The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Large Scale Personality Classification of Bloggers
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Not limited to categorical language they found open-vocabulary features, such as bigrams, to be better predictors than LIWC features.”
From Personality, Gender, and Age in the Language of Social Media: The Open-Vocabulary Approach (2013) · cites this paper as [67]
In the citing paper
“When we do such an approach, our scores are in similar ranges to such literature: to classification accuracy.”
From Personality, Gender, and Age in the Language of Social Media: The Open-Vocabulary Approach (2013) · cites this paper as [67]
Citations
Cites
Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques
Witten, I. H., Frank, E., & Hall, M. A. (2011) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2009-0-19715-5 · Cited by 25,543
Witten, I. H. (2008) · Cited by 9,143
An algorithm for suffix stripping
Porter, M. F. (1980) · Program · doi:10.1108/eb046814 · Cited by 8,096
LIBLINEAR: A Library for Large Linear Classification
Fan, R.-E., Chang, K., Hsieh, C., Xiang-rui, W., & Lin, C. (2008) · doi:10.5555/1390681.1442794 · Cited by 6,684
Fast Training of Support Vector Machines Using Sequential Minimal Optimization
Platt, J. C. (1998) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/1130.003.0016 · Cited by 5,501
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.34-3702 · Cited by 4,872
Linguistic styles: language use as an individual difference
Pennebaker, J. W., & King, L. A. (1999) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1296 · Cited by 1,961
Using linguistic cues for the automatic recognition of personality in conversation and text
Mairesse, F., Walker, M. A., Mehl, M. R., & Moore, R. K. (2007) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.2349 · Cited by 1,046
Witten, I. H., & Frank, E. (2005) · Cited by 815
Mehl, M. R., Gosling, S. D., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2006) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.862 · Cited by 764
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Argamon, S., Dhawle, S., Koppel, M., Pennebaker, J.W.: Lexical predictors of personality type. In: Proceedings of the 2005 Joint Annual Meeting of the Interface and the Classification Society of North America (2005)
- Estival, D., Gaustad, T., Pham, S.B., Radford, W., Hutchinson, B.: Author profiling for english emails. In: 10th Conference of the Pacific Association for Computational Linguistics (PACLING 2007), pp. 262–272 (2007)
- Pennebaker, J.W., Francis, M.E.: Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count, 1st edn. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah (1999)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Personality, Gender, and Age in the Language of Social Media: The Open-Vocabulary Approach
Schwartz, H. A., Eichstaedt, J. C., Kern, M. L., Dziurzynski, L., Ramones, S. M., Agrawal, M., Shah, A., Kosinski, M., Stillwell, D., Seligman, M. E. P., et al. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0073791 · Cited by 1,700
Automatic personality assessment through social media language.
Park, G., Schwartz, H. A., Eichstaedt, J. C., Kern, M. L., Kosinski, M., Stillwell, D. J., Ungar, L. H., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2015) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspp0000020 · Cited by 802
Using Machine Learning to Advance Personality Assessment and Theory
Bleidorn, W., & Hopwood, C. J. (2018) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868318772990 · Cited by 276
The Acquisitive Nature of Extraverted CEOs
Malhotra, S., Reus, T. H., Zhu, P., & Roelofsen, E. (2017) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0001839217712240 · Cited by 195
Reddit: A Gold Mine for Personality Prediction
Gjurković, M., & Šnajder, J. (2018) · doi:10.18653/v1/w18-1112 · Cited by 132
Metadata
- Authors
- Iacobelli, F., Gill, A. J., Nowson, S., & Oberlander, J.
- Affiliations
- Northeastern Illinois University (US)
- University of Surrey (GB)
- University of Edinburgh (GB)
- ORCID
- Iacobelli, Francisco
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2011
- Pages
- 568-577
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- 1611-3349
- OpenAlex
- W1562816477
- Cited by
- 136
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 15.04
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
- Open Research (University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
- Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
- Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Authorship Attribution and Profiling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
- Keywords
- personality classification, bloggers, Big Five personality traits, feature selection, LIWC, language and personality, online text analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
