Cited by 6,334Innovation and Knowledge ManagementFirm Innovation and GrowthBusiness Strategy and Innovation

Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms

Open access
Laursen, Keld, Salter, Ammon·2006·Strategic Management Journal

Abstract

Abstract A central part of the innovation process concerns the way firms go about organizing search for new ideas that have commercial potential. New models of innovation have suggested that many innovative firms have changed the way they search for new ideas, adopting open search strategies that involve the use of a wide range of external actors and sources to help them achieve and sustain innovation. Using a large‐scale sample of industrial firms, this paper links search strategy to innovative performance, finding that searching widely and deeply is curvilinearly (taking an inverted U‐shape) related to performance. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/smj.507

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

1 of 30 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Findingown data

    Firms with open search strategies-those that search widely and deeply-tend to be more innovative.

    “We find that firms who have open search strategies-those who search widely and deeply-tend to be more innovative.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    The relationship between openness (searching widely and deeply) and innovative performance is curvilinear, taking an inverted U-shape, with decreasing returns beyond some point.

    “finding that searching widely and deeply is curvilinearly (taking an inverted U-shape) related to performance.”
    • Also stated in: § INTRODUCTION · hedged
      “However, we find that the benefits to openness are subject to decreasing returns, indicating that there is a point where additional search becomes unproductive.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    The parameters for R&D intensity, scope of the market, and collaboration in innovative activities are consistently positive and significant in explaining the proportion of sales due to novel products, regardless of novelty degree.

    “Of our control variables, the parameters for R&D intensity (RDINT), the scope of the market (GEOMARKET), and collaboration in innovative activities (COLLAB) are consistently positive and significant in explaining the proportion of sales due Strat.Mgmt.J., 27: 131-150 (2006) to novel products no matter the degree of novelty of the product.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The residuals of the Tobit model follow a lognormal distribution.
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The latent variable of innovative performance of a firm is a function of a number of explicative variables.
  • Findingown data

    Chemicals, electrical and machinery industries exhibit the highest level of external search breadth.

    “Chemicals, electrical and machinery industries exhibit the highest level of external search breath, indicating that firms in industries with medium to high levels of scientific and technological activity search widely.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Whether or not the firm is a start-up has no positive influence on innovative performance.

    “Whether or not the firm is a start-up has no positive influence on innovative performance, no matter whether or not this is conditional on the R&D intensity of the firm.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The residuals of the Tobit model follow a lognormal distribution.
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The latent variable of innovative performance of a firm is a function of a number of explicative variables.
  • May combine two claims. 17
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 34
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Patent data are a flawed measure of innovation and the search that produces it.

    “These studies are largely based on analysis of patent citation data and patents have several serious shortcomings as indicators of innovation and innovative search.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Teece, 1986 source
    • cites Levin et al., 1987 source

      The Abstract (page unavailable) says industries differ substantially in patents generated per dollar of R&D and discusses the need to improve research that uses patent counts to measure innovative activity. This supports a limitation of patents as indicators of innovation, but our copy does not establish the claimed shortcomings of patent citation data as indicators of innovative search. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Alcacer and Gittelman, 2004

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    While there are decreasing returns in innovation for increased openness in terms of breadth, no negative returns are detected.

    “The results indicate that while there are decreasing returns in innovation for increased openness in terms of breadth, no negative returns are to be detected.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The residuals of the Tobit model follow a lognormal distribution.
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The latent variable of innovative performance of a firm is a function of a number of explicative variables.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The dummies below the benchmark for BREADTH all have a negative sign, but only the dummy for the value of 0 is significant.

    “The results show that the dummies below the benchmark all have a negative sign-as expected-but only the dummy for the value of 0 is significant.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The residuals of the Tobit model follow a lognormal distribution.
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The latent variable of innovative performance of a firm is a function of a number of explicative variables.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The results indicate that while there are decreasing returns in innovation for increased openness in terms of external search depth, there are negative returns for 9-16 sources only.

    “Accordingly, the results indicate that while there are decreasing returns in innovation for increased openness in terms of external search depth, there are negative returns for 9-16 sources only.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The residuals of the Tobit model follow a lognormal distribution.
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The latent variable of innovative performance of a firm is a function of a number of explicative variables.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    On average, 4.94 percent of firms' turnover pertains to innovations new to the firm.

    “while 4.94 percent of firms' turnover pertain to innovations new to the firm (INNFIRM)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Both external search breadth and depth are highest in industries with high levels of R&D intensity and rates of innovation.

    “Both the level of external search breadth and depth are highest in industries with high levels of R&D intensity and rates of innovation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    On average, firms use about seven sources of knowledge for innovative activities.

