Cited by 27Ethics and Social Impacts of AIPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in DataDiscrimination and Equality Law

Direct and Indirect Discrimination Prevention Methods

Hajian, Sara, Domingo-Ferrer, Josep·2013·Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-642-30487-3_13

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hajian, S., & Domingo-Ferrer, J.
Affiliations
Universitat Rovira i Virgili (ES)
Corresponding author
Hajian, Sara
Venue
Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics
Published
2013
Pages
241-254
ISSN
  • 2192-6255 (ISSN-L)
  • 2192-6263
OpenAlex
W2226176641
Cited by
27
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2014: 2
FWCI
3.44
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Studies in applied philosophy, epistemology and rational ethics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Social Sciences › Law › Discrimination and Equality Law
Keywords
discrimination prevention, direct discrimination, indirect discrimination, anti-discrimination, biased training data, evaluation metrics, fairness in decision-making

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review