Natural Interaction between Avatars and Persons with Alzheimer’s Disease
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the last 10 years, few studies have addressed the use of ECAs among older adults with dementia.
“In fact, in the last 10 years, few studies have addressed the use of ECAs among older adults with dementia.”
This framework of 4 weeks of interaction between 20 seniors with dementia and the agent Anne in a home setting is rare in ECA research, which mainly comprises studies on short-term interaction in a controlled environment and smaller sample size enrollment.
“This framework is rare in ECA research, which mainly comprises studies on short-term interaction in a controlled environment [13] and smaller sample size enrollment [7-12].”
The quality of automatic speech recognition and synthesis is still a technical issue and has room for improvement, whereas touch screen modality is almost stable and positively used by people living with dementia.
“Unfortunately, our study confirms that the quality of automatic speech recognition and synthesis is still a technical issue and has room for improvement [7-11], whereas touch screen modality is almost stable and positively used by people living with dementia [3,25,26].”
This study mapped how the readiness level of ECA-based interventions grew across the years, shifting from a display on standard television sets and computer screens to mobile stand-alone solutions such as Anne.
“From a technical point of view, this study mapped how the readiness level of ECA-based interventions grew across the years, shifting from a display on standard television sets [7] and computer screens [8-12] to mobile stand-alone solutions such as in the specific case of Anne.”
Carrasco et al. conducted the first work in which people with dementia actually interacted with an ECA, by pressing buttons (green for 'yes' and red for 'no') on a remote control.
“Carrasco et al. conducted the first work in which people with dementia actually interacted with an ECA, by pressing buttons (green for 'yes' and red for 'no') on a remote control [6].”
From Usability assessment of interaction management support in LOUISE, an ECA-based user interface for elders with cognitive impairment (2018) · cites this paper as [6]
The current literature on the use of ECAs by older adults with cognitive impairment does not provide many guidelines for adapting ECA technology for this public.
“However, the current literature on the use of ECAs by older adults with cognitive impairment does not provide many guidelines for adapting ECA technology for this public.”
From Usability assessment of interaction management support in LOUISE, an ECA-based user interface for elders with cognitive impairment (2018) · cites this paper as [6]
ECAs have advantages over other kinds of interfaces: naturalness, higher levels of attention, easy understanding, believability, higher motivation, and effectiveness.
“The aforementioned authors have identified the following advantages of ECAs over other kinds of interfaces: naturalness [11, 5, 6], higher levels of attention [10, 11, 5], easy understanding [11, 5], believability [10, 11], higher motivation [10, 12, 13] and effectiveness [10, 11, 5].”
From Usability assessment of interaction management support in LOUISE, an ECA-based user interface for elders with cognitive impairment (2018) · cites this paper as [6]
The use of ECAs could improve the accessibility and acceptance of computer-based assistive technologies, compared to graphical user interfaces and voice interfaces, especially for older adults with cognitive impairment.
“Globally, current results [10, 11, 5, 6, 12] lead to the conclusion that the use of ECAs could improve the accessibility and acceptance of computer-based assistive technologies, compared to graphical user interfaces and voice interfaces, especially for older adults with cognitive impairment.”
From Usability assessment of interaction management support in LOUISE, an ECA-based user interface for elders with cognitive impairment (2018) · cites this paper as [6]
Several researchers have proposed to use virtual humanoid characters, called ECAs, that are able to interact with a person through verbal and nonverbal communication.
“To do this, several researchers [5, 6, 7, 8, 9] have proposed to use virtual humanoid characters, called Embodied Conversational Agents (ECAs), that are able to interact with a person through verbal and nonverbal communication.”
From Usability assessment of interaction management support in LOUISE, an ECA-based user interface for elders with cognitive impairment (2018) · cites this paper as [6]
People with MCI or dementia successfully interacted with ECAs, whether through remote control button presses or social-like interaction.
“Lastly, the authors we cited above showed that people with MCI or dementia successfully interacted with ECAs, whether through remote control button presses or social-like interaction.”
From Field evaluation with cognitively-impaired older adults of attention management in the Embodied Conversational Agent Louise (2016) · cites this paper as [10]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 27 · Cited by 27
- Authors
- Carrasco, E., Epelde, G., Moreno, A., Ortiz, A., Garcia, I., Buiza, C., Urdaneta, E., Etxaniz, A., González, M. F., & Arruti, A.
- Affiliations
- Vicomtech (ES)
- University of the Basque Country (ES)
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2008
- Pages
- 38-45
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- 1611-3349
- OpenAlex
- W1674981298
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 4.80
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
- Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
- Keywords
- Alzheimer's disease, avatars, virtual assistants, natural human-computer interaction, cognitive impairment, television remote control, assistive technology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review