Cited by 234Emotion and Mood RecognitionSocial Robot Interaction and HRIInnovative Human-Technology Interaction

Affective multimodal human-computer interaction

Pantic, Maja, Sebe, Nicu, Cohn, Jeffrey F., Huang, Thomas·2005·Proceedings of the 13th annual ACM international conference on Multimedia

Abstract

Social and emotional intelligence are aspects of human intelligence that have been argued to be better predictors than IQ for measuring aspects of success in life, especially in social interactions, learning, and adapting to what is important. When it comes to machines, not all of them will need such skills. Yet to have machines like computers, broadcast systems, and cars, capable of adapting to their users and of anticipating their wishes, endowing them with the ability to recognize user's affective states is necessary. This article discusses the components of human affect, how they might be integrated into computers, and how far are we from realizing affective multimodal human-computer interaction.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/1101149.1101299

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous facial emotion recognition software primarily dealt with offline emotion recognition that causes post-processing of the learner's data.

    “Previous software primarily dealt with offline emotion recognition that cause post-processing of the learner's data.”

    From Towards multimodal emotion recognition in e-learning environments (2016) · cites this paper as Pantic, Sebe, Cohn, & Huang, 2005

  • Previous facial emotion recognition software can only manage a small set of expressions from frontal view faces without facial hair or glasses, provided that there is constant illumination.

    “The application context is restricted by the fact that such software can only manage a small set of expressions from frontal view faces without facial hair, glasses provided that there is constant illumination.”

    From Towards multimodal emotion recognition in e-learning environments (2016) · cites this paper as Pantic, Sebe, Cohn, & Huang, 2005

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pantic, M., Sebe, N., Cohn, J. F., & Huang, T.
Affiliations
  • Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 13th annual ACM international conference on Multimedia
Publisher
ACM
Published
2005-11-06
Pages
669-676
OpenAlex
W2028975938
Cited by
234
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 8
FWCI
25.50
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • ACM International Conference on Multimedia (ACM MM) (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System (Università degli Studi di Trento) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Keywords
affective computing, multimodal human-computer interaction, affective states, social-emotional intelligence, user modeling, adaptive systems, emotion recognition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review