Intuitive Use of User Interfaces: Defining a Vague Concept
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Prior experience and familiarity have been identified as the main factors for intuitive use.
“Over the past years this definition has been supported by several experimental designs (Blackler et al., 2010b;Hurtienne and Blessing, 2007;Naumann et al., 2007) where prior experience and familiarity have been identified as the main factors for intuitive use.”
From Intuitive Learnability of Touch Gestures for Technology-Naive Older Adults (2015) · cites this paper as Naumann et al., 2007
Cites
Getting a grip on tangible interaction: a framework on physical space and social interaction
Hornecker, E., & Buur, J. (2006) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/1124772.1124838 · Cited by 1,100 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Benchmarks for intuitive interaction with mobile devices
Naumann, A., & Hurtienne, J. (2010) · Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Human computer interaction with mobile devices and services · doi:10.1145/1851600.1851685 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Self-citationIntuitive Learnability of Touch Gestures for Technology-Naive Older Adults
Mihajlov, M., Law, E. L.-C., & Springett, M. (2015) · Interacting with Computers · doi:10.1093/iwc/iwu044 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
- Authors
- Naumann, A., Hurtienne, J., Israel, J. H., Mohs, C., Kindsmüller, M. C., Meyer, H. A., & Hußlein, S.
- Affiliations
- Technische Universität Berlin (DE)
- Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
- University of Lübeck (DE)
- University of Applied Sciences Potsdam (DE)
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2007
- Pages
- 128-136
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- 1611-3349
- OpenAlex
- W1600374441
- Cited by
- 93
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 3.54
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Interactive and Immersive Displays
- Keywords
- human-machine interaction, intuition, technical system design, interaction effectiveness, aesthetics, user interface design
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
