues), repair techniques (to alleviate event log issues) and analysis techniques (to deal with the manifestation of process characteristics in event logs).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cidm.2013.6597227

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 54 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bose, R. P. J. C., Mans, R. S., & van der Aalst, W. M. P.
Affiliations
Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
Venue
2013 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Data Mining (CIDM)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2013-04
Pages
127-134
OpenAlex
W2092898466
Cited by
192
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
13.65
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Data Mining (CIDM) (publishedVersion)
  • TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
  • Stichting voor de Technische Wetenschappen
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Business Process Modeling and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Data Mining Algorithms and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
Keywords
process mining, event logs, timestamps, process characteristics, process discovery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review