    “Moreover, on average, firms use about seven sources of knowledge for their innovative activities”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The parameters for lead users are significant for radical and incremental innovation, but not for the intermediate category (INNFIRM).

    “The parameters for lead users (USER) are significant for radical and well as for incremental innovation, but not for the intermediate category (INNFIRM).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The residuals of the Tobit model follow a lognormal distribution.
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The latent variable of innovative performance of a firm is a function of a number of explicative variables.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The dummy above the benchmark for BREADTH is positive but insignificant.

    “The dummy above the benchmark is positive but insignificant.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The residuals of the Tobit model follow a lognormal distribution.
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The latent variable of innovative performance of a firm is a function of a number of explicative variables.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    On average, 2.81 percent of firms' turnover can be attributed to products new to the world.

    “From the table it can be seen that on, average, 2.81 percent of firms' turnover can be attributed to products new to the world (INNWORLD)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The interaction effects between R&D intensity and both BREADTH and DEPTH are significant at the 5 percent level but have negative signs.

    “In fact, from Model VII in Table 5, it can be seen that the interaction effects between R&D intensity and both BREADTH and DEPTH are significant at the 5 percent level, but they have negative signs, indicating a substitution effect between internal R&D and openness.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The residuals of the Tobit model follow a lognormal distribution.
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The latent variable of innovative performance of a firm is a function of a number of explicative variables.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The parameter for DEPTH is highest for INNWORLD, lower for INNFIRM, and smallest for INNIMP (insignificant).

    “The parameter for DEPTH of openness is the highest in the case of INNWORLD, while INNFIRM is lower and the parameter for INNIMP is the smallest to the extent that it is insignificant.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The residuals of the Tobit model follow a lognormal distribution.
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The latent variable of innovative performance of a firm is a function of a number of explicative variables.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Internal R&D spending no longer provides the same strategic benefits as before.

    “This model suggests that the advantages that firms gain from internal R&D expenditure have declined.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Chesbrough, 2003a

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation

    The U.K. innovation survey received a response rate of 41.7 percent.

    “It received a response rate of 41.7 percent (Stockdale, 2002).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Stockdale, 2002

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    R&D plays a dual role: it produces new knowledge and also builds the firm's capacity to absorb and use knowledge that already exists.

    “In contrast, Cohen andLevinthal (1989, 1990) argue that R&D has two faces: not only does R&D generate genuinely new knowledge; it also enhances the firm's ability to assimilate and exploit existing knowledge from the”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Cohen and Levinthal, 1989 source
    • cites Cohen and Levinthal, 1990 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    No large-scale empirical test of Chesbrough's open innovation model exists, and earlier search research has not looked at external actors and sources.

    “However, Chesbrough's work on the 'open innovation' model has not yet been empirically examined using a large-scale dataset and the previous literature on innovative search has not yet investigated the role of search among external actors and sources.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Many innovative firms have shifted to open search strategies involving a broad set of external actors and sources to support sustained innovation.

    “New models of innovation have suggested that many innovative firms have changed the way they search for new ideas, adopting open search strategies that involve the use of a wide range of external actors and sources to help them achieve and sustain innovation.”
    • Also stated in: § INTRODUCTION · hedged
      “Chesbrough (2003a) suggests that many innovative firms have shifted to an 'open innovation' model, using a wide range of external actors and sources to help them achieve and sustain innovation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Chesbrough, 2003a

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The sample was stratified by 12 Standard Industrial Classification classes and includes all main sectors of the U.K. economy, excluding public bodies, retail, and hotels and restaurants.

    “The sample was stratified by 12 Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) classes and includes all main sectors of the U.K. economy, excluding public bodies, retail, and hotels and restaurants.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The U.K. innovation survey's interpretability, reliability, and validity were established through extensive piloting and pre-testing across European countries and industrial sectors.

    “The interpretability, reliability, and validity of the survey were established by extensive piloting and pre-testing before implementation within different European countries and across firms from a variety of industrial sectors, including services, construction and manufacturing.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation

    The response rates for different sectors, regions, and size are largely consistent with the overall response pattern.

    “The response rates for different sectors, regions, and size are largely consistent with the overall response pattern (Stockdale, 2002).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Stockdale, 2002

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The subsample includes 2707 manufacturing firms and draws from the entire U.K. manufacturing sector.

    “Our subsample of the survey includes 2707 manufacturing firms and draw from the entire U.K. manufacturing sector.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    CIS data offer a direct measure of success in commercializing innovations for a broad range of industries that more traditional measures may not capture.

