Gaze-X: Adaptive, Affective, Multimodal Interface for Single-User Office Scenarios
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
AFER, usually combined with speech, gaze and standard interactions like mouse movements and keystrokes, can be used to build adaptive environments by detecting the user's affective states.
“AFER, usually combined with speech, gaze and standard interactions like mouse movements and keystrokes can be used to build adaptive environments by detecting the user’s affective states [39], [40].”
From Survey on RGB, 3D, Thermal, and Multimodal Approaches for Facial Expression Recognition: History, Trends, and Affect-Related Applications (2016) · cites this paper as [40]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Picard, R. W. (1997) · MIT Press · doi:10.7551/mitpress/1140.001.0001 · Cited by 7,382 · see citing works
Affective multimodal human-computer interaction
Pantic, M., Sebe, N., Cohn, J. F., & Huang, T. (2005) · Proceedings of the 13th annual ACM international conference on Multimedia · doi:10.1145/1101149.1101299 · Cited by 234 · see citing works
Affect Recognition from Face and Body: Early Fusion vs. Late Fusion
Gunes, H., & Piccardi, M. (2006) · 2005 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/icsmc.2005.1571679 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Lisetti, C. L., & Schiano, D. J. (2000) · Pragmatics & Cognition · doi:10.1075/pc.8.1.09lis · Cited by 189 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Corneanu, C. A., Simon, M. O., Cohn, J. F., & Guerrero, S. E. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2016.2515606 · Cited by 527 · see citing works
Machine Analysis of Facial Expressions
Pantic, M., & Stewart, M. (2007) · Face Recognition · doi:10.5772/4847 · Cited by 248 · see citing works
Self-citationA survey of affect recognition methods: audio, visual and spontaneous expressions
Zeng, Z., Pantic, M., Roisman, G. I., & Huang, T. S. (2007) · Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Multimodal interfaces · doi:10.1145/1322192.1322216 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
- Authors
- Maat, L., & Pantic, M.
- Affiliations
- Delft University of Technology (NL)
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2007-07-16
- Pages
- 251-271
- OpenAlex
- W2654737488
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 4.72
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Keywords
- affective computing, multimodal human-computer interaction, adaptive user interfaces, gaze, facial expression recognition, speech recognition, keystroke dynamics, mouse movement, user modeling, emotion modeling, usability evaluation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
