The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Study to Identify the Critical Success Factors for ERP Implementation in an Indian SME: A Case Based Approach
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“One of the CSFs identified by these studies is adequate user involvement and participation during the implementation phase (Upadhyay and Dan [28]).”
From Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) System Implementation: A Case for User Participation (2013) · cites this paper as Upadhyay and Dan [28]
Citations
Cites
Enterprise resource planning: multisite ERP implementations
Markus, M. L., Tanis, C., & van Fenema, P. C. (2000) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/332051.332068 · Cited by 377
Research works printed but not linked: 21
- Aladwani, A.: An integrated performance model of information systems projects. Journal of Management Information Systems 19(1) (2002) · DOI
- Bailey, J., Pearson, S.: Development of a tool for measuring and analyzing computer user satisfaction. Management Science 25(5), 530–545 (1983) · DOI
- Bingi, P., Sharma, M.K., Godla, J.K.: Critical issues affecting an ERP implementation. Information Systems Management 16(3), 7–14 (1999) · DOI
- Boudreau, M.C., Robey, D.: Organizational transition to enterprise resource planning systems: theoretical choices for process research. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Information Systems, Charlotte, CA, pp. 291–299 (1999)
- Cerveny, R., Scott, L.W.: A survey of MRP implementation. Production & Inventory Management Journal 30(3), 31–34 (1989)
- Chan, A., Scot, D., Lam, E.: Framework of success criteria for design build projects. Journal of Management in Engineering, 120–128 (July 2002) · DOI
- Doll, W.T., Torkzaden, G.: The measurement of end-user computing satisfaction. MIS Quarterly 12(2), 259–271 (1988) · DOI
- Davenport, T.: Putting the enterprise into the enterprising system. Harvard Business Review 76(4) (1998)
- Gibson, N., Holland, C.P., Light, B.: Enterprise resource planning: a business approach to system development. In: Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 1–9 (1999) · DOI
- Guimaraes, T., Yoon, Y., O’Neal, Q.: Success factors for manufacturing expert system development. Computers & Industrial Engineering 28(3), 545–559 (1995) · DOI
- Holsapple, C.W., Wang, Y.-M., Wu, J.-H.: Empirically testing user characteristics and fitness factors in ERP success. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 19(3), 323–342 (2005) · DOI
- Hong, K., Kim, Y.: The critical success factors for ERP implementation: An organizational fit perspective. Information and Management 40(1), 25–40 (2002) · DOI
- Luo, W., Strong, D.M.: A framework for evaluating ERP implementation choices. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 51(3), 322–333 (2004) · DOI
- Mabert, V.A., Soni, A., Venkataramanan, M.A.: Enterprise resource planning: managing the implementation process. European Journal of Operational Research 146, 302–314 (2003) · DOI
- Melone, N.P.: A theoretical assessment of the user-satisfaction construct in information systems research. Management Sciences 36(1), 76–91 (1990) · DOI
- Nunnally, J.C.: Psychometric Theory, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York (1978)
- Petroni, A.: Critical factors of MRP implementation in small and medium-sized firms. International Journal of Operations & Management 22(3), 329–348 (2002) · DOI
- Raymond, L.: Validating and applying user satisfaction as a measure of success in small organizations. Information & Management 12, 173–179 (1987) · DOI
- Ross, J.W.: Surprising facts about implementing ERP, IT Pro, (July/August 1999) · DOI
- Sengupta, K., Zviran, M.: Measuring user satisfaction in an outsourcing environment. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 44(4), 414–421 (1997) · DOI
- Somers, T., Nelson, K.: The impact of strategy and integration mechanisms on enterprising system value: Empirical evidence from manufacturing firms. European Journal of Operational Research 146(2), 315–338 (2003) · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) System Implementation: A Case for User Participation
Matende, S., & Ogao, P. (2013) · Procedia Technology · doi:10.1016/j.protcy.2013.12.058 · Cited by 104
Metadata
- Authors
- Upadhyay, P., & Dan, P. K.
- Affiliations
- Maulana Abul Kalam Azad University of Technology, West Bengal (IN)
- Venue
- Communications in Computer and Information Science
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2009
- Pages
- 185-196
- ISSN
- 1865-0929 (ISSN-L)
- 1865-0937
- OpenAlex
- W1678679383
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2015: 1 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 1.60
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Communications in computer and information science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › ERP Systems Implementation and Impact
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Governance and Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employer Branding and e-HRM
- Keywords
- enterprise resource planning, ERP implementation, success factors, small and medium-sized enterprises, legacy system replacement, business integration, Indian SMEs
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Study to Identify the Critical Success Factors for ERP Implementation in an Indian SME: A Case Based Approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-3-642-00405-6_22
- The paper
- Upadhyay, P., & Dan, P. K. (2009). A Study to Identify the Critical Success Factors for ERP Implementation in an Indian SME: A Case Based Approach. Communications in Computer and Information Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00405-6_22