Cited by 4,402Probability and Risk ModelsFinancial Risk and Volatility ModelingStochastic processes and financial applications

Modelling Extremal Events

Embrechts, Paul, Klüppelberg, Claudia, Mikosch, Thomas·1997·Springer eBooks

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-642-33483-2

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Embrechts, P., Klüppelberg, C., & Mikosch, T.
Affiliations
  • Technical University of Munich (DE)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
Venue
Springer eBooks
Published
1997
OpenAlex
W2502254989
Cited by
4,402
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 140 · 2025: 137 · 2024: 128 · 2023: 142 · 2022: 136 · 2021: 115 · 2020: 164 · 2019: 142 · 2018: 192 · 2017: 175 · 2016: 198 · 2015: 182 · 2014: 250 · 2013: 200 · 2012: 252
FWCI
46.74
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Probability and Risk Models
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Stochastic processes and financial applications
Keywords
extreme value theory, financial fluctuations, stock market shocks, risk management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review