Ageing, Technology Anxiety and Intuitive Use of Complex Interfaces
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Older age groups performed better under anxious conditions and did not make significantly more errors compared with younger age groups on either interface structure.
“In their study, older age groups performed better under anxious conditions and did not make significantly more errors compared with younger age groups on either interface structures.”
From Intuitive Learnability of Touch Gestures for Technology-Naive Older Adults (2015) · cites this paper as Gudur et al., 2013
Gudur et al. (2013) showed the same results when comparing interface structures in a touch-based environment.
“Reporting on the same experiment, Gudur et al. (2013) showed the same results when comparing the interface structures in a touch-based environment.”
From Intuitive Learnability of Touch Gestures for Technology-Naive Older Adults (2015) · cites this paper as Gudur et al., 2013
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 47 · Cited by 16
- Authors
- Gudur, R. R., Blackler, A., Popovic, V., & Mahar, D.
- Affiliations
- Queensland University of Technology (AU)
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2013
- Volume
- LNCS-8119
- Issue
- Part III
- Pages
- 564-581
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- 1611-3349
- OpenAlex
- W2140175407
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3
- FWCI
- 6.88
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- eprints.qut.edu.au
- Locations
- Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
- QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Creative Industries Faculty
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
- Keywords
- aging, technology anxiety, older adults, complex interfaces, flat interface, interface complexity, self-efficacy, task performance, user errors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
