The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Knowledge Graph Identification
Open accessAbstract
Large-scale information processing systems are able to extract massive collections of interrelated facts, but unfortunately transforming these candidate facts into useful knowledge is a formidable challenge. In this paper, we show how uncertain extractions about entities and their relations can be transformed into a knowledge graph. The extractions form an extraction graph and we refer to the task of removing noise, inferring missing information, and determining which candidate facts should be included into a knowledge graph as knowledge graph identification. In order to perform this task, we must reason jointly about candidate facts and their associated extraction confidences, identify co-referent entities, and incorporate ontological constraints. Our proposed approach uses probabilistic soft logic (PSL), a recently introduced probabilistic modeling framework which easily scales to millions of facts. We demonstrate the power of our method on a synthetic Linked Data corpus derived from the MusicBrainz music community and a real-world set of extractions from the NELL project containing over 1M extractions and 70K ontological relations. We show that compared to existing methods, our approach is able to achieve improved AUC and F1 with significantly lower running time.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Toward an architecture for never-ending language learning
Carlson, A., Betteridge, J., Kisiel, B., Settles, B., Hruschka, E., & Mitchell, T. (2010) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v24i1.7519 · Cited by 2,000
Cited by
Knowledge vault: a web-scale approach to probabilistic knowledge fusion
Dong, X., Gabrilovich, E., Heitz, G., Horn, W., Lao, N., Murphy, K., Strohmann, T., Sun, S., & Zhang, W. (2014) · Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining · doi:10.1145/2623330.2623623 · Cited by 1,533
A review: Knowledge reasoning over knowledge graph
Chen, X., Jia, S., & Xiang, Y. (2020) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2019.112948 · Cited by 1,035
Marrying Uncertainty and Time in Knowledge Graphs
Chekol, M., Pirrò, G., Schoenfisch, J., & Stuckenschmidt, H. (2017) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v31i1.10495 · Cited by 24
Machine Learning for Refining Knowledge Graphs: A Survey
Subagdja, B., Shanthoshigaa, D., Wang, Z., & Tan, A.-H. (2024) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3640313 · Cited by 24
Artificial subjectivity: Personal semantic memory model for cognitive agents
Munir, A.-E.-H., & Qazi, W. M. (2022) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app12041903 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Pujara, J., Miao, H., Getoor, L., & Cohen, W.
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2013
- Pages
- 542-557
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- 1611-3349
- OpenAlex
- W1942169943
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.59
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.