The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Einführung in die Operative Logik und Mathematik
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Lorenzen 1955 famously explained a valid consequence as a dialogical claim in an argumentation game, whose proponent has a winning strategy against any opponent granting the premises.”
From THE STORIES OF LOGIC AND INFORMATION (2008) · cites this paper as Lorenzen 1955
In the citing paper
“For instance, in the earlier-mentioned dialogue games of Lorenzen 1955, proof rules are game moves , and proofs are winning strategies for players.”
From THE STORIES OF LOGIC AND INFORMATION (2008) · cites this paper as Lorenzen 1955
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
THE STORIES OF LOGIC AND INFORMATION
van Benthem, J., & Martinez, M. (2008) · Philosophy of Information · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-51726-5.50012-1 · Cited by 80
Metadata
- Authors
- Lorenzen, P.
- Affiliations
- University of Bonn (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Lorenzen, Paul
- Venue
- Springer eBooks
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 1955
- OpenAlex
- W4251206353
- Cited by
- 219
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 10.35
- Type
- book
- Language
- de
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Mathematics and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Advanced Algebra and Logic
- Keywords
- intuitionistic logic, constructive mathematics, intuitionism, proof theory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
