Sorption and Desorption of Arsenic by Soil Minerals and Soils in the Presence of Nutrients and Organics
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Toxic elements in anionic form sorb primarily to variable charge minerals, carbonate, and the edges of phyllosilicates.
“Toxic elements in anionic form sorb primarily to variable charge minerals (metal oxides and noncrystalline aluminum silicates, allophanes), carbonate, and at the edges of phyllosilicates.”
From Chemical Processes Affecting the Mobility of Heavy Metals and Metalloids in Soil Environments (2016) · cites this paper as [14]
Usually, anionic toxic elements are not sorbed on soil organic matter, but certain elements (borate, arsenate, arsenite, selenite) are found bound to humic substances.
“Usually, they are not sorbed on soil organic matter, but certain elements (e.g., borate, arsenate, arsenite, selenite) are found to be bound to humic substances [1, 2, 10, 13, 14].”
From Chemical Processes Affecting the Mobility of Heavy Metals and Metalloids in Soil Environments (2016) · cites this paper as [14]
Formation of negatively charged complexes between a metal and a ligand can increase sorption because these complexes have a higher affinity for the sorbent.
“(ii) increased sorption due to the formation of negatively charged complexes between a metal and a ligand which have a higher affinity for the sorbent”
From Chemical Processes Affecting the Mobility of Heavy Metals and Metalloids in Soil Environments (2016) · cites this paper as [14]
Dissolution of a mineral in the presence of relatively high concentration of chelating organic ligands can lead to reduced metal retention.
“(v) dissolution of the mineral in the presence of relatively high concentration of chelating organic ligands leading to reduced metal retention [6, 14].”
From Chemical Processes Affecting the Mobility of Heavy Metals and Metalloids in Soil Environments (2016) · cites this paper as [14]
A ligand sorbed on a variable charge mineral can increase retention of metal cations by decreasing the positive charge of the mineral.
“(i) increased retention of metal cations because of the decrease of the positive charge of the mineral when a ligand is sorbed”
From Chemical Processes Affecting the Mobility of Heavy Metals and Metalloids in Soil Environments (2016) · cites this paper as [14]
Foreign ligands on minerals can decrease metal retention by blocking sorption sites.
“(iii) decreased retention due to the blocking of sorption sites by foreign ligands on the minerals”
From Chemical Processes Affecting the Mobility of Heavy Metals and Metalloids in Soil Environments (2016) · cites this paper as [14]
Strong complexation of a metal in solution in non-sorbing forms can decrease retention by lowering free metal activity and leading to desorption of surface-bound metal.
“(iv) decreased retention due to the strong complexation of the metal in solution in non-sorbing forms, which can also lower free metal activity leading to desorption of surface-bound metal”
From Chemical Processes Affecting the Mobility of Heavy Metals and Metalloids in Soil Environments (2016) · cites this paper as [14]
Many factors such as pH, the surface properties of the sorbents, and the nature and charge of Me-L species in solution influence the sorption of metal cations onto soil components and soils.
“Many factors such as pH, the surface properties of the sorbents, and the nature and charge of Me-L species in solution influence the sorption of metal cations onto soil components and soils [2, 14].”
From Chemical Processes Affecting the Mobility of Heavy Metals and Metalloids in Soil Environments (2016) · cites this paper as [14]
The influence of a ligand on the sorption of metal cations depends not only on the strengths of the interactions between the metal ion, ligand, and sorbent, but also on their concentrations.
“In each of these cases, the influence of a ligand on the sorption of metal cations depends not only on the strengths of the interactions between the metal ion, ligand, and sorbent, but also on their concentrations.”
From Chemical Processes Affecting the Mobility of Heavy Metals and Metalloids in Soil Environments (2016) · cites this paper as [14]
Cites
Competitive Adsorption of Phosphate and Arsenate on Goethite
Hongshao, Z., & Stanforth, R. (2001) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es010890y · Cited by 342 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The effect of phosphate on the sorption/desorption of arsenic in soil environments has received great attention, since application of phosphate fertilizers is a management practice that can have a direct effect on the concentration of arsenic in soil solution and may enhance arsenic’s mobility (Manning and Goldberg 19…”
BackgroundEffect of pH on Adsorption of Arsenic and Selenium from Landfill Leachate by Clay Minerals
Frost, R. R., & Griffin, R. A. (1977) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj1977.03615995004100010019x · Cited by 268 · see citing works
Violante, A., Gaudio, S. D., Pigna, M., Ricciardella, M., & Banerjee, D. (2007) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es070382+ · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Chemical Processes Affecting the Mobility of Heavy Metals and Metalloids in Soil Environments
Caporale, A. G., & Violante, A. (2016) · Current Pollution Reports · doi:10.1007/s40726-015-0024-y · Cited by 369 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Violante, A., Gaudio, S. D., Pigna, M., Pucci, M., & Amalfitano, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Naples Federico II (IT)
- Venue
- Soil Mineral Microbe-Organic Interactions
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2008-05-09
- Pages
- 39-69
- OpenAlex
- W130356745
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.51
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Arsenic contamination and mitigation
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Heavy metals in environment
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Coal and Its By-products
- Keywords
- arsenic sorption, arsenic desorption, soil minerals, soil organic matter, soil nutrients, heavy metal mobility, arsenic immobilization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
