Demands and needs for psycho-oncological ehealth interventions in women with cancer: cross-sectional study.
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Over the last decade, a growing body of studies regarding the application of eHealth and various digital interventions has been published and are widely used in the psycho-oncological care. However, the effectiveness of eHealth applications in psycho-oncological care is still questioned due to missing considerations regarding evidence-based studies on the demands and needs in cancer-affected patients. OBJECTIVE: This cross-sectional study aimed to explore the cancer-affected women's needs and wishes for psycho-oncological content topics in eHealth applications and whether women with cancer differ in their content topics and eHealth preferences regarding their experienced psychological burden. METHODS: Patients were recruited via an electronic online survey through social media, special patient Internet platforms, and patient networks (both inpatients and outpatients, University Hospital Tuebingen, Germany). Participant demographics, preferences for eHealth and psycho-oncological content topics, and their experienced psychological burden of distress, quality of life, and need for psychosocial support were evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 1172 patients who responded, 716 were included in the study. The highest preference for psycho-oncological content topics reached anxiety, ability to cope, quality of life, depressive feelings, and adjustment toward a new life situation. eHealth applications such as Web-based applications, websites, blogs, info email, and consultation hotline were considered to be suitable to convey these content topics. Psychological burden did not influence the preference rates according to psycho-oncological content and eHealth applications. CONCLUSIONS: Psycho-oncological eHealth applications may be very beneficial for women with cancer, especially when they address psycho-oncological content topics like anxiety, ability to cope, depressive feelings, self-esteem, or adjustment to a new life situation. The findings of this study indicate that psycho-oncological eHealth applications are a promising medium to improve the psychosocial care and enhance individual disease management and engagement among women with cancer.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Spirituality, sense-making, and dealing with children were also relevant for eHealth interventions in this sample.
“Spirituality, sense-making, and dealing with children were also relevant for eHealth interventions in this sample.”
From Mindfulness and skills-based eHealth intervention to reduce distress in cancer-affected patients in the Reduct trial: Intervention protocol of the make it training optimized (2022) · cites this paper as [47]
The Discussion (Principal Findings) says spirituality, sense-making, and dealing with children had no high relevance for eHealth interventions in this sample. The Interpretation of our Findings also says spirituality and sense-making were considered less important, contrary to presenting these topics as relevant intervention priorities. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredeHealth applications were considered suitable for conveying these content topics.
“In addition, eHealth applications (including web-based applications, websites, blogs, information e-mails, and consultation hotlines) were considered suitable for conveying these content topics.”
The pre-study by Ringwald et al. included 716 patients.
“Seven hundred sixteen patients were included in the study.”
The content topics with the highest preference were anxiety, ability to cope, quality of life, depressive feelings, and adjustment to a new life situation.
“The content topics with the highest preference were anxiety, ability to cope, quality of life, depressive feelings, and adjustment to a new life situation.”
Patients' subjective psychological burden regarding distress, quality of life, and need for psychosocial support did not influence the preference rates for psycho-oncological contents and eHealth applications.
