Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,099

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Introduction to Software Architecture

·2009·Advanced Topics in Science and Technology in China

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-540-74343-9_1

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Bass, L., Clements, P. & Kazman, R. Software Architecture in Practice, 2nd ed.: Addison-Wesley/Pearson. 2003.
  2. Bosch, J. Design and Use of Software Architecture: Adopting and Evolving a Product Line Approach: Addison-Wesley. 2000.
  3. Brooks, F. P. The Mythical Man-Month: Essays on Software Engineering: Addison-Wesley. 1975. · DOI
  4. Clements, P. & Northrop, L. Software Product Lines: Practices and Patterns: Addison-Wesley. 2002.
  5. Clements, P., Bachmann, F. & Bass, L. Documenting Software Architectures: Views and Beyond Addison Wesley/Pearson. 2003a. · DOI
  6. Clements, P., Kazman, R. & Klein, M. Evaluating Software Architectures: Methods and Case Studies: Pearson Education. 2003b.
  7. Dijkstra, E. W. The Structure of the “THE” Multiprogramming System. Communications of the ACM 1968a(18). · doi:10.1145/800001.811672
  8. Dijkstra, E. W. Goto Statement Considered Harmful. Communications of the ACM 1968b(11): 147–148. · DOI · Paper page
  9. Fuggetta, A., Picco, G. P. & Vigna, G. Understanding Code Mobility. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 1998(24): 342–361. · DOI · Paper page
  10. Gacek, C., et al. On the Definition of Software System Architecture. Proceeding of the 1st International Workshop on Architectures for Software Systems, New York.1995:85–95.
  11. IEEE. IEEE Standard for a Software Quality Metrics Methodology. 1998.
  12. Kazman, R., et al. Saam: A Method for Analyzing the Properties of Software Architectures. Proceedings of 16th International Conference on Software Engineering, Sorrento, Italy.1994:81–90. · DOI · Paper page
  13. Kruchten, P., Obbink, H. & Stafford, J. The Past, Present, and Future of Software Architecture. IEEE Software, 2006(23): 22–30. · DOI · Paper page
  14. Kruchten, P. B. The 4+1 View Model of Architecture. Software, IEEE, 1995(12): 42–50. · DOI · Paper page
  15. Mei, H., Chang, J. & Yang, F. Software Component Composition Based on Adl and Middleware. Science in China (F) 2001(44): 136–151.
  16. Ning, J. Q. A Component-Based Software Development Model. Proceedings. The Twentieth Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC’ 96) (Cat. No.96CB35986) 1996(389–394). · doi:10.1109/cmpsac.1996.544597
  17. Parnas, D. L. On the Criteria for Decomposing Systems into Modules. Communications of the ACM 1972(15): 1053–1058. · DOI · Paper page
  18. Parnas, D. L. On a “Buzzword“: Hierarchical Structure. Proceeding of lFIP Congress 1974, Amsterdam, North Holland.1974:336–339.
  19. Parnas, D. L. On the Design and Development of Program Families. Software Engineering, IEEE Transactions on 1976(SE-2): 1–9. · DOI · Paper page
  20. Perry, D. E. & Wolf, A. L. Foundations for the Study of Software Architecture. SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes 1992(17): 40–52. · DOI · Paper page
  21. Royce, W. E. & Royce, W. Software Architecture: Integrating Process and Technology. Quest 1991 (14): 2–15.

Cited by

See all 1,099

Metadata

Venue
Advanced Topics in Science and Technology in China
Published
2009-02-07
Pages
1-33
ISSN
1995-6819 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2140922128
Cited by
1,099
References
1
FWCI
106.39
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Introduction to Software Architecture. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-3-540-74343-9_1
The paper
Introduction to Software Architecture. (2009). Advanced Topics in Science and Technology in China. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74343-9_1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.