Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 52

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Fundamental Principle of Coactive Design: Interdependence Must Shape Autonomy

Johnson, Matthew, Bradshaw, Jeffrey M., Feltovich, Paul J., Jonker, Catholijn M., van Riemsdijk, Birna, Sierhuis, Maarten·2011·Lecture Notes in Computer Science
DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-21268-0_10
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-642-21268-0_10

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. Bradshaw, J.M., Feltovich, P., Johnson, M.: Human-Agent Interaction. In: Boy, G. (ed.) Handbook of Human-Machine Interaction. Ashgate (2011) (in press)
  2. Kortenkamp, D.: Designing an Architecture for Adjustably Autonomous Robot Teams. Revised Papers from the PRICAI, Workshop Reader, Four Workshops held at PRICAI 2000, on Advances in Artificial Intelligence. Springer, Heidelberg (2000) · doi:10.1007/3-540-45408-x_34
  3. Fong, T.W.: Collaborative Control: A Robot-Centric Model for Vehicle Teleoperation. Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA (2001)
  4. Brookshire, J., Singh, S., Simmons, R.: Preliminary Results in Sliding Autonomy for Coordinated Teams. In: Proceedings of The 2004 Spring Symposium Series (2004) · doi:10.1109/iros.2004.1389435
  5. Bradshaw, J.M., Acquisti, A., Allen, J., Breedy, M.R., Bunch, L., Chambers, N., Feltovich, P., Galescu, L., Goodrich, M.A., Jeffers, R., Johnson, M., Jung, H., Lott, J., Olsen Jr., D.R., Sierhuis, M., Suri, N., Taysom, W., Tonti, G., Uszok, A.: Teamwork-centered autonomy for extended human-agent interaction in space applications. Presented at the AAAI 2004 Spring Symposium, March 22-24. Stanford University, CA (2004)
  6. Bradshaw, J.M., Feltovich, P., Jung, H., Kulkarni, S., Taysom, W., Uszok, A.: Dimensions of adjustable autonomy and mixed-initiative interaction. In: Nickles, M., Rovatsos, M., Weiss, G. (eds.) AUTONOMY 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2969, pp. 17–39. Springer, Heidelberg (2004) · DOI
  7. Castelfranchi, C.: Founding Agents “Autonomy” on Dependence Theory. In: ECAI 2000, pp. 353–357 (2000)
  8. Sheridan, T.B.: Telerobotics, automation, and human supervisory control, p. 393, xx. MIT Press, Cambridge (1992)
  9. Dorais, G., Kortenkamp, D.: Designing Human-Centered Autonomous Agents. Revised Papers from the PRICAI 2000, Workshop Reader, Four Workshops held at PRICAI 2000, on Advances in Artificial Intelligence. Springer, Heidelberg (2000) · DOI
  10. Dias, M.B., Kannan, B., Browning, B., Jones, E., Argall, B., Dias, M.F., Zinck, M.B., Veloso, M.M., Stentz, A.T.: Sliding Autonomy for Peer-To-Peer Human-Robot Teams. Robotics Institute, Pittsburgh (2008); Myers, K.L., Morley, D.N.: Directing Agent Communities: An Initial Framework. In: Proceedings of the IJCAI Workshop on Autonomy, Delegation, and Control: Interacting with Autonomous Agents, Seattle, WA (2001)
  11. Myers, K.L., Morley, D.N.: Human directability of agents. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Knowledge Capture. ACM, Victoria (2001)
  12. Yanco, H.A., Drury, J.L.: A Taxonomy for Human-Robot Interaction. In: AAAI Fall Symposium on Human-Robot Interaction (2002)
  13. Goodrich, M.A., Schultz, A.C.: Human-robot interaction: a survey. Found. Trends Hum.-Comput. Interact. 1(3), 203–275 (2007) · DOI · Paper page
  14. Stubbs, K., Hinds, P., Wettergreen, D.: Autonomy and common ground in human-robot interaction: A field study. IEEE Intelligent Systems (Special Issue on Interacting with Autonomy), 42–50 (2007) · DOI
  15. Norman, D.A.: The “problem” of automation: Inappropriate feedback and interaction, not “over-automation”. In: Broadbent, D.E., Baddeley, A., Reason, J.T. (eds.) Human Factors in Hazardous Situations, pp. 585–593. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1990)
