CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 46

Wound Ballistics

Coupland, Robin M., Rothschild, Markus A., Thali, Michael J.·2011
DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-20356-5
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-642-20356-5

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Long bones hit by a bullet are primarily fractured due to hydraulic pressure built up in the bone marrow, generated by the temporary cavity, which acts in all directions across the whole cortical bone, causing the diaphysis to split open from within and shatter.

    “Long bones hit by a bullet are primarily fractured due to the hydraulic pressure built up in the bone marrow (generated by the temporary cavity), which acts in all directions across the whole cortical bone, causing the diaphysis to split open from within and shatter [5,31].”

    From Osteonal Damage Patterns from Ballistic and Blunt Force Trauma in Human Long Bones (2024) · cites this paper as [31]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Coupland, R. M., Rothschild, M. A., & Thali, M. J.
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published
2011
DOI
10.1007/978-3-642-20356-5
Cited by
46
References
0
Language
en
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review