The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Privacy Preservation Model for Facebook-Style Social Network Systems
Open accessAbstract
Recent years have seen unprecedented growth in the popularity of social network systems, with Facebook being an archetypical example. The access control paradigm behind the privacy preservation mechanism of Facebook is distinctly different from such existing access control paradigms as Discretionary Access Control, Role-Based Access Control, Capability Systems, and Trust Management Systems. This work takes a first step in deepening the understanding of this access control paradigm, by proposing an access control model that formalizes and generalizes the privacy preservation mechanism of Facebook. The model can be instantiated into a family of Facebook-style social network systems, each with a recognizably different access control mechanism, so that Facebook is but one instantiation of the model. We also demonstrate that the model can be instantiated to express policies that are not currently supported by Facebook but possess rich and natural social significance. This work thus delineates the design space of privacy preservation mechanisms for Facebook-style social network systems, and lays out a formal framework for policy analysis in these systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship
boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x · Cited by 16,251
Communities of Practice and Social Learning Systems
Wenger, E. (2000) · Organization · doi:10.1177/135050840072002 · Cited by 4,274 · cited 1×
“…(e.g. self-study or guided learning), authoring and delivery of learning objects, tutoring, communication, performance evaluation, annotation, administration, etc. Embedded with tools for blogging, podcasting, or social book-marking, today’s e-learning environments support social learning [23].”
BackgroundInformation revelation and privacy in online social networks
Gross, R., & Acquisti, A. (2005) · Proceedings of the 2005 ACM workshop on Privacy in the electronic society · doi:10.1145/1102199.1102214 · Cited by 2,028
Imagined Communities: Awareness, Information Sharing, and Privacy on the Facebook
Acquisti, A., & Gross, R. (2006) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/11957454_3 · Cited by 1,895
Programming semantics for multiprogrammed computations
Dennis, J. B., & Van Horn, E. C. (1966) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/365230.365252 · Cited by 575
Metadata
- Authors
- Fong, P. W. L., Anwar, M., & Zhao, Z.
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2009
- Pages
- 303-320
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- 1611-3349
- OpenAlex
- W1555093693
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 43.91
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
