The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cortex: Statistics and Geometry of Neuronal Connectivity
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This is because the high levels of recurrent connectivity in the source area (Braitenberg and Schüz 1998; Markov et al. 2011) can lead to labeled axon terminals in the vicinity of the retrogradely labeled cells that can be mistaken for long-distance anterograde labeling from the injected target area.”
From A Weighted and Directed Interareal Connectivity Matrix for Macaque Cerebral Cortex (2014) · cites this paper as Braitenberg and Schüz 1998
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems
Bullmore, E., & Sporns, O. (2009) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2575 · Cited by 11,820
“…29 . neurons and brain regions that are spatially close have a relatively high probability of being connected, whereas connections between spatially remote neurons or brain regions are less likely 30–32 . longer axonal projections are more expensive in terms of their material and energy costs 33 .”
BackgroundNeuronal Oscillations in Cortical Networks
Buzsáki, G., & Draguhn, A. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1099745 · Cited by 6,576
“connections are local (31), the period of oscil-”
BackgroundInfluentialSynchronization in complex networks
Arenas, A., Díaz-Guilera, A., Kurths, J., Moreno, Y., & Zhou, C. (2008) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2008.09.002 · Cited by 3,713
“Indeed, the wiring economy is apparent in the distributions of projection length in neural systems, which show that most neuronal projections are short [196,197].”
BackgroundWhat we can do and what we cannot do with fMRI
Logothetis, N. K. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06976 · Cited by 3,612
Why do many psychiatric disorders emerge during adolescence?
Paus, T., Keshavan, M., & Giedd, J. N. (2008) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2513 · Cited by 3,123
“If the number of synapses per se is unlikely to change the cortical volume and/or thickness, then what other cellular elements could affect it? Approximately 10% of the (mouse) cortex is occupied by glial cells and approximately 60% is occupied by neuropil, which consists of dendritic and axonal processe”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Braitenberg, V., & Schüz, A.
- Affiliations
- Max Planck Society (DE)
- Venue
- Springer eBooks
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 1998
- OpenAlex
- W1603661052
- Cited by
- 1,178
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 62 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 57 · 2018: 49 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 42 · 2015: 57 · 2014: 53 · 2013: 51 · 2012: 64
- FWCI
- 4.64
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- cerebral cortex, neuronal connectivity, cortical networks, mouse cortex, cortical geometry, corticocortical connections
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
