CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 117Phonetics and Phonology ResearchEFL/ESL Teaching and LearningLinguistic Studies and Language Acquisition

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Beyond Segments: Towards a L2 Intonation Learning Theory

Mennen, Ineke·2015·Prosody, Phonology and Phonetics
DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-45168-7_9
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-662-45168-7_9

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 74

  1. Adams, C., and R. Munro. 1978. In search of the acoustic correlates of stress: Fundamental frequency, amplitude, and duration in the connected utterances of some native and nonnative speakers of English. Phonetica 35:125–156. · DOI
  2. Anderson-Hsieh, J., R. Johnson, and K. Koehler. 1992. The relationship between native speaker judgments of nonnative pronunciation and deviance in segmentals, prosody, and syllable structure. Language Learning 42:529–555. · DOI
  3. Archibald, J. 1994. A formal model of learning L2 prosodic phonology. Second Language Research 10:215–240. · DOI
  4. Arvaniti, A., and G. Garding. 2007. Dialectal variation in the rising accents of American English. In Papers in laboratory phonology 9, eds. J. Cole and J. H. Hualde, 547–576. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  5. Arvaniti, A., D. R. Ladd, and I. Mennen. 2006. Tonal association and tonal alignment: Evidence from Greek polar questions and contrastive statements. Language and Speech 49:421–450. · DOI
  6. Atterer, M., and D. R. Ladd. 2004. On the phonetics and phonology of ‘segmental anchoring’ of F0: Evidence from German. Journal of Phonetics 32:177–197. · DOI
  7. Backman, N. E. 1979. Intonation errors in second language pronunciation of eight Spanish speaking adults learning English. Interlanguage Studies Bulletin 4 (2): 239–266.
  8. Best, C. T. 1995. A direct realist view of cross-langauge speech perception. In Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research, ed. W. Strange, 171–232. Timonium: York Press.
  9. Best, C. T., and M. Tyler 2007. Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. In Language experience in second language speech learning: In Honor of James Emil Flege, eds. O. S. Bohn and M. J. Munro, 13–34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. · DOI
  10. Bohn, O.-S. 2002. On phonetic similarity. In An integrated view of language development: Papers in honor of Henning Wode, eds. P. Burmeister, T. Piske, and A. Rohde, 191–216. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher.
  11. Bongaerts, T., C. Van Summeren, B. Planken, and E. Schils. 1997. Age and ultimate attainment in the pronunciation of a foreign language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 19:447–465. · DOI
  12. Chen, S., and J. Fon. 2008. The peak alignment of prenuclear and nuclear accents among advanced L2 English learners. In Proceedings of the Speech Prosody 2008 Conference, eds. P. A. Barbosa, S. Madureira, and C. Reis, 643–646. Campinas: State University of Campinas. · DOI
  13. Cruttenden, A. 1986. Intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. · DOI · Paper page
  14. Dalton, M., and A. Ní Chasaide. 2005. Tonal alignment in Irish dialects. Language and Speech 48:257–288. · DOI
  15. De Leeuw, E., I. Mennen, and J. M. Scobbie. 2012. Singing a different tune in your native language: First language attrition of prosody. International Journal of Bilingualism 16:101–116. · DOI
  16. Flege, J. E. 1987. The production of ‘new’ and ‘similar’ phones in a foreign language: Evidence for the effect of equivalence classification. Journal of Phonetics 15:47–65. · DOI · Paper page
  17. Flege, J. E. 1992. Speech learning in a second language. In Phonological development: Models, research, and implications, eds. C. Ferguson, L. Menn, and C. Stoel-Gammon, 565–604. Timonium: York Press.
  18. Flege, J. E. 1995. Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research, ed. W. Strange, 233–277. Timonium: York Press.
  19. Flege, J. 2003. Assessing constraints on second-language segmental production and perception. In Phonetics and phonology in language comprehension and production, differences and similarities, eds. A. Meyer and N. Schiller, 319–355. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. · DOI
  20. Flege, J. E., and J. Hillenbrand. 1984. Limits on phonetic accuracy in foreign language speech production. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 76:708–721. · DOI
  21. Flege, J. E., and W. Eefting. 1987. Cross-language switching in stop consonant perception and production by Dutch speakers of English. Speech Communication 6:185–202. · DOI
  22. Flege, J., and I. MacKay. 2011. What accounts for ‘age’ effects on overall degree of foreign accent? In Achievements and perspectives in the acquisition of second language speech: New Sounds 2010, Vol. 2, eds. M. Wrembel, M. Kul, and K. Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, 65–82. Bern: Peter Lang.