“The patients’ subjective psychological burden regarding distress, quality of life, and need for psychosocial support did not influence the preference rates for psycho-oncological contents and eHealth applications.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
EQ-SD: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group
Rabin, R., & Charro, F. D. (2001) · Annals of Medicine · doi:10.3109/07853890109002087 · Cited by 5,613 · see citing works
Webb, T. L., Joseph, J., Yardley, L., & Michie, S. (2010) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.1376 · Cited by 2,517 · see citing works
Psychosomatic medicine in Germany: more timely than ever
Zipfel, S., Herzog, W., Kruse, J., & Henningsen, P. (2016) · Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics · doi:10.1159/000447701 · Cited by 2,323 · see citing works
Self-citationAnxiety and depression after cancer diagnosis: Prevalence rates by cancer type, gender, and age
Linden, W., Vodermaier, A., MacKenzie, R., & Greig, D. (2012) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2012.03.025 · Cited by 1,245 · see citing works
Use of the Internet and E-mail for Health Care Information: Results From a National Survey
Baker, L., Wagner, T. H., Singer, S., & Bundorf, M. K. (2003) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.289.18.2400 · Cited by 1,129 · see citing works
Runowicz, C. D., Leach, C. R., Henry, N. L., Henry, K. S., Mackey, H. T., Cowens-Alvarado, R. L., Cannady, R. S., Pratt-Chapman, M. L., Edge, S. B., Jacobs, L. A., et al. (2016) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2015.64.3809 · Cited by 1,071 · see citing works
Faller, H., Schuler, M., Richard, M., Heckl, U., Weis, J., & Küffner, R. (2013) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2011.40.8922 · Cited by 912 · see citing works
eHealth Literacy: Extending the Digital Divide to the Realm of Health Information
Neter, E., & Brainin, E. (2012) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.1619 · Cited by 863 · see citing works
Four-Week Prevalence of Mental Disorders in Patients With Cancer Across Major Tumor Entities
Mehnert, A., Brähler, E., Faller, H., Härter, M., Keller, M., Schulz, H., Wegscheider, K., Weis, J., Boehncke, A., Hund, B., et al. (2014) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2014.56.0086 · Cited by 649 · see citing works
Screening for Distress and Unmet Needs in Patients With Cancer: Review and Recommendations
Carlson, L. E., Waller, A., & Mitchell, A. J. (2012) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2011.39.5509 · Cited by 550 · see citing works
Distress Management Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology
(2003) · Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network · doi:10.6004/jnccn.2003.0031 · Cited by 506 · see citing works
Mehnert, A., Müller, D., Lehmann, C., & Koch, U. (2006) · Zeitschrift für Psychiatrie, Psychologie und Psychotherapie · doi:10.1024/1661-4747.54.3.213 · Cited by 440 · see citing works
eHealth for Patient Engagement: A Systematic Review
Barello, S., Triberti, S., Graffigna, G., Libreri, C., Serino, S., Hibbard, J., & Riva, G. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.02013 · Cited by 411 · see citing works
Prevalence of mental health conditions in cancer patients in acute care—a meta-analysis
Singer, S., Das-Munshi, J., & Brähler, E. (2010) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdp515 · Cited by 392 · see citing works
Bender, J. L., Yue, R. Y. K., To, M. J., Deacken, L., & Jadad, A. R. (2013) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.2661 · Cited by 346 · see citing works
A Comparison of Imputation Techniques for Handling Missing Data
Musil, C. M., Warner, C. B., Yobas, P. K., & Jones, S. L. (2002) · Western Journal of Nursing Research · doi:10.1177/019394502762477004 · Cited by 301 · see citing works
Casellas-Grau, A., Font, A., & Vives, J. (2014) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.3353 · Cited by 299 · cited 1× · see citing works
“A variety of psycho-oncology interventions have been developed to support cancer-affected patients during and after treatment to reduce unmet supportive care needs [18-20].”
Breast cancer survivors' supportive care needs 2–10 years after diagnosis
Hodgkinson, K., Butow, P., Hunt, G. E., Pendlebury, S., Hobbs, K. M., & Wain, G. (2007) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-006-0170-2 · Cited by 295 · see citing works
Dilworth, S., Higgins, I., Parker, V., Kelly, B., & Turner, J. (2014) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.3474 · Cited by 286 · see citing works
Zebrack, B. J., Block, R., Hayes‐Lattin, B., Embry, L., Aguilar, C., Meeske, K. A., Li, Y., Butler, M., & Cole, S. (2013) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.27713 · Cited by 268 · see citing works
A systematic review of eHealth interventions to improve health literacy
Jacobs, R. J., Lou, J. Q., Ownby, R. L., & Caballero, J. (2016) · Health Informatics Journal · doi:10.1177/1460458214534092 · Cited by 249 · see citing works
Butow, P. N., Phillips, F., Schweder, J., White, K., Underhill, C. R., & Goldstein, D. (2011) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-011-1270-1 · Cited by 242 · see citing works
Satisfaction with information and unmet information needs in men and women with cancer
Faller, H., Koch, U., Brähler, E., Härter, M. C., Keller, M., Schulz, H., Wegscheider, K., Weis, J., Boehncke, A., Hund, B., et al. (2015) · Journal of Cancer Survivorship · doi:10.1007/s11764-015-0451-1 · Cited by 229 · see citing works
Boyes, A., Girgis, A., D’Este, C. A., & Zucca, A. C. (2012) · BMC Cancer · doi:10.1186/1471-2407-12-150 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
Jansen, F., van Uden-Kraan, C. F., van Zwieten, V., Witte, B. I., & Verdonck-de Leeuw, I. M. (2015) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-014-2514-7 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
Akizuki, N., Yamawaki, S., Akechi, T., Nakano, T., & Uchitomi, Y. (2005) · Journal of Pain and Symptom Management · doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2004.04.016 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
Why do oncology outpatients who report emotional distress decline help?