    “CIS data offer 'a direct measure of success in commercializing innovations for a broad range of industries . . .that more traditional measures may not capture' (Leiponen and Helfat, 2003).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Leiponen and Helfat, 2003

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    The study only distinguished between incremental and radical innovations.

    “A further limitation of the present paper has to do with the fact that we have focused on the distinction between incremental and radical innovations only.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The list of sources on the questionnaire is extensive and the items are not mutually exclusive.

    “Although the list of sources on the questionnaire is not fully comprehensive, it is extensive and the items are not mutually exclusive.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The variables reflecting innovative performance are highly skewed and better represented by lognormal distributions.

    “The variables reflecting the innovative performance of firms are highly skewed and, accordingly, the pattern observed in the empirical distribution is better represented by lognormal distributions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The study did not examine how the type and nature of a firm's technological trajectory, and its approach to that trajectory, might affect innovative performance.

    “While the present study examined different external search strategies for innovative ideas across different knowledge sources, it did not investigate the role of the type and nature of the technological trajectory that a firm may be exploring (as in the case of Katila and Ahuja) and how its approach to this trajectory may influence its innovative performance.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    The DEPTH COLLAB variable has a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.83.

    “As in the case of BREADTH and DEPTH, the eight dummies are subsequently added up so that each firm gets a score of 0 when no partners are used, while the firm gets a value of 8 when the firm is collaborating with all potential collaboration partners (Cronbach's alpha coefficient = 0.83).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The lack of openness of firms to their external environment may reflect an organizational myopia.

    “The lack of openness of firms to their external environment may reflect an organizational myopia, indicating that managers may overemphasize internal sources and under emphasize external sources.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    The BREADTH variable has a high degree of internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.93).

    “Although our variable is a relatively simple construct, it has a high degree of internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha coefficient = 0.93).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The sources listed in the survey overlap with the resources and institutions considered part of the national innovation system.

    “The sources listed in the survey overlap with the resources and institutions that are considered part of the national innovation system (Lundvall, 1992;Nelson, 1993;Spencer, 2001).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Lundvall, 1992

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Nelson, 1993 source
    • cites Spencer, 2001 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Firms that are too internally focused may miss opportunities, as many knowledge sources necessary to achieve innovation can only be found outside the firm.

    “As Chesbrough suggests, firms that are too internally focused may miss opportunities, as many knowledge sources necessary to achieve innovation can only be found outside the firm.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Chesbrough

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    This finding is consistent with previous studies.

    “This finding is consistent with the findings from previous studies (see Cohen, 1995;Laursen and Foss, 2003).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Cohen, 1995

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Laursen and Foss, 2003

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    The DEPTH variable has a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.76.

    “As in the case of BREADTH, the 16 sources are subsequently added up so that each firm gets a score of 0 when no knowledge sources are used to a high degree, while the firm gets the value of 16 when all knowledge sources are used to a high degree (Cronbach's alpha coefficient = 0.76).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Firms that produce simple or discrete technologies, or that depend on few knowledge bases, tend to search less broadly than firms developing complex technologies.

    “Past research suggests that firms producing simple or discrete technologies that are artefactually simple, that is, they involve relatively few components and clear interfaces between modules, or that rely on a small number of knowledge bases, will tend to search more narrowly than firms involved in the design and development of complex technologies (Nelson and Winter, 1982).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Nelson and Winter, 1982

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Openness to external sources allows firms to draw in ideas from outsiders to deepen the pool of technological opportunities available to them.

    “Openness to external sources allows firms to draw in ideas from outsiders to deepen the pool of technological opportunities available to them.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    A very similar variable to the search breadth measure was used by Laursen and Salter (2003) to predict firms' propensity to use university-developed knowledge.

    “However, a very similar variable to that of the variable measuring search breadth has been used byLaursen and Salter (2003) as a predictor of the propensity of firms to use knowledge developed at universities.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Laursen and Salter (2003)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    The study examined innovative search and performance in a single period, which is a major limitation.

    “Our approach focuses on innovative search and performance in one period and this remains a severe limitation of the study.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The substitution effect may also be the result of an additional attention allocation problem.

    “Moreover, it may also be the result of an additional attention allocation problem, since ideas are produced both internally and externally.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Other studies have proposed a log-transformation of the Tobit model with a multiplicative exponential error term.

    “Other studies, facing similar problems in terms of similar characteristics of skewness and departure from normality, have proposed a log-transformation of the Tobit model with a multiplicative exponential error term (Filippucci, Drudi, and Papalia, 1996;Papalia and Di Iorio, 2001).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Filippucci, Drudi, and Papalia, 1996

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Papalia and Di Iorio, 2001 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    One likely interpretation of the substitution effect is that it is the product of the NIH syndrome.

