Cited by 27Social Robot Interaction and HRISpeech and dialogue systemsTechnology Use by Older Adults

Natural Interaction between Avatars and Persons with Alzheimer’s Disease

Carrasco, Eduardo, Epelde, Gorka, Moreno, Aitor, Ortiz, Amalia, Garcia, Igor, Buiza, Cristina, Urdaneta, Elena, Etxaniz, Aitziber +2 more·2008·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-540-70540-6_5

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 27 · Cited by 27

Authors
Carrasco, E., Epelde, G., Moreno, A., Ortiz, A., Garcia, I., Buiza, C., Urdaneta, E., Etxaniz, A., González, M. F., & Arruti, A.
Affiliations
  • Vicomtech (ES)
  • University of the Basque Country (ES)
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2008
Pages
38-45
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W1674981298
Cited by
27
References
27
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3
FWCI
4.80
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, avatars, virtual assistants, natural human-computer interaction, cognitive impairment, television remote control, assistive technology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review