Clover, K. A., Mitchell, A. J., Britton, B., & Carter, G. (2015) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.3729 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
A systematic review of types and efficacy of online interventions for cancer patients.
McAlpine, H., Joubert, L., Martin-Sanchez, F., Merolli, M., & Drummond, K. J. (2015) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2014.11.002 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Carey, M. L., Lambert, S., Smits, R., Paul, C. L., Sanson‐Fisher, R., & Clinton‐McHarg, T. (2011) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-011-1327-1 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
A literature review of the social and psychological needs of ovarian cancer survivors
Roland, K. B., Rodriguez, J. L., Patterson, J. R., & Trivers, K. F. (2013) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.3322 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
The psychosocial needs of cancer patients: findings from an observational study
McIllmurray, M. B., Thomas, C., Francis, B. J., Morris, S., Soothill, K., & Al-Hamad, A. (2001) · European Journal of Cancer Care · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2354.2001.00280.x · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Ryhänen, A. M., Siekkinen, M., Rankinen, S., Korvenranta, H., & Leino‐Kilpi, H. (2009) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2009.08.005 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Agboola, S. O., Ju, W., Elfiky, A., Kvedar, J. C., & Jethwani, K. (2015) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.4009 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Baker‐Glenn, E. A., Park, B., Granger, L., Symonds, P., & Mitchell, A. J. (2011) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.1759 · Cited by 130 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Up to half of all patients express a need for psycho-oncological care to cope with the disease [6,7].”
A review of psychosocial needs of breast‐cancer patients and their relatives
Schmid‐Büchi, S., Halfens, R. J. G., Dassen, T. W. N., & van den Borne, B. H. P. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02490.x · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Lubberding, S., van Uden-Kraan, C. V., Velde, E. A. T., Cuijpers, P., Leemans, C., & Leeuw, I. V. V.-D. (2015) · Journal of Clinical Nursing · doi:10.1111/jocn.12753 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Pauwels, E., Charlier, C., Bourdeaudhuij, I. D., Lechner, L., & Hoof, E. V. (2011) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.2069 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Chemotherapy in patients with recurrent and progressive central neurocytoma
Brandes, A. A., Amist�, P., Gardiman, M. P., Volpin, L., Danieli, D., Guglielmi, B., Carollo, C., Pinna, G., Turazzi, S., & Monfardini, S. (2000) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(20000101)88:1 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Utilization of professional psychological care in a large German sample of cancer patients
Faller, H., Weis, J., Koch, U., Brähler, E., Härter, M. C., Keller, M., Schulz, H., Wegscheider, K., Boehncke, A., Hund, B., et al. (2016) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.4197 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Ruland, C. M., Maffei, R. M., Børøsund, E., Krahn, A., Andersen, T., & Grimsbø, G. H. (2013) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.02.007 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Geue, K., Schmidt, R., Sender, A., Sauter, S., & Friedrich, M. (2015) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.3805 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Kim, S. C., Shah, D. V., Namkoong, K., Mctavish, F. M., & Gustafson, D. H. (2013) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/jcc4.12002 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Børøsund, E., Cvancarova, M., Ekstedt, M., Moore, S. M., & Ruland, C. M. (2013) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.2285 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
eHealth for Breast Cancer Survivors: Use, Feasibility and Impact of an Interactive Portal
Kuijpers, W., Groen, W. G., Oldenburg, H. S., Wouters, M. W., Aaronson, N. K., & van Harten, W. H. (2016) · JMIR Cancer · doi:10.2196/cancer.5456 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Psychosocial issues experienced by young women with breast cancer
Ahmad, S., Fergus, K. D., & McCarthy, M. C. (2015) · Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care · doi:10.1097/spc.0000000000000162 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Schäffeler, N., Pfeiffer, K., Ringwald, J., Brucker, S. Y., Wallwiener, M., Zipfel, S., & Teufel, M. (2015) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.3855 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Self-citationCancer Patients' Self-Reported Attitudes About the Internet
LaCoursiere, S. P., Knobf, M. T., & McCorkle, R. C. (2005) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.7.3.e22 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
How to Identify Patients in Need of Psychological Intervention
Strittmatter, G., Tilkorn, M., & Mawick, R. (2002) · Recent Results in Cancer Research · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-59410-6_40 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
EHealth acceptance and new media preferences for therapy assistance among breast cancer patients.
