Wer ist gefährdet? Risikofaktoren für Internetsucht
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Müller suggests that Internet addiction correlates with increased neuroticism scores.
“Moreover, a study by Müller [55] suggests that Internet addiction correlates with increased neuroticism scores.”
From Social media addiction: associations with attachment style, mental distress, and personality (2024) · cites this paper as Müller [55]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Social media addiction: associations with attachment style, mental distress, and personality
Eichenberg, C., Schneider, R., & Rumpl, H. (2024) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-024-05709-z · Cited by 60 · see citing works
“Moreover, a study by Müller [55] suggests that Internet addiction correlates with increased neuroticism scores.”
Background
- Authors
- Müller, K.
- Affiliations
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Müller, Kai
- ORCID
- Müller, Kai
- Venue
- Spielwiese Internet
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2013
- Pages
- 67-84
- OpenAlex
- W50889930
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- de
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
- Keywords
- internet addiction, risk factors, personality, social environment, video games, alcoholism, substance use, prevalence of internet addiction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