  23. Flege, J. E., M. J. Munro, and I. R. A. MacKay. 1995. Factors affecting degree of perceived foreign accent in a second language. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 97:3125–3134. · DOI
  24. Frota, S. 2000. Prosody and focus in European Portuguese: Phonological phrasing and intonation. New York: Garland.
  25. Gili Fivela, B. 2012. Testing the perception of L2 intonation. In Methodological perspectives on second language prosody. Papers from ML2P 2012, eds. Maria Grazia Busà and Antonio Stella, 17–30. Padova: CLEUP.
  26. Grabe, E. 2004. Intonational variation in urban dialects of English spoken in the British Isles. In Regional variation in intonation, eds. P. Gilles and J. Peters, 9–31. Tuebingen: Niemeyer.
  27. Grosser, W. 1997. On the acquisition of tonal and accentual features of English by Austrian learners. In Second language speech: Structure and process, eds. A. James and J. Leather, 211–228. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. · DOI
  28. Gussenhoven, C. 2006. Experimental approaches to establishing discreteness of intonational contrasts. In Methods in empirical prosody research, eds. S. Sudhoff, D. Lenertová, R. Meyer, S. Pappert, P. Augurzky, I. Mleinek, N. Richter, and J. Schließer, 321–334. Berlin: De Gruyter.
  29. Gut, U. 2009. Non-native speech: A corpus-based analysis of phonological and phonetic properties of L2 English and German. Frankfurt: Peter Lang. · DOI
  30. Hewings, M. 1995. The English intonation of native speakers and Indonesian learners: A comparative study. Regional English Language Centre Journal 26:27–46.
  31. Huang, B. H. and S-A. Jun. 2011. The effect of age on the acquisition of second language prosody. Language and Speech 54:387–414. · DOI
  32. Jenner, B. 1976. Interlanguage and foreign accent. Interlanguage Studies Bulletin 1:166–195.
  33. Jilka, M. 2000b. In proceedings of new sounds 2000 4th international symposium on the acquisition of second language speech, eds. A. James and J. Leather, 199–207. Amsterdam: University of Klagenfurt.
  34. Juffs, A. 1990. Tone, syllable structure and interlanguage phonology: Chinese learners’ stress errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 21:99–115.
  35. Jun, S-A., ed. 2005. Prosodic typology: The phonology of intonation and phrasing. Oxford: Oxford University Press. · DOI
  36. Jun, S-A., and M. Oh. 2000. Acquisition of second language intonation. In Proceedings of international conference on spoken language pocessing, vol. 4, 76–79. Beijing: University of Beijing. · DOI
  37. Ladd, D. R. 1996. Intonational phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  38. Ladd, D. R., A. Schepman, L. White, L. M. Quarmby, and R. Stackhouse. 2009. Structural and dialectal effects on pitch peak alignment in two varieties of British English. Journal of Phonetics 37:145–161. · DOI
  39. Li, A., and B. Post. 2014. L2 acquisition of prosodic properties of speech rhythm: Evidence from L1 Mandarin and German learners of English, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 36:223–255. · DOI
  40. Liang, J., and V. van Heuven. 2007. Chinese tone and intonation perceived by L1 and L2 listeners. In Tones and tunes, experimental studies in word and sentence prosody, eds. C. Gussenhoven and T. Riad, 27–61. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. · DOI
  41. Mackey, W. F. 2000. The description of bilingualism. In The bilingualism reader, ed. Li Wei, 26–54. Oxford: Routledge.
  42. Magen, H. 1998. The perception of foreign-accented speech. Journal of Phonetics 26:381–400. · DOI
  43. Major, R. C. 1992. Losing english as a first language. The Modern Language Journal 76:190–208. · DOI
  44. Mennen, I. 2004. Bi-directional interference in the intonation of Dutch speakers of Greek. Journal of Phonetics 32:543–563. · DOI
  45. Mennen, I. 2007. Phonological and phonetic influences in non-native intonation. In Nonnative prosody: Phonetic descriptions and teaching practice Nicht-muttersprachliche Prosodie: Phonetische Beschreibungen und didaktische Praxis, eds. J. Trouvain and U. Gut, 53–76. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.
  46. Mennen, I., A. Chen, and F. Karlsson. 2010. Characterising the internal structure of learner intonation and its development over time. In Proceedings of new sounds 2010 6th international symposium on the acquisition of second language speech, eds. K. Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, M. Wrembel, and M. Kul, 319–324. Poznan: Adam Mickiewicz University.
  47. Mennen, I., F. Schaeffler, and G. Docherty. 2012. Cross-language difference in f0 range: a comparative study of English and German. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 131: 2249–2260. · DOI
  48. Mennen, I., F. Schaeffler, and C. Dickie. 2014. Second language acquisition of pitch range in German learners of English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 36:303–329. · DOI
  49. Munro, M. J. 1995. Nonsegmental factors in foreign accent. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 17:17–34. · DOI
  50. Munro, M., and T. Derwing. 1995. Foreign accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. Language Learning 45:73–97. · DOI
  51. Nibert, H. J. 2006. The Acquisition of the phrase accent by beginning adult Learners of Spanish as a second language. In selected proceedings of the 2nd conference on laboratory approaches to Spanish phonetics and phonology, ed. M. Díaz-Campos, 131–148. Somerville: Cascadilla Proceedings Project. http://www.lingref.com, document #1331. Accessed: 16 Feb 2014.
  52. Nolan, F. 2006. Intonation. In Handbook of english linguistics, eds. B. Aarts and A. McMahon, 433–457. Oxford: Blackwell. · DOI
  53. O’Brien, M., and U. Gut. 2010. Phonological and phonetic realisation of different types of focus in L2 speech. In Achievements and perspectives in the acquisition of second language speech: New Sounds 2010, eds. K. Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, M. Wrembel, and M. Kul, 205–215. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
  54. Pierrehumbert, J., and M. E. Beckman. 1988. Japanese tone structure. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  55. Pierrehumbert, J., and J. Hirschberg. 1990. The meaning of intonational contours in the interpretation of discourse. Intentions in communication, eds. P. Cohen, J. Morgan, and M. Pollack, 271–311, Cambridge: MIT Press. · DOI
  56. Piske, T., I. R. A. MacKay, and J. E. Flege. 2001. Factors affecting degree of foreign accent in an L2: A review. Journal of Phonetics 29:191–215. · DOI
  57. Post, B., M. D’Imperio, and C. Gussenhoven. 2007. Fine phonetic detail and intonational meaning. In Proceedings of the16th international congress of phonetic sciences, eds. J. Trouvain and W. J. Barry, 191–196. Saarbruecken:Universität des Saarlandes.
  58. Ramirez Verdugo, D. 2002. Non-native interlanguage intonation systems: A study based on a computerized corpus of Spanish learners of English. ICAME Journal 26:115–132.
  59. Rasier, L., and P. Hiligsmann. 2007. Prosodic transfer from L1 to L2. Theoretical and methodogical issues. Nouveaux cahiers de linguistique française 28:41–66.
  60. Schepman, A., R. Lickley, and D. R. Ladd. 2006. Effects of vowel length and ‘right context’ on the alignment of Dutch nuclear accents. Journal of Phonetics 34:1–28. · DOI
  61. So, C. K., and C. T. Best. 2010. Cross-language perception of non-native tonal contrasts: Effects of native phonological and phonetic influences. Language and Speech 53:273–293. · DOI
  62. So, C. K., and C. T. Best. 2011. Categorizing Mandarin tones into listeners’ native prosodic categories: The role of phonetic properties. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 47:133–145. · DOI
  63. So, C. K., and C. T. Best. 2014. Phonetic influences on English and French listeners’ assimilation of Mandarin tones to native prosodic categories. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 36:195–221 · DOI
  64. Strange, W. 2007. Cross-language phonetic similarity of vowels: Theoretical and methodological issues. In Language experience in second language speech learning: In honor of James Emil Flege, eds. O-S. Bohn and M. J. Munro, 35–55. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. · DOI
  65. Strange, W., R. Akahane-Yamada, R. Kubo, S. Trent, and K. Nishi. 2001. Effects of consonantal context on perceptual assimilation of American English vowels by Japanese listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 109:1692–1704. · DOI
  66. Swerts, M., and S. Zerbian. 2010. Intonational differences between L1 and L2 English in South Africa. Phonetica 67:127–146. · DOI
  67. Trimble, John C. 2013. Perceiving intonational cues in a foreign language: Perception of sentence type in two dialects of Spanish. In Selected proceedings of the 15th hispanic linguistics symposium, eds. Chad Howe et al. 78–92. Somerville: Cascadilla Proceedings. Project. http://www.lingref.com, document #2877, Accessed: 16 Feb 2014.
  68. Trofimovich, P., and W. Baker. 2006. Learning second-language suprasegmentals: Effect of L2 experience on prosody and fluency characteristics of L2 speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 28:1–30. · DOI
  69. Ueyama, M., and S-A. Jun. 1998. Focus realization in Japanese English and Korean english intonation. Japanese-Korean Linguistics 7:629–645.
  70. Ulbrich, C. 2008. Acquisition of regional pitch patterns in L2. In Proceedings of the speech prosody 2008 conference, eds. P. A. Barbosa, S. Madureira, and C. Reis, 575–578. Campinas: State University of Campinas. · DOI
  71. Wennerstrom, A. 