The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An Accumulator Based on Bilinear Maps and Efficient Revocation for Anonymous Credentials
Open accessAbstract
The success of electronic authentication systems, be it e-ID card systems or Internet authentication systems such as CardSpace, highly depends on the provided level of user-privacy. Thereby, an important requirement is an efficient means for revocation of the authentication credentials. In this paper we consider the problem of revocation for certificate-based privacy-protecting authentication systems. To date, the most efficient solutions for revocation for such systems are based on cryptographic accumulators. Here, an accumulate of all currently valid certificates is published regularly and each user holds a witness enabling her to prove the validity of her (anonymous) credential while retaining anonymity. Unfortunately, the users' witnesses must be updated at least each time a credential is revoked. For the know solutions, these updates are computationally very expensive for users and/or certificate issuers which is very problematic as revocation is a frequent event as practice shows. In this paper, we propose a new dynamic accumulator scheme based on bilinear maps and show how to apply it to the problem of revocation of anonymous credentials. In the resulting scheme, proving a credential's validity and updating witnesses both come at (virtually) no cost for credential owners and verifiers. In particular, updating a witness requires the issuer to do only one multiplication per addition or revocation of a credential and can also be delegated to untrusted entities from which a user could just retrieve the updated witness. We believe that thereby we provide the first authentication system offering privacy protection suitable for implementation with electronic tokens such as eID cards or drivers' licenses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An Efficient System for Non-transferable Anonymous Credentials with Optional Anonymity Revocation
Camenisch, J., & Lysyanskaya, A. (2001) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-44987-6_7 · Cited by 1,321
Self-citation
Cited by
Zerocoin: Anonymous Distributed E-Cash from Bitcoin
Miers, I., Garman, C., Green, M., & Rubin, A. D. (2013) · 2013 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy · doi:10.1109/sp.2013.34 · Cited by 983
A Survey of Self-Sovereign Identity Ecosystem
Soltani, R., Nguyen, U. T., & An, A. (2021) · Security and Communication Networks · doi:10.1155/2021/8873429 · Cited by 131
Self-Sovereign Identity: Use-cases, Technologies, and Challenges for Industrial IoT
Bartolomeu, P. C., Vieira, E., Hosseini, S. M., & Ferreira, J. (2019) · 2019 24th IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA) · doi:10.1109/etfa.2019.8869262 · Cited by 79
STORK: a real, heterogeneous, large-scale eID management system
Ribeiro, C., Leitold, H., Esposito, S., & Mitzam, D. (2018) · International Journal of Information Security · doi:10.1007/s10207-017-0385-x · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Camenisch, J., Kohlweiss, M., & Soriente, C.
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2009
- Pages
- 481-500
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- 1611-3349
- OpenAlex
- W1502328873
- Cited by
- 288
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.69
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Accumulator Based on Bilinear Maps and Efficient Revocation for Anonymous Credentials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-3-642-00468-1_27
- The paper
- Camenisch, J., Kohlweiss, M., & Soriente, C. (2009). An Accumulator Based on Bilinear Maps and Efficient Revocation for Anonymous Credentials. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00468-1_27
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.