Alternative Error Term Specifications in the Log-Tobit Model1
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Other studies have proposed a log-transformation of the Tobit model with a multiplicative exponential error term.
“Other studies, facing similar problems in terms of similar characteristics of skewness and departure from normality, have proposed a log-transformation of the Tobit model with a multiplicative exponential error term (Filippucci, Drudi, and Papalia, 1996;Papalia and Di Iorio, 2001).”
From Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms (2006) · cites this paper as Papalia and Di Iorio, 2001
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.507 · Cited by 6,324 · see citing works
- Authors
- Papalia, R. B., & Di Iorio, F.
- Affiliations
- University of Perugia (IT)
- Venue
- Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2001
- Pages
- 185-192
- ISSN
- 1431-8814 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W212398445
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Studies in classification, data analysis, and knowledge organization (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
- Keywords
- Tobit model, logarithmic transformation, heteroscedasticity, censored data, estimator properties, Monte Carlo simulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review