  16. Woods, D.D., Sarter, N.B.: Automation Surprises. In: Salvendy, G. (ed.) Handbook of Human Factors & Ergonomics. Wiley, Chichester (1997)
  17. Clark, H.H.: Using language, p. 432, xi. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1996) · DOI · Paper page
  18. Klein, G., Feltovich, P.J., Bradshaw, J.M., Woods, D.D.: Common Ground and Coordination in Joint Activity. In: William, K.R.B., Rouse, B. (eds.) Organizational Simulation, pp. 139–184 (2005) · DOI · Paper page
  19. Thompson, J.D.: Organizations in action; social science bases of administrative theory, p. 192, xi. McGraw-Hill, New York (1967)
  20. Feltovich, P.J., Bradshaw, J.M., Clancey, W.J., Johnson, M.: Toward an Ontology of Regulation: Socially-Based Support for Coordination in Human and Machine Joint Activity. In: O’Hare, G.M.P., Ricci, A., O’Grady, M.J., Dikenelli, O. (eds.) ESAW 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4457, pp. 175–192. Springer, Heidelberg (2007) · DOI
  21. Feltovich, P.J., Bradshaw, J.M., Clancey, W.J., Johnson, M., Bunch, L.: Progress Appraisal as a Challenging Element of Coordination in Human and Machine Joint Activity. In: Artikis, A., O’Hare, G.M.P., Stathis, K., Vouros, G.A. (eds.) ESAW 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4995, pp. 124–141. Springer, Heidelberg (2008) · DOI
  22. Covey, S.R.: The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People. Free Press, New York (1989)
  23. Sierhuis, M.: “It’s not just goals all the way down” – “It’s activities all the way down”. In: O’Hare, G.M.P., Ricci, A., O’Grady, M.J., Dikenelli, O. (eds.) ESAW 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4457, pp. 1–24. Springer, Heidelberg (2007) · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-75524-1_1
  24. van Diggelen, J., Bradshaw, J.M., Johnson, M., Uszok, A., Feltovich, P.: Implementing collective oblications in human-agent teams using KAoS policies. In: Proceedings of Workshop on Coordination, Organization, Institutions and Norms (COIN), IEEE/ACM Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, Budapest, Hungary, May 12 (2009) · DOI
  25. Johnson, M., Jonker, C., van Riemsdijk, B., Feltovich, P.J., Bradshaw, J.M.: Joint Activity Testbed: Blocks World for Teams (BW4T). In: Aldewereld, H., Dignum, V., Picard, G. (eds.) ESAW 2009. LNCS, vol. 5881, pp. 254–256. Springer, Heidelberg (2009) · DOI
  26. Bleicher, A.: The Gulf Spill’s Lessons for Robotics. In: IEEE spectrum special report (2010) · doi:10.1109/mspec.2010.5520612
  27. Christoffersen, K., Woods, D.D.: How to Make Automated Systems Team Players (2002) · DOI · Paper page
  28. Norman, D.A.: The invisible computer: why good products can fail, the personal computer is so complex, and information appliances are the solution, p. 302, xii. MIT Press, Cambridge (1998)

Cited by

See all 52

Metadata

Authors
Johnson, M., Bradshaw, J. M., Feltovich, P. J., Jonker, C. M., van Riemsdijk, B., & Sierhuis, M.
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published
2011
Pages
172-191
ISSN
  • 0302-9743
  • 1611-3349
DOI
10.1007/978-3-642-21268-0_10
Cited by
52
References
5
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (unspecified)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Fundamental Principle of Coactive Design: Interdependence Must Shape Autonomy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-3-642-21268-0_10
The paper
Johnson, M., Bradshaw, J. M., Feltovich, P. J., Jonker, C. M., van Riemsdijk, B., & Sierhuis, M. (2011). The Fundamental Principle of Coactive Design: Interdependence Must Shape Autonomy. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21268-0_10

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.