Cognitive and Linguistic Aspects of Geographic Space: New Perspectives on Geographic Information Research

Open access

·2013·Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography

DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-34359-9

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-642-34359-9

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Spatial knowledge acquisition from direct experience in the environment: Individual differences in the development of metric knowledge and the integration of separately learned places☆
ISHIKAWA, T., & MONTELLO, D. (2006) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2005.08.003 · Cited by 640
Opening up Smart Cities: Citizen-Centric Challenges and Opportunities from GIScience
Degbelo, A., Granell, C., Trilles, S., Bhattacharya, D., Casteleyn, S., & Kray, C. (2016) · ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information · doi:10.3390/ijgi5020016 · Cited by 166
A computational approach to ‘The Image of the City’
Filomena, G., Verstegen, J. A., & Manley, E. (2019) · Cities · doi:10.1016/j.cities.2019.01.006 · Cited by 151
GIS AND URBAN STUDIES: POSITIVISM, POST-POSITIVISM, AND BEYOND
Sui, D. Z. (1994) · Urban Geography · doi:10.2747/0272-3638.15.3.258 · Cited by 44

Venue: Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published: 2013
ISSN: 1863-2246 (ISSN-L)
1863-2351
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-34359-9
OpenAlex: W1572406658
Cited by: 292
References: 0
FWCI: 8.59
Type: book
Language: en
Open access: green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review