Cited by 107Advanced Vision and ImagingVideo Surveillance and Tracking MethodsImage and Video Stabilization

Complementary Optic Flow

Zimmer, Henning, Bruhn, Andrés, Weickert, Joachim, Valgaerts, Levi, Salgado, Agustín, Rosenhahn, Bodo, Seidel, Hans-Peter·2009·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-642-03641-5_16

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Complementary OF (Zimmer et al. 2009) on the Urban sequence has an average AE of 4.64 degrees, ranking 6th in the table at the time of writing.

    “The average AE is 4.64 degrees which ranks 6th in the table at the time of writing.”

    From A Database and Evaluation Methodology for Optical Flow (2011) · cites this paper as Zimmer et al. 2009

  • Complementary OF (Zimmer et al. 2009) on the Urban sequence has an average EE of 1.78 pixels, ranking 20th in the table at the time of writing.

    “The average EE is 1.78 pixels which ranks 20th at the time of writing.”

    From A Database and Evaluation Methodology for Optical Flow (2011) · cites this paper as Zimmer et al. 2009

  • The Complementary OF algorithm (Zimmer et al. 2009) fails to correctly estimate the flow of the building in the bottom left on the Urban sequence.

    “The Complementary OF algorithm (which otherwise does very well) fails to correctly estimate the flow of the building in the bottom left.”

    From A Database and Evaluation Methodology for Optical Flow (2011) · cites this paper as Zimmer et al. 2009

  • Complementary OF's good performance on hidden texture data is presumably due to its relatively sophisticated data term, including a different robust penalization function for each channel in HSV color space.

    “presumably due to the use of a relatively sophisticated data term, including the use of a different robust penalization function for each channel in HSV color space”

    From A Database and Evaluation Methodology for Optical Flow (2011) · cites this paper as Zimmer et al. 2009

  • Complementary OF (Zimmer et al. 2009) does well on the hidden texture data (Army, Mequon, Schefflera, Wooden).

    “Complementary OF (Zimmer et al. 2009) does well on the hidden texture data ( Army , Mequon , Schefflera , Wooden )”

    From A Database and Evaluation Methodology for Optical Flow (2011) · cites this paper as Zimmer et al. 2009

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zimmer, H., Bruhn, A., Weickert, J., Valgaerts, L., Salgado, A., Rosenhahn, B., & Seidel, H.-P.
Affiliations
  • Max Planck Institute for Informatics (DE)
  • Saarland University (DE)
  • Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria (ES)
  • Leibniz University Hannover (DE)
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2009
Pages
207-220
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W2143485281
Cited by
107
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 9
FWCI
9.26
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Vision and Imaging
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Video Stabilization
Keywords
optical flow, variational methods, complementarity, data term, smoothness term, anisotropic smoothing, Middlebury benchmark

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review