Addressing the Privacy Paradox by Expanded Privacy Awareness – The Example of Context-Aware Services
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Research focusing on smartphone behavior and the use of mobile applications in particular remains scarce.
“while research focusing on smartphone behavior and the use of mobile applications in particular remains scarce (Deuker, 2010;Oetzel and Gonja, 2011;Zafeiropoulou et al., 2013).”
From Putting the privacy paradox to the test: Online privacy and security behaviors among users with technical knowledge, privacy awareness, and financial resources (2019) · cites this paper as Deuker, 2010
Section 4.2 says research on implementing situation-specific privacy awareness is still in its infancy and mentions a study of mobile recommendation systems. That supports scarcity in a narrower area, but not the broader claim that research on smartphone behavior and mobile-application use is scarce. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredA user's ability to access all the relevant information is bounded by nature, leading to a situation where the risks are deemed to be outweighed by benefits.
“A user's ability to access all the relevant information is bounded by nature, leading to a situation where the risks are deemed to be outweighed by benefits (Deuker, 2010).”
From The privacy paradox – investigating discrepancies between expressed privacy concerns and actual online behavior – a systematic literature review (2017) · cites this paper as Deuker, 2010
Section 3 says users have limited ability to access and process decision-relevant information, and that their processing and reasoning capabilities are restricted by nature. But it says bounded rationality can lead to either over- or underestimation of privacy risks; it does not establish that limited access itself causes users to judge benefits as outweighing risks. The separate discussion of immediate gratification says benefits can lead users to underestimate privacy risks. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIndividuals tend to heavily discount the low probability of high future risks, resulting in a preference for almost instantaneous benefits.
“Thus, individuals tend to heavily discount the low probability of high future risks (e.g.identity theft), resulting in a preference for almost instantaneous benefits (Acquisti, 2004;Acquisti and Grossklags, 2005;Deuker, 2010;Flender and Müller, 2012;Hughes-Roberts, 2013).”
From The privacy paradox – investigating discrepancies between expressed privacy concerns and actual online behavior – a systematic literature review (2017) · cites this paper as Deuker, 2010
The section on immediate gratification says that immediate benefits can lead users to underestimate future privacy risks, and Section 3 says users give less weight to privacy threats that arise later. The copy does not characterize those risks as low-probability but high-impact, establish that they are heavily discounted, or give identity theft as an example. No page numbers were provided. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredEnhancing privacy awareness alone is not the solution for this complex problem.
“Deuker (2010) concluded that enhancing privacy awareness alone is not the solution for this complex problem.”
From Putting the privacy paradox to the test: Online privacy and security behaviors among users with technical knowledge, privacy awareness, and financial resources (2019) · cites this paper as Deuker (2010)
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Design Science in Information Systems Research1
Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148625 · Cited by 10,707 · cited 2× · see citing works
“In a next step the insights of this paper will be embedded into the design science framework provided by H EVNER [7] to allow for a proper enhancement of propositions, e.g. to consider the heterogeneity of user in the process of awareness creation, and to derive provable hypotheses.”
BackgroundMethodPrivacy Awareness: A Means to Solve the Privacy Paradox?
Pötzsch, S. (2009) · IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-03315-5_17 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- Acquisti, A.: Privacy in electronic commerce and the economics of immediate gratifica- tion. In: Proceedings of the 2004 ACM Electronic Commerce Conference (2004)
- Acquisti, A., Grossklags, J.: Privacy and rationality in individual decision making. IEEE Security and Privacy 3(1), 26-33 (2005)
- Awad, N.F., Krishnan, M.S.: The personalization privacy paradox: An empirical evalua- tion of information transparency and willingness to be profiled online for personalaliza- tion. MIS Quaterly 30(1), 13-28 (2006)
- Benbasat, I., Zmud, R.W.: The Identity Crisis within the IS Discipline: Defining and Communicating the Discipline's Core Properties. MIS Quarterly 27(2), 183-194 (2003)
- Brehm, J.: A Theory of Psychological Reactance. In: Festinger, L., Schachter, S. (eds.) Social Psychology. A series of monographs, treatises, and texts, Academic Press, London (1966)
- Dey, A.K., Abowd, G.D.: Towards a Better Understanding of Context and Context- Awareness. In: CHI 2000 Workshop on the What, Who, Where, When, and How of Con- text-Awareness (2000)
- Hoy, M.: Flaming, Complaining, Abstaining: How Online Users Respond to Privacy Concern. Journal of Advertising 28(3), 41-45 (1999)
- Norberg, P.A., Horne, D.R., Horne, D.A.: The Privacy Paradox: Personal Information Dis- closure Intentions versus Behaviors. Journal of Consumer Affairs 41(1), 100-126 (2007)
- Radmacher, M.: Design Criteria for Transparent Mobile Event Recommendations. In: Proceedings of the 11th Americas Conference on Information Systems, Toronto (2008)
- Simon, H.A.: Models of bounded rationality. MIT Press, Cambridge (1982)
- Spiekermann, S., Grossklags, J., Berendt, B.: E-privacy in 2nd generation E-commerce: privacy preferences versus actual behavior. In: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, New York, pp. 28-47 (2001)
- Zerdick, A., Picot, A., Schrape, A.: Die Internet-Ökonomie: Strategien für die digitale Wirtschaft. In: European Communication Council Report. Springer, Berlin (2006)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Barth, S., & de Jong, M. D. T. (2017) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2017.04.013 · Cited by 798 · see citing works
Gerber, N., Gerber, P., & Volkamer, M. (2018) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2018.04.002 · Cited by 511 · see citing works
Barth, S., de Jong, M. D. T., Junger, M., Hartel, P. H., & Roppelt, J. C. (2019) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2019.03.003 · Cited by 219 · see citing works
- Authors
- Deuker, A.
- Affiliations
- Goethe University Frankfurt (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Deuker, André
- Venue
- IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2010
- Volume
- AICT-320
- Pages
- 275-283
- ISSN
- 1571-5736 (ISSN-L)
- 1868-4238
- 1861-2288
- OpenAlex
- W32117899
- Cited by
- 48
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 2.80
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- IFIP International Federation for Information Processing/IFIP (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Fundación Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago de Compostela
- European Commission
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Keywords
- privacy paradox, privacy awareness, context-aware services, personal information disclosure, user privacy behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