    “One likely interpretation of this result is that it is the product of the NIH syndrome-that greater attention to openness for external sources confronts internal resistance from some of the company's technical staff.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Complex technologies like aeroengines typically require firms to master many different knowledge bases and to understand how various components interface and integrate.

    “Complex technologies, such as aeroengines, often require firms to master a wide number of different knowledge bases and to understand the interfaces and integration of a range of different components (Brusoni, Prencipe, and Pavitt, 2001).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Brusoni, Prencipe, and Pavitt, 2001 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The framework used in this paper cannot analyze how breadth and depth of external search affect innovative performance within each separate knowledge channel.

    “As pointed out earlier in this paper, a limitation of the framework proposed here is that it does not allow for the analysis of the importance of breadth and depth of external search to innovative performance within each individual knowledge channel.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationnone given

    The introduction of the two new variables to reflect openness of innovative search enables researchers to better explore the link between innovative search and innovative performance.

    “Although the introduction of any variable into a well-established area of research is always contentious, the introduction of the two new variables to reflect the openness of innovative search does enable researchers to better explore the link between innovative search and innovative performance.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Leiponen and Helfat (2003) also use a similar search breadth variable.

    “AlsoLeiponen and Helfat (2003) use a similar search breadth variable.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Leiponen and Helfat (2003)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Many studies of innovation have found that lead users are a key source for innovations.

    “Given that many studies of innovation have found that a key source for innovations are lead users, we include a variable reflecting the use of lead users in innovation (Rothwell et al., 1974;Urban and von Hippel, 1988;von Hippel, 1988).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Rothwell et al., 1974 source
    • cites Urban and von Hippel, 1988 source
    • cites von Hippel, 1988

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

45 of 45
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The residuals of the Tobit model follow a lognormal distribution.

    “We apply this approach to the study of innovative performance and assume a lognormal distribution for the residuals of the Tobit model.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The latent variable of innovative performance of a firm is a function of a number of explicative variables.

    “It is then assumed that the latent variable of innovative performance of a firm i is a function of a number of explicative variables.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Firms are increasingly drawing in knowledge from external sources in their innovative activities.

    “Firms are increasingly drawing in knowledge from external sources in their innovative activities.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Modern innovation processes require firms to master highly specific knowledge about different users, technologies, and markets.

    “Modern innovation processes require firms to master highly specific knowledge about different users, technologies, and markets.”
4 of 4

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Breadth dummy range differs between the text and Table 5

    Minor

    The text says the highest breadth dummy covers 9-16 sources, but Table 5 uses 9-14 as the benchmark and a separate dummy for 15-16 sources.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 82 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Chesbrough H, 2003, Open Innovation
  2. Filippucci C, 1996, Testing the relevance of Tobin's approach for modelling consumption, Economic Notes, 25, 225
  3. Greene WH, 2000, Econometric Analysis
  4. LaursenK SalterAJ.2003.Searching low and high: why do firms cite universities as a source of innovation?Paper presented at the EMAEE 2003 Conference on the ‘Knowledge‐Based Economies: New Challenges in Methodology Theory and Policy’ Augsburg Germany.
  5. Pavitt KLR, 1989, Accumulation, diversification and organization of technological activities in U.K. companies, 1945–83, Management Science, 35, 81
  6. von Hippel E, 1988, The Sources of Innovation

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Laursen, K., & Salter, A.
Affiliations
  • Copenhagen Business School (DK)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Salter, Ammon
Venue
Strategic Management Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-11-21
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
131-150
ISSN
  • 0143-2095 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0266
OpenAlex
W2087712586
Cited by
6,324
References
82
Citations by year
2026: 336 · 2025: 337 · 2024: 357 · 2023: 381 · 2022: 423 · 2021: 406 · 2020: 430 · 2019: 424 · 2018: 444 · 2017: 438 · 2016: 366 · 2015: 373 · 2014: 383 · 2013: 313 · 2012: 276
FWCI
178.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Strategic Management Journal (publishedVersion)
  • CBS Research Portal (Copenhagen Business School) (publishedVersion)
  • Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Copenhagen Business School
  • Imperial College London
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
  • Economic and Social Research Council (RES-331-27-0005)
  • Intelligent Manufacturing Research Center
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Firm Innovation and Growth
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategy and Innovation
Keywords
open innovation, innovation performance, external knowledge sources, search strategies, manufacturing companies, curvilinear relationship, inverted U-shaped relationship

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-09-28.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-09-28.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review