CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1

Methods for Effective Sonification of Clarinetists’ Ancillary Gestures

Grond, Florian, Hermann, Thomas, Verfaille, Vincent, Wanderley, Marcelo M.·2010·Lecture Notes in Computer Science
DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-12553-9_15
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-642-12553-9_15

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Auditory feedback may reallocate perceptual and cognitive workload and reduce distraction because auditory perception requires neither specific athlete orientation nor a focus of attention.

    “Auditory feedback may not only reallocate perceptual and cognitive workload, but also reduce distraction, since, unlike visual perception, auditory perception requires neither specific athlete orientation nor a focus of attention (Eldridge, 2006;Grond, Hermann, Verfaille, & Wanderley, 2010;Secoli, Milot, Rosati, & Reinkensmeyer, 2011).”

    From Augmented visual, auditory, haptic, and multimodal feedback in motor learning: A review (2013) · cites this paper as Grond et al., 2010

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grond, F., Hermann, T., Verfaille, V., & Wanderley, M. M.
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published
2010
Pages
171-181
ISSN
  • 0302-9743
  • 1611-3349
DOI
10.1007/978-3-642-12553-9_15
Cited by
1
References
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review