The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
STORK: a real, heterogeneous, large-scale eID management system
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“however it is also subject to security issues [87]”
From Privacy-Preserving Solutions for Blockchain: Review and Challenges (2019) · cites this paper as [87]
Citations
Cites
Non-Interactive and Information-Theoretic Secure Verifiable Secret Sharing
Pedersen, T. P. (2007) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-46766-1_9 · Cited by 2,448
Design of a role-based trust-management framework
Li, N., Mitchell, J. C., & Winsborough, W. H. (2005) · Proceedings 2002 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy · doi:10.1109/secpri.2002.1004366 · Cited by 750
The ARBAC97 model for role-based administration of roles
Sandhu, R., Bhamidipati, V., & Munawer, Q. (1999) · ACM Transactions on Information and System Security · doi:10.1145/300830.300839 · Cited by 605
Design and implementation of the idemix anonymous credential system
Camenisch, J., & Van Herreweghen, E. (2002) · Proceedings of the 9th ACM conference on Computer and communications security · doi:10.1145/586110.586114 · Cited by 555
Delegation logic: A logic-based approach to distributed authorization
Li, N., Grosof, B. N., & Feigenbaum, J. (2003) · ACM Transactions on Information and System Security · doi:10.1145/605434.605438 · Cited by 425
An Internet Attribute Certificate Profile for Authorization
Farrell, S., Housley, R., & Turner, S. (2010) · doi:10.17487/rfc5755 · Cited by 416
An Accumulator Based on Bilinear Maps and Efficient Revocation for Anonymous Credentials
Camenisch, J., Kohlweiss, M., & Soriente, C. (2009) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-00468-1_27 · Cited by 288
Randomizable Proofs and Delegatable Anonymous Credentials
Belenkiy, M., Camenisch, J., Chase, M., Kohlweiss, M., Lysyanskaya, A., & Shacham, H. (2009) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-03356-8_7 · Cited by 269
The Venn of Identity: Options and Issues in Federated Identity Management
Maler, E., & Reed, D. (2008) · IEEE Security & Privacy Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2008.50 · Cited by 207
PBDM: a flexible delegation model in RBAC
Zhang, X., Oh, S., & Sandhu, R. S. (2003) · ACM Symposium on Access Control Models and Technologies (SACMAT) · doi:10.1145/775412.775431 · Cited by 205
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Modinis, I.D.M.: Consortium and others: Modinis study on identity management in eGovernment. Common terminological framework for interoperable electronic identity management consultation Paper, vol. 2 (2005)
- Rossnagel, H., Camenisch, J., Fritsch, L., Gross, T., Houdeau, D., Huhnlein, D., Lehmann, A., Shamah, J.: FutureID—shaping the future of electronic identity. In: Proceedings of Annual Privacy Foru (2012)
- European Parliament and Council of the European Union: Regulation (EU) No 1501/2015. Off. J. Eur. Union L(235), 1–6 (2015)
Cited by
Privacy-Preserving Solutions for Blockchain: Review and Challenges
Bernal Bernabe, J., Canovas, J. L., Hernandez-Ramos, J. L., Torres Moreno, R., & Skarmeta, A. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2950872 · Cited by 459
“Some federated IdM initiatives such as Stork [47], have gone a step forward implementing a cross-border and user-centric approach, since users are put in the middle to take control of their personal data.”
BackgroundThapa, C., & Camtepe, S. (2021) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.104130 · Cited by 393
An overview of limitations and approaches in identity management
Pöhn, D., & Hommel, W. (2020) · International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security (ARES) · doi:10.1145/3407023.3407026 · Cited by 48
A Survey on Blockchain-Based Telecommunication Services Marketplaces
Tkachuk, R.-V., Ilie, D., Tutschku, K., & Robert, R. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management · doi:10.1109/tnsm.2021.3123680 · Cited by 43
Alonso, Á., Pozo, A., Choque, J., Bueno, G., Salvachúa, J., Diez, L. F., Marin, J., & Alonso, P. L. C. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2926556 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Ribeiro, C., Leitold, H., Esposito, S., & Mitzam, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Lisbon (PT)
- Corresponding author
- Ribeiro, Carlos
- ORCID
- Ribeiro, Carlos
- Venue
- International Journal of Information Security
- Published
- 2017-07-05
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 569-585
- ISSN
- 1615-5262 (ISSN-L)
- 1615-5270
- OpenAlex
- W2734116279
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 2.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Information Security (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Directorate-General for Research and Innovation (224993, 297263)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Advanced Authentication Protocols Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › User Authentication and Security Systems
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
- Keywords
- electronic identification, federated identity management, interoperability framework, eIDAS Regulation, e-health, privacy law, EU member states
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: STORK: a real, heterogeneous, large-scale eID management system. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10207-017-0385-x
- The paper
- Ribeiro, C., Leitold, H., Esposito, S., & Mitzam, D. (2018). STORK: a real, heterogeneous, large-scale eID management system. International Journal of Information Security. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10207-017-0385-x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
