Cited by 40Cancer survivorship and careCutaneous Melanoma Detection and ManagementPatient-Provider Communication in Healthcare

How to Identify Patients in Need of Psychological Intervention

Strittmatter, Gerhard, Tilkorn, Marlene, Mawick, Reinhard·2002·Recent Results in Cancer Research

Abstract

The identification of skin cancer patients in need of psychosocial intervention is a necessary prerequisite to relieving their distress and specifically supporting their coping strategies. The influence of early support even on prognosis has been shown in melanoma patients. Only a few patients ask for support themselves. The workload of doctors and nurses limits their ability to identify patients in need of support. Conducting interviews during daily hospital routine is time-consuming and cannot be implemented adequately. The screening of psychosocial risk patients needs to be based on standardized instruments. They should be easy to implement during the every-day routine. The Hornheide questionnaire with 27 items, the short form of the questionnaire with 9 items, and the Hornheide Screening Instrument (HSI) with 7 interview questions have been developed to achieve this aim in skin cancer patients. The Hornheide questionnaire offers a differentiated analysis of distress, and facilitates an accurate intervention according to the individual distress of the patient. The short form does not provide a differentiated analysis of distress. Its advantage is the speedy identification of patients at psychosocial risk. The HSI is for use during the anamnestic interview. In correlation with reduction of hospitalization time the HSI is most practicable for routine clinical implementation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-642-59410-6_40

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Strittmatter, G., Tilkorn, M., & Mawick, R.
Affiliations
  • Fachklinik Hornheide (DE)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
Venue
Recent Results in Cancer Research
Published
2002
Volume
160
Pages
353-361
ISSN
0080-0015 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2204313677
Cited by
40
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.60
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Recent results in cancer research/Recent Results in Cancer Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Keywords
skin cancer, psychosocial interventions, psychological distress, patient identification, psychosocial risk screening, coping strategies, melanoma, hospital routines, length of hospital stay
MeSH terms
Female, Health Services Needs and Demand, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Skin Neoplasms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review