Cited by 162Pain Management and Placebo EffectPain Mechanisms and TreatmentsPain Management and Treatment

A meta-analysis of brain mechanisms of placebo analgesia: consistent findings and unanswered questions

Open access
Atlas, Lauren Y., Wager, Tor D.·2014·Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology

Abstract

Placebo treatments reliably reduce pain in the clinic and in the lab. Because pain is a subjective experience, it has been difficult to determine whether placebo analgesia is clinically relevant. Neuroimaging studies of placebo analgesia provide objective evidence of placebo-induced changes in brain processing and allow researchers to isolate the mechanisms underlying placebo-based pain reduction. We conducted formal meta-analyses of 25 neuroimaging studies of placebo analgesia and expectancy-based pain modulation. Results revealed that placebo effects and expectations for reduced pain elicit reliable reductions in activation during noxious stimulation in regions often associated with pain processing, including the dorsal anterior cingulate, thalamus, and insula. In addition, we observed consistent reductions during painful stimulation in the amygdala and striatum, regions implicated widely in studies of affect and valuation. This suggests that placebo effects are strongest on brain regions traditionally associated with not only pain, but also emotion and value more generally. Other brain regions showed reliable increases in activation with expectations for reduced pain. These included the prefrontal cortex (including dorsolateral, ventromedial, and orbitofrontal cortices), the midbrain surrounding the periaqueductal gray, and the rostral anterior cingulate. We discuss implications of these findings as well as how future studies can expand our understanding of the precise functional contributions of the brain systems identified here.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-662-44519-8_3

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • All parts of insula (posterior, mid and anterior) as well as cACC may be regulated by top-down systems during processing of bottom-up interoceptive input and processing of top-down induced activation in the interoceptive stream.

    “While it is not clear to what extent early interoceptive signals are prone to modulation, it has been shown that all parts of insula (posterior, mid and anterior) as well as cACC may be regulated by top-down systems during processing of bottom-up interoceptive input (Atlas and Wager, 2014) and processing of top-down induced activation in the interoceptive stream (Singer et al., 2006; Rutgen et al.”

    From Top-Down Dysregulation—From ADHD to Emotional Instability (2016) · cites this paper as Atlas and Wager, 2014

    The Results section (page unavailable) reports expectancy-associated reductions during noxious stimulation in anterior, middle, and left posterior insula and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex. This supports modulation during pain processing, but the paper does not establish that all posterior insula or the specifically named caudal ACC is regulated during bottom-up interoceptive processing generally. The later clause about top-down-induced activation is attached to other citations, not this one. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • lOFC has been activated in several placebo treatment studies, often in co-activation with rACC.

    “The lOFC has been activated in several placebo treatment studies (often in co-activation with rACC) as indicated by meta-analysis (Atlas and Wager, 2014; Wager and Atlas, 2015; Figure 6A) including placebo analgesia (Petrovic et al., 2002; Lieberman et al., 2004; Wager et al., 2004) and emotional placebo (Petrovic et al., 2005).”

    From Top-Down Dysregulation—From ADHD to Emotional Instability (2016) · cites this paper as Atlas and Wager, 2014

