Führungskompetenzen der Zukunft
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Empirical studies and literature reviews/meta-analyses suggest a link between leadership and followers' health.
“Empirical studies (e.g., Felfe et al. 2014;Weiß and Süß 2016) and literature reviews and meta-analyses (Harms et al. 2017;Skakon et al. 2010) suggest a link between leadership and followers' health”
From Leadership and technostress: A systematic literature review (2025) · cites this paper as Felfe et al. 2014
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 55 · Cited by 18
- Authors
- Felfe, J., Ducki, A., & Franke, F.
- Affiliations
- Universität Hamburg (DE)
- Berliner Hochschule für Technik (DE)
- Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (DE)
- Venue
- Fehlzeiten-Report 2014
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2014
- Pages
- 139-148
- OpenAlex
- W301119613
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 22.25
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- de
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Leadership and Management in Organizations
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Corporate Management and Leadership
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Organizational Leadership and Management Strategies
- Keywords
- leadership skills, future of leadership, leadership models, demographic change, mental health risk, organizational change, globalization, job satisfaction, employee performance, employee health
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
