Cited by 1,046Authorship Attribution and ProfilingMental Health via WritingEmotion and Mood Recognition

Using linguistic cues for the automatic recognition of personality in conversation and text

Open access
Mairesse, F., Walker, M. A., Mehl, M. R., Moore, R. K.·2007·Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research

Abstract

It is well known that utterances convey a great deal of information about the speaker in addition to their semantic content. One such type of information consists of cues to the speaker's personality traits, the most fundamental dimension of variation between humans. Recent work explores the automatic detection of other types of pragmatic variation in text and conversation, such as emotion, deception, speaker charisma, dominance, point of view, subjectivity, opinion and sentiment. Personality affects these other aspects of linguistic production, and thus personality recognition may be useful for these tasks, in addition to many other potential applications. However, to date, there is little work on the automatic recognition of personality traits. This article reports experimental results for recognition of all Big Five personality traits, in both conversation and text, utilising both self and observer ratings of personality. While other work reports classification results, we experiment with classification, regression and ranking models. For each model, we analyse the effect of different feature sets on accuracy. Results show that for some traits, any type of statistical model performs significantly better than the baseline, but ranking models perform best overall. We also present an experiment suggesting that ranking models are more accurate than multi-class classifiers for modelling personality. In addition, recognition models trained on observed personality perform better than models trained using self-reports, and the optimal feature set depends on the personality trait. A qualitative analysis of the learned models confirms previous findings linking language and personality, while revealing many new linguistic markers.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1613/jair.2349

Cites

102 of 102 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Mishne, G. (2005). Experiments with mood classification in blog posts. In Proceedings of ACM SIGIR 2005 Workshop on Stylistic Analysis of Text for Information Access.
  2. Oudeyer, P.-Y. (2002). Novel useful features and algorithms for the recognition of emotions in speech. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Speech Prosody, pp. 547-550.
  3. Reeves, B., & Nass, C. (1996). The Media Equation. University of Chicago Press.
  4. Scherer, K. R. (1979). Personality markers in speech. In Scherer, K. R., & Giles, H. (Eds.), Social markers in speech, pp. 147-209. Cambridge University Press.
  5. Vogel, K., & Vogel, S. (1986). L'interlangue et la personalité de l'apprenant. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 24 (1), 48-68.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mairesse, F., Walker, M. A., Mehl, M. R., & Moore, R. K.
Affiliations
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
  • University of Arizona (US)
Venue
Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research
Published
2007-11-28
Volume
30
Pages
457-500
ISSN
1076-9757 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2423024114
Cited by
1,046
References
102
Citations by year
2026: 83 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 66 · 2023: 59 · 2022: 78 · 2021: 96 · 2020: 79 · 2019: 74 · 2018: 66 · 2017: 63 · 2016: 58 · 2015: 48 · 2014: 55 · 2013: 57 · 2012: 44
FWCI
13.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Authorship Attribution and Profiling
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
Keywords
personality recognition, Big Five personality traits, linguistic cues, conversation analysis, text analysis, self-report, observer ratings, ranking models, regression models, multi-class classification, feature sets, language and personality, pragmatic variation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review