The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Traffic Flow Dynamics: Data, Models and Simulation
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Influence of connected and autonomous vehicles on traffic flow stability and throughput
Talebpour, A., & Mahmassani, H. S. (2016) · Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.trc.2016.07.007 · Cited by 1,388
Human-like autonomous car-following model with deep reinforcement learning
Zhu, M., Wang, X., & Wang, Y. (2018) · Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.trc.2018.10.024 · Cited by 533
Capturing Car-Following Behaviors by Deep Learning
Wang, X., Jiang, R., Li, L., Lin, Y., Zheng, X., & Wang, F.-Y. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2017.2706963 · Cited by 325
Zhou, M., Qu, X., & Jin, S. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2016.2606492 · Cited by 291
Automated Driving, Traffic Flow Efficiency, and Human Factors: Literature Review
Hoogendoorn, R., van Arerm, B., & Hoogendoom, S. (2014) · Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board · doi:10.3141/2422-13 · Cited by 148
Metadata
- Authors
- Treiber, M., & Kesting, A.
- Venue
- Springer eBooks
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2013
- OpenAlex
- W2487175822
- Cited by
- 1,351
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 39.38
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Traffic Flow Dynamics: Data, Models and Simulation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-3-642-32460-4
- The paper
- Treiber, M., & Kesting, A. (2013). Traffic Flow Dynamics: Data, Models and Simulation. Springer eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32460-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
