Cited by 16,251Media and Digital CommunicationSocial Media and PoliticsImpact of Technology on Adolescents

Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship

Open access
boyd, danah m., Ellison, Nicole B.·2007·Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication

Abstract

Social network sites (SNSs) are increasingly attracting the attention of academic and industry researchers intrigued by their affordances and reach. This special theme section of the Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication brings together scholarship on these emergent phenomena. In this introductory article, we describe features of SNSs and propose a comprehensive definition. We then present one perspective on the history of such sites, discussing key changes and developments. After briefly summarizing existing scholarship concerning SNSs, we discuss the articles in this special section and conclude with considerations for future research.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These norms are shaped by factors including the specific value proposition of each platform, and the composition of their user base.

    “These norms are shaped by factors including the specific value proposition of each platform, and the composition of their user base”

    From Social Data: Biases, Methodological Pitfalls, and Ethical Boundaries (2019) · cites this paper as boyd and Ellison, 2007

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. boyd, d. (in press-b). None of this is real. In J. Karaganis (Ed.), Structures of Participation. New York: Social Science Research Council.
  2. Byrne, D. (in press). The future of (the) 'race': Identity, discourse and the rise of computer-mediated public spheres. In A. Everett (Ed.), MacArthur Foundation Book Series on Digital Learning: Race and Ethnicity Volume (pp. 15-38). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  3. Cassidy, J. (2006, May 15). Me media: How hanging out on the Internet became big business. The New Yorker, 82(13), 50.
  4. Fono, D., & Raynes-Goldie, K. (2006). Hyperfriendship and beyond: Friends and social norms on LiveJournal. In M. Consalvo & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), Internet Research Annual Volume 4: Selected Papers from the AOIR Conference (pp. 91-103). New York: Peter Lang.
  5. Fragoso, S. (2006). WTF a crazy Brazilian invasion. In F. Sudweeks & H. Hrachovec (Eds.), Proceedings of CATaC 2006 (pp. 255-274). Murdoch, Australia: Murdoch University.
  6. Hewitt, A., & Forte, A. (2006, November). Crossing boundaries: Identity management and student/faculty relationships on the Facebook. Poster presented at CSCW, Banff, Alberta.
  7. Hjorth, L., & Yuji, M. (in press). Logging on locality: A cross-cultural case study of virtual communities Mixi (Japan) and Mini-hompy (Korea). In B. Smaill (Ed.), Youth and Media in the Asia Pacific. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  8. Hodge, M. J. (2006). The Fourth Amendment and privacy issues on the ''new'' Internet: Facebook.com and MySpace.com. Southern Illinois University Law Journal, 31, 95-122.
  9. Nyland, R., & Near, C. (2007, February). Jesus is my friend: Religiosity as a mediating factor in Internet social networking use. Paper presented at AEJMC Midwinter Conference, Reno, NV.
  10. Perkel, D. (in press). Copy and paste literacy? Literacy practices in the production of a MySpace profile. In K. Drotner, H. S. Jensen, & K. Schroeder (Eds.), Informal Learning and Digital Media: Constructions, Contexts, Consequences. Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • Michigan State University (US)
Venue
Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication
Published
2007-10
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
210-230
ISSN
1083-6101 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1985749074
Cited by
16,251
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 295 · 2025: 481 · 2024: 555 · 2023: 699 · 2022: 811 · 2021: 942 · 2020: 1052 · 2019: 989 · 2018: 1117 · 2017: 1069 · 2016: 1146 · 2015: 1293 · 2014: 1379 · 2013: 1334 · 2012: 1122
FWCI
508.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Michigan State University
  • Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Keywords
social network sites, affordances, social media, future research directions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review