Cited by 223Human Motion and AnimationSpeech and dialogue systemsSocial Robot Interaction and HRI

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The behavior markup language: recent developments and challenges,

Open access
Vilhjálmsson, Hannes, Cantelmo, Nathan, Cassell, Justine, E. Chafai, Nicolas, Kipp, Michael, Kopp, Stefan, Mancini, Maurizio, Marsella, Stacy, Marshall, Andrew N., Pelachaud, Catherine, Ruttkay, Zsofi, Thórisson, Kristinn R., van Welbergen, Herwin, van der Werf, Rick J.·2007·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-540-74997-4_10

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Chafai, N.E., Pelachaud, C., Pelé, D.: A semantic description of gesture in BML. In: Proceedings of AISB 2007 Annual Convention Workshop on Language, Speech and Gesture for Expressive Characters, Newcastle, UK (2007)
  2. Warwick, W., Vilhjalmsson, H.: Engendering Believable Communicative Behaviors in Synthetic Entities for Tactical Language Training: An Interim Report. In: Proceedings of Behavior Representation in Modeling and Simulation, Universal City, CA (2005)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 223

Metadata

Authors
Vilhjálmsson, H., Cantelmo, N., Cassell, J., E. Chafai, N., Kipp, M., Kopp, S., Mancini, M., Marsella, S., Marshall, A. N., Pelachaud, C., Ruttkay, Z., Thórisson, K. R., van Welbergen, H., & van der Werf, R. J.
Affiliations
  • Reykjavík University (IS)
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • German Research Centre for Artificial Intelligence (DE)
  • Bielefeld University (DE)
  • Université Paris 8 (FR)
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • University of Twente (NL)
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2007
Pages
99-111
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W2126822690
Cited by
223
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 15
FWCI
33.75
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutial Research Information System (University of Genoa) (submittedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
  • PUB – Publications at Bielefeld University (Bielefeld University) (submittedVersion)
  • Publikationen an der Universität Bielefeld (Universität Bielefeld) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design › Human Motion and Animation
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Keywords
human-computer interaction, multimodal interfaces

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review