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 123 · Cited by 162

Research works printed but not linked: 82

  1. Apkarian AV, Bushnell MC, Treede R-D, Zubieta J-K (2005) Human brain mechanisms of pain perception and regulation in health and disease. Eur J Pain (Lond) 9: 463– 484 15979027
  2. Atlas LY, Wager TD (2013) Expectancies and beliefs: insights from cognitive neuroscience In: Ochsner KN, Kosslyn SM (eds) Oxford handbook of cognitive neuroscience. Oxford University Press, Oxford, NY, pp 359– 381
  3. Atlas LY, Bolger N, Lindquist MA, Wager TD (2010) Brain mediators of predictive cue effects on perceived pain. J Neurosci 30: 12964– 12977 20881115 PMC2966558
  4. Atlas LY, Whittington RA, Lindquist MA, Wielgosz J, Sonty N, Wager TD (2012) Dissociable influences of opiates and expectations on pain. J Neurosci 32: 8053– 8064 22674280 PMC3387557
  5. Baliki MN, Geha PY, Apkarian AV (2009) Parsing pain perception between nociceptive representation and magnitude estimation. J Neurophysiol 101: 875– 887 19073802 PMC3815214
  6. Barrett B, Muller D, Rakel D, Rabago D, Marchand L, Scheder JC (2006) Placebo, meaning, and health. Perspect Biol Med 49: 178– 198 16702703
  7. Beecher HK (1955) The powerful placebo. J Am Med Assoc 159: 1602– 1606 13271123
  8. Bernard JF, Huang GF, Besson JM (1992) Nucleus centralis of the amygdala and the globus pallidus ventralis: electrophysiological evidence for an involvement in pain processes. J Neurophysiol 68: 551– 569 1527575
  9. Bingel U, Lorenz J, Glauche V, Knab R, Glascher J, Weiller C, Buchel C (2004) Somatotopic organization of human somatosensory cortices for pain: a single trial fMRI study. NeuroImage 23: 224– 232 15325369
  10. Bingel U, Lorenz J, Schoell E, Weiller C, Buchel C (2006) Mechanisms of placebo analgesia: rACC recruitment of a subcortical antinociceptive network. Pain 120: 8– 15 16364549
  11. Bingel U, Wanigasekera V, Wiech K, Mhuircheartaigh RN, Lee MC, Ploner M, Tracey I (2011) The effect of treatment expectation on drug efficacy: imaging the analgesic benefit of the opioid remifentanil. Sci Transl Med 3: 70ra14 21325618
  12. Bornhovd K, Quante M, Glauche V, Bromm B, Weiller C, Buchel C (2002) Painful stimuli evoke different stimulus-response functions in the amygdala, prefrontal, insula and somatosensory cortex: a single-trial fMRI study. Brain 125: 1326– 1336 12023321
  13. Botvinick MM, Cohen JD, Carter CS (2004) Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: an update. Trends Cogn Sci 8: 539– 546 15556023
  14. Clark WC (1969) Sensory-decision theory analysis of the placebo effect on the criterion for pain and thermal sensitivity. J Abnorm Psychol 74: 363– 371 5805738
  15. Craggs J, Price D, Perlstein W, Nicholas Verne G, Robinson M (2008) The dynamic mechanisms of placebo induced analgesia: evidence of sustained and transient regional involvement. Pain 139: 660– 669 18804916 PMC2723185
  16. Craig ADB, Chen K, Bandy D, Reiman EM (2000) Thermosensory activation of insular cortex. Nat Neurosci 3: 184– 190 10649575
  17. de Craen AJ, Tijssen JG, de Gans J, Kleijnen J (2000) Placebo effect in the acute treatment of migraine: subcutaneous placebos are better than oral placebos. J Neurol 247: 183– 188 10787112
  18. De Pascalis V, Chiaradia C, Carotenuto E (2002) The contribution of suggestibility and expectation to placebo analgesia phenomenon in an experimental setting. Pain 96: 393– 402 11973014
  19. Dosenbach NUF, Visscher KM, Palmer ED, Miezin FM, Wenger KK, Kang HC, Burgund ED, Grimes AL, Schlaggar BL, Petersen SE (2006) A core system for the implementation of task sets. Neuron 50: 799– 812 16731517 PMC3621133
  20. Duerden EG, Albanese M-C (2011) Localization of pain-related brain activation: a meta-analysis of neuroimaging data. Hum Brain Mapp 34: 109– 149 22131304 PMC6869965
  21. Dum RP, Levinthal DJ, Strick PL (2009) The spinothalamic system targets motor and sensory areas in the cerebral cortex of monkeys. J Neurosci 29: 14223– 14235 19906970 PMC2796243
