Psychological Characteristics of Expert Decision Makers
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
People often expect experts to be precise and confident.
“people often expect experts to be precise and confident (Shanteau, 1987)”
From A review of the effects of uncertainty in public science communication (2020) · cites this paper as Shanteau, 1987
Cites
Acquisition of cognitive skill
Anderson, J. R. (1982) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.89.4.369 · Cited by 3,663 · see citing works
Lichtenstein, S., & Fischhoff, B. (1980) · Organizational Behavior and Human Performance · doi:10.1016/0030-5073(80)90052-5 · Cited by 375 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A review of the effects of uncertainty in public science communication
Gustafson, A., & Rice, R. E. (2020) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/0963662520942122 · Cited by 291 · see citing works
- Authors
- Shanteau, J.
- Affiliations
- Kansas State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Shanteau, James
- ORCID
- Shanteau, James
- Venue
- Expert Judgment and Expert Systems
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 1987
- Pages
- 289-304
- OpenAlex
- W44598474
- Cited by
- 102
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 7.48
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
- Keywords
- psychological characteristics, expertise, decision-making
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
