Global Unification of Height Systems and GOCE
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The GBVP approach has major drawbacks: use of different standards in different regions and restricted accessibility to terrestrial gravity data.
“Its major drawbacks, however, are the use of different standards in different regions (e.g. gravity data: gravity anomaly or gravity disturbance; tide systems: mean or zero tide system for computing the potential difference; gravity field models: different models with different spherical harmonic degree and order for removing the long-wavelength contributions) and the restricted accessibility to”
From Clock networks for height system unification: a simulation study (2019) · cites this paper as Rummel 2001
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Drewes, H., Kuglitsch, F., Adám, J., & Rózsa, S. (2016) · Journal of Geodesy · doi:10.1007/s00190-016-0948-z · Cited by 174 · see citing works
Determination of a high spatial resolution geopotential model using atomic clock comparisons
Lion, G., Panet, I., Wolf, P., Guerlin, C., Bize, S., & Delva, P. (2017) · Journal of Geodesy · doi:10.1007/s00190-016-0986-6 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Gerlach, C., & Rummel, R. (2013) · Journal of Geodesy · doi:10.1007/s00190-012-0579-y · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Self-citationClock networks for height system unification: a simulation study
Wu, H., Müller, J., & Lämmerzahl, C. (2019) · Geophysical Journal International · doi:10.1093/gji/ggy508 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
- Authors
- Rummel, R.
- Venue
- International Association of Geodesy Symposia
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2001
- Pages
- 13-20
- ISSN
- 0939-9585
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