  22. Eickhoff SB, Laird AR, Grefkes C, Wang LE, Zilles K, Fox PT (2009) Coordinate-based activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis of neuroimaging data: a random-effects approach based on empirical estimates of spatial uncertainty. Hum Brain Mapp 30: 2907– 2926 19172646 PMC2872071
  23. Eippert F, Bingel U, Schoell ED, Yacubian J, Klinger R, Lorenz J, Buchel C (2009a) Activation of the opioidergic descending pain control system underlies placebo analgesia. Neuron 63: 533– 543 19709634
  24. Eippert F, Finsterbusch J, Bingel U, Buchel C (2009b) Direct evidence for spinal cord involvement in placebo analgesia. Science 326: 404 19833962
  25. Fields HL (2000) Pain modulation: expectation, opioid analgesia and virtual pain. Prog Brain Res 122: 245– 253 10737063
  26. Friebel U, Eickhoff S, Lotze M (2011) Coordinate-based meta-analysis of experimentally induced and chronic persistent neuropathic pain. NeuroImage 1– 11 PMC8018239 21798355
  27. Geuter S, Eippert F, Attar CH, Büchel C (2012) Cortical and subcortical responses to high and low effective placebo treatments. Neuroimage: 1– 10 PMC3578963 23201367
  28. Goffaux P, Redmond WJ, Rainville P, Marchand S (2007) Descending analgesia–when the spine echoes what the brain expects. Pain 130: 137– 143 17215080
  29. Gracely RH, Dubner R, Deeter WR, Wolskee PJ (1985) Clinicians’ expectations influence placebo analgesia. Lancet 1: 43 2856960
  30. Helmstetter FJ (1992) The amygdala is essential for the expression of conditional hypoalgesia. Behav Neurosci 106: 518– 528 1319714
  31. Jensen KB, Petrovic P, Kerr CE, Kirsch I, Raicek J, Cheetham A, Spaeth R, Cook A, Gollub RL, Kong J, Kaptchuk TJ (2013) Sharing pain and relief: neural correlates of physicians during treatment of patients. Mol Psychiatry 19: 392– 398 23358155 PMC3981541
  32. Kaptchuk TJ (2002) The placebo effect in alternative medicine: can the performance of a healing ritual have clinical significance? Ann Intern Med 136: 817– 825 12044130
  33. Kaptchuk TJ, Goldman P, Stone DA, Stason WB (2000) Do medical devices have enhanced placebo effects? J Clin Epidemiol 53: 786– 792 10942860
  34. Kirsch I (1997) Response expectancy theory and application: a decennial review. Appl Prev Psychol 6: 69– 79
  35. Knutson B, Adams CM, Fong GW, Hommer D (2001) Anticipation of increasing monetary reward selectively recruits nucleus accumbens. J Neurosci 21: RC159 11459880 PMC6763187
  36. Koban L, Ruzic L, Wager TD (2013) Brain predictors of individual differences in placebo responding In: Colloca L, Flaten MA, Meissner K(eds) Placebo and pain (89–101). Elsevier/Academic Press, Burlington, MA
  37. Kober H, Wager TD (2010) Meta-analysis of neuroimaging data. WIREs Cogn Sci 1: 293– 300 PMC3775366 24052810
  38. Kong J, Kaptachuk T, Polich G, Kirsch I, Angel M, Zyloney C, Rosen B, Gollub R (2009a) An fMRI study on the interaction and dissociation between expectation of pain relief and acupuncture treatment. NeuroImage 47: 1066– 1076 19501656 PMC2742363
  39. Kong J, Kaptachuk TJ, Polich G, Kirsch I, Vangel MG, Zyloney C, Rosen BR, Gollub RL (2009b) Expectancy and treatment interactions: a dissociation between acupuncture analgesia and expectancy evoked placebo analgesia. NeuroImage 45: 940– 949 19159691 PMC2737445
  40. Kong J, Jensen K, Loiotile R, Cheetham A, Wey H-Y, Tan Y, Rosen B, Smoller JW, Kaptchuk TJ, Gollub RL (2013) Functional connectivity of the frontoparietal network predicts cognitive modulation of pain. Pain 154: 459– 467 23352757 PMC3725961
  41. Koyama T, McHaffie JG, Laurienti P, Coghill RC (2005) The subjective experience of pain: where expectations become reality. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102: 12950– 12955 16150703 PMC1200254
  42. Kross E, Berman MG, Mischel W, Smith EE, Wager TD (2011) Social rejection shares somatosensory representations with physical pain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108: 6270– 6275 21444827 PMC3076808
  43. LaBar KS, Gatenby JC, Gore JC, LeDoux JE, Phelps EA (1998) Human amygdala activation during conditioned fear acquisition and extinction: a mixed-trial fMRI study. Neuron 20: 937– 945 9620698
  44. LeDoux JE (1995) Emotion: clues from the brain. Annu Rev Psychol 46: 209– 235 7872730
  45. Lee H-F, Hsieh J-C, Lu C-L, Yeh T-C, Tu C-H, Cheng C-M, Niddam DM, Lin H-C, Lee F-Y, Chang F-Y (2012) Enhanced affect/cognition-related brain responses during visceral placebo analgesia in irritable bowel syndrome patients. Pain 153: 1301– 1310 22541443
  46. Levine JD, Gordon NC (1984) Influence of the method of drug administration on analgesic response. Nature 312: 755– 756 6514008
  47. Levine JD, Gordon NC, Fields HL (1978) The mechanism of placebo analgesia. Lancet 2: 654– 657 80579
  48. Liberman R (1964) An experimental study of the placebo response under three different situations of pain. J Psychiatr Res 33: 233– 246 14271963
  49. Lieberman MD, Jarcho JM, Berman S, Naliboff BD, Suyenobu B, Mandelkern M, Mayer EA (2004) The neural correlates of placebo effects: a disruption account. NeuroImage 22: 447– 455 15110038
  50. Liljeholm M, O’Doherty JP (2012) Contributions of the striatum to learning, motivation, and performance: an associative account. Trends Cogn Sci 16: 467– 475 22890090 PMC3449003
  51. Lu H-C, Hsieh J-C, Lu C-L, Niddam DM, Wu Y-T, Yeh T-C, Cheng C-M, Chang F-Y, Lee S-D (2010) Neuronal correlates in the modulation of placebo analgesia in experimentally-induced esophageal pain: A 3 T-fMRI study. Pain 148: 75– 83 19962240
  52. Maihöfner C, Herzner B, Otto Handwerker H (2006) Secondary somatosensory cortex is important for the sensory-discriminative dimension of pain: a functional MRI study. Eur J Neurosci 23: 1377– 1383 16553798
  53. Matre D, Casey KL, Knardahl S (2006) Placebo-induced changes in spinal cord pain processing. J Neurosci 26: 559– 563 16407554 PMC6674401
  54. Mazzola L, Isnard J, Peyron R, Mauguiere F (2011) Stimulation of the human cortex and the experience of pain: Wilder Penfield’s observations revisited. Brain 135: 631– 640 22036962
  55. Miller EK (2000) The prefrontal cortex and cognitive control. Nat Rev Neurosci 1: 59– 65 11252769
  56. Miller EK, Cohen JD (2001) An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annu Rev Neurosci 24: 167– 202 11283309
  57. Moerman DE, Jonas WB (2002) Deconstructing the placebo effect and finding the meaning response. Ann Intern Med 136: 471– 476 11900500
  58. Montgomery GH, Kirsch I (1997) Classical conditioning and the placebo effect. Pain 72: 107– 113 9272794
  59. Murray EA, O’Doherty JP, Schoenbaum G (2007) What we know and do not know about the functions of the orbitofrontal cortex after 20 years of cross-species studies. J Neurosci 27: 8166– 8169 17670960 PMC2630163
  60. Petrovic P, Kalso E, Petersson KM, Ingvar M (2002) Placebo and opioid analgesia– imaging a shared neuronal network. Science 295: 1737– 1740 11834781
  61. Petrovic P, Kalso E, Petersson KM, Andersson J, Fransson P, Ingvar M (2010) A prefrontal non-opioid mechanism in placebo analgesia. Pain 150: 59– 65 20399560
  62. Peyron R, Laurent B, Garcia-Larrea L (2000) Functional imaging of brain responses to pain. A review and meta-analysis. Clin Neurophysiol 30: 263– 288 11126640
  63. Price DD, Milling L, Kirsch I, Duff A (1999) An analysis of factors that contribute to the magnitude of placebo analgesia in an experimental paradigm. Pain 83: 147– 156 10534585
  64. Price DD, Craggs J, Verne G, Perlstein W, Robinson ME (2007) Placebo analgesia is accompanied by large reductions in pain-related brain activity in irritable bowel syndrome patients. Pain 127: 63– 72 16963184
  65. Rainville P (2002) Brain mechanisms of pain affect and pain modulation. Curr Opin Neurobiol 12: 195– 204 12015237
  66. Rosen JB, Donley MP (2006) Animal studies of amygdala function in fear and uncertainty: relevance to human research. Biol Psychol 73: 49– 60 16500019
  67. Roy M, Shohamy D, Wager T (2012) Ventromedial prefrontal-subcortical systems and the generation of affective meaning. Trends Cogn Sci 16: 147– 156 22310704 PMC3318966
  68. Schoenbaum G, Roesch MR, Stalnaker TA, Takahashi YK (2009) A new perspective on the role of the orbitofrontal cortex in adaptive behaviour. Nat Rev Neurosci 10: 885– 892 19904278 PMC2835299
  69. Scott DJ, Stohler C, Egnatuk C, Wang H, Koeppe R, Zubieta JK (2008) Placebo and nocebo effects are defined by opposite opioid and dopaminergic responses. Arch Gen Psychiatry 65: 220– 231 18250260
  70. Shackman AJ, Salomons TV, Slagter HA, Fox AS, Winter JJ, Davidson RJ (2011) The integration of negative affect, pain and cognitive control in the cingulate cortex. Nat Rev Neurosci 12: 154– 167 21331082 PMC3044650
  71. Szczepanski SM, Pinsk MA, Douglas MM, Kastner S, Saalmann YB (2013) Functional and structural architecture of the human dorsal frontoparietal attention network. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110: 15806– 15811 24019489 PMC3785784
  72. Tölle TR, Kaufmann T, Siessmeier T, Lautenbacher S, Berthele A, Munz F, Zieglgänsberger W, Willoch F, Schwaiger M, Conrad B, Bartenstein P (1999) Region-specific encoding of sensory and affective components of pain in the human brain: a positron emission tomography correlation analysis. Ann Neurol 45: 40– 47 9894875
  73. Wager TD, Fields H (2013) Placebo analgesia In: McMahon S, Koltzenburg M, Tracey I, and Turk DC (eds) Wall and Melzack’s Textbook of pain, pp 362– 373. Philadelphia: Elsevier/ Saunders
  74. Wager TD, Rilling JK, Smith EE, Sokolik A, Casey KL, Davidson RJ, Kosslyn SM, Rose RM, Cohen JD (2004) Placebo-induced changes in FMRI in the anticipation and experience of pain. Science 303: 1162– 1167 14976306
  75. Wager T, Lindquist M, Kaplan L (2007a) Meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging data: current and future directions. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 2: 150– 158 18985131 PMC2555451
  76. Watson A, El-Deredy W, Iannetti G, Lloyd D, Tracey I, Vogt B, Nadeau V, Jones A (2009) Placebo conditioning and placebo analgesia modulate a common brain network during pain anticipation and perception. Pain 145: 24– 30 19523766 PMC2743811
  77. Whalen PJ, Rauch SL, Etcoff NL, McInerney SC, Lee MB, Jenike MA (1998) Masked presentations of emotional facial expressions modulate amygdala activity without explicit knowledge. J Neurosci 18: 411– 418 9412517 PMC6793390
  78. Whalen PJ, Kagan J, Cook RG, Davis FC, Kim H, Polis S, McLaren DG, Somerville LH, McLean AA, Maxwell JS, Johnstone T (2004) Human amygdala responsivity to masked fearful eye whites. Science 306: 2061 15604401
  79. Wiech K, C-s L, Brodersen KH, Bingel U, Ploner M, Tracey I(2010) Anterior insula integrates information about salience into perceptual decisions about pain. J Neurosci 30: 16324– 16331 21123578 PMC6634837
  80. Willis WD, Westlund KN (1997) Neuroanatomy of the pain system and of the pathways that modulate pain. J Clin Neurophysiol 14: 2– 31 9013357 PMC7859971
  81. Zhang W, Luo J (2009) The transferable placebo effect from pain to emotion: changes in behavior and EEG activity. Psychophysiology 46: 626– 634 19298627
  82. Zubieta JK, Smith YR, Bueller JA, Xu Y, Kilbourn MR, Jewett DM, Meyer CR, Koeppe RA, Stohler CS (2001) Regional μ opioid receptor regulation of sensory and affective dimensions of pain. Science 293: 311– 315 11452128

Authors
Atlas, L. Y., & Wager, T. D.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • University of Colorado Boulder (US)
Corresponding author
Atlas, Lauren Y.
Venue
Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology
Published
2014
Volume
225
Pages
37-69
ISSN
  • 0171-2004 (ISSN-L)
  • 1865-0325
OpenAlex
W19718613
Cited by
162
References
123
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 2
FWCI
1.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Handbook of experimental pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH076136)
  • National Cancer Institute (U54CA143924)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
Keywords
placebo analgesia, placebo effect, pain processing, dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, thalamus, insula, amygdala, striatum, prefrontal cortex, periaqueductal gray, rostral anterior cingulate cortex, noxious stimulation
MeSH terms
Analgesia, Brain, Humans, Pain, Placebo Effect, Neuroimaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review