Cited by 22Digital Mental Health InterventionsCancer survivorship and careMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Demands and needs for psycho-oncological ehealth interventions in women with cancer: cross-sectional study.

Open access
Ringwald, Johanna, Marwedel, Lennart, Junne, Florian, Ziser, Katrin, Schäffeler, Norbert, Gerstner, Lena, Wallwiener, Markus, Brucker, Sara Yvonne +3 more·2017·JMIR Cancer

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Over the last decade, a growing body of studies regarding the application of eHealth and various digital interventions has been published and are widely used in the psycho-oncological care. However, the effectiveness of eHealth applications in psycho-oncological care is still questioned due to missing considerations regarding evidence-based studies on the demands and needs in cancer-affected patients. OBJECTIVE: This cross-sectional study aimed to explore the cancer-affected women's needs and wishes for psycho-oncological content topics in eHealth applications and whether women with cancer differ in their content topics and eHealth preferences regarding their experienced psychological burden. METHODS: Patients were recruited via an electronic online survey through social media, special patient Internet platforms, and patient networks (both inpatients and outpatients, University Hospital Tuebingen, Germany). Participant demographics, preferences for eHealth and psycho-oncological content topics, and their experienced psychological burden of distress, quality of life, and need for psychosocial support were evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 1172 patients who responded, 716 were included in the study. The highest preference for psycho-oncological content topics reached anxiety, ability to cope, quality of life, depressive feelings, and adjustment toward a new life situation. eHealth applications such as Web-based applications, websites, blogs, info email, and consultation hotline were considered to be suitable to convey these content topics. Psychological burden did not influence the preference rates according to psycho-oncological content and eHealth applications. CONCLUSIONS: Psycho-oncological eHealth applications may be very beneficial for women with cancer, especially when they address psycho-oncological content topics like anxiety, ability to cope, depressive feelings, self-esteem, or adjustment to a new life situation. The findings of this study indicate that psycho-oncological eHealth applications are a promising medium to improve the psychosocial care and enhance individual disease management and engagement among women with cancer.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/cancer.7973

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [27]Baker L Wagner TH Singer S Bundorf MK Use of the Internet and e-mail for health care information: results from a national survey JAMA 2003 5 14 289 18 2400 2406 10.1001/jama.289.18.2400 12746364 12746364 · DOI · Paper page
  2. [54]Moyer A Goldenberg M Schneider S Sohl S Knapp S Psychosocial interventions for cancer patients and outcomes related to religion or spirituality: a systematic review and meta-analysis World J Psycho-Social Oncol 2014 3 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ringwald, J., Marwedel, L., Junne, F., Ziser, K., Schäffeler, N., Gerstner, L., Wallwiener, M., Brucker, S. Y., Hautzinger, M., Zipfel, S., & Teufel, M.
Affiliations
  • Universitätsklinikum Tübingen (DE)
  • University Hospital Heidelberg (DE)
  • University of Tübingen (DE)
  • University of Duisburg-Essen (DE)
Corresponding author
Ringwald, Johanna
Venue
JMIR Cancer
Published
2017-11-24
Volume
3
Issue
2
Pages
e19
ISSN
2369-1999 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2770150813
Cited by
22
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3
FWCI
2.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JMIR Cancer (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
psycho-oncology, digital health interventions, women with cancer, patient needs and preferences, psychological distress, anxiety, depression, coping, quality of life, psychosocial support, digital health applications, self-esteem, adaptation to illness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review