Drewes, C., Kirkovits, T., Schiltz, D., Schinkoethe, T., Haidinger, R., Goldmann-Posch, U., Harbeck, N., & Wuerstlein, R. (2016) · JMIR Cancer · doi:10.2196/cancer.5711 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Brédart, A., Merdy, O., Sigal‐Zafrani, B., Fiszer, C., Dolbeault, S., & Hardouin, J.-B. (2015) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-015-2799-1 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Cox-Martin, E., Basen-Engquist, K. M., Cox, M. G., Lyons, E., Carmack, C. L., Blalock, J. A., & Demark‐Wahnefried, W. (2016) · JMIR Cancer · doi:10.2196/cancer.5247 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Online Social Engagement by Cancer Patients: A Clinic-Based Patient Survey
An, L. C., Wallner, L. P., & Kirch, M. (2016) · JMIR Cancer · doi:10.2196/cancer.5785 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Nekolaichuk, C., Turner, J., Collie, K., Cumming, C. E., & Stevenson, A. (2012) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732312470567 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Teufel, M., Schäffeler, N., de Zwaan, M., Graap, H., Zipfel, S., & Giel, K. E. (2011) · Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1177/1359105311401671 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Self-citationThe prevalence of psychological distress by cancer site
Zabora, J., BrintzenhofeSzoc, K., Curbow, B., Hooker, C., & Piantadosi, S. (2001) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/1099-1611(200101/02)10:1
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [27]Baker L Wagner TH Singer S Bundorf MK Use of the Internet and e-mail for health care information: results from a national survey JAMA 2003 5 14 289 18 2400 2406 10.1001/jama.289.18.2400 12746364 12746364 · DOI · Paper page
- [54]Moyer A Goldenberg M Schneider S Sohl S Knapp S Psychosocial interventions for cancer patients and outcomes related to religion or spirituality: a systematic review and meta-analysis World J Psycho-Social Oncol 2014 3 1
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ghanbari, E., Yektatalab, S., & Mehrabi, M. (2021) · JMIR mHealth and uHealth · doi:10.2196/19262 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Ringwald, J., Gerstner, L., Junne, F., Ziser, K., Schäffeler, N., Wallwiener, M., Hautzinger, M., Bäuerle, A., Brucker, S., Zipfel, S., et al. (2019) · PPmP - Psychotherapie · Psychosomatik · Medizinische Psychologie · doi:10.1055/a-0835-6905 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Self-citationHeinen, J., Bäuerle, A., Schug, C., Krakowczyk, J. B., Strunk, S. E., Wieser, A., Beckord, J., Jansen, C., Dries, S., Pantförder, M., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1037158 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Self-citationSchlecht, S., Neubert, S., Meng, K., Rabe, A., & Jentschke, E. (2023) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph20206933 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ringwald, J., Marwedel, L., Junne, F., Ziser, K., Schäffeler, N., Gerstner, L., Wallwiener, M., Brucker, S. Y., Hautzinger, M., Zipfel, S., & Teufel, M.
- Affiliations
- Universitätsklinikum Tübingen (DE)
- University Hospital Heidelberg (DE)
- University of Tübingen (DE)
- University of Duisburg-Essen (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Ringwald, Johanna
- ORCID
- Venue
- JMIR Cancer
- Publisher
- JMIR Publications Inc.
- Published
- 2017-11-24
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- e19
- ISSN
- 2369-1999 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5722981
- OpenAlex
- W2770150813
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 2.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- JMIR Cancer (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
- Keywords
- psycho-oncology, digital health interventions, women with cancer, patient needs and preferences, psychological distress, anxiety, depression, coping, quality of life, psychosocial support, digital health applications, self-esteem, adaptation to illness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review