Cited by 102Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsVisual and Cognitive Learning Processes

“Guru: a computer tutor that models expert human tutors,”

Olney, Andrew M., D’Mello, Sidney, Person, Natalie, Cade, Whitney, Hays, Patrick, Williams, Claire, Lehman, Blair, Graesser, Arthur·2012·Lecture notes in computer science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-642-30950-2_32

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Early designs of interactive tutoring aids comprised rule-based systems mirroring interactions between expert teacher and student or between peer companions.

    “Early designs of interactive tutoring aids for teaching and support comprised of rule-based systems mirroring interactions between expert teacher and student (Arroyo et al., 2004; Olney et al., 2012) or between peer companions (Movellan et al., 2009).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Olney, A. M., D’Mello, S., Person, N., Cade, W., Hays, P., Williams, C., Lehman, B., & Graesser, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Memphis (US)
  • University of Notre Dame (US)
  • Rhodes College (US)
Venue
Lecture notes in computer science
Published
2012
Pages
256-261
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W80135617
Cited by
102
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 2
FWCI
5.64
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
Keywords
intelligent tutoring systems, high school biology, scaffolding, concept mapping, cloze task, learning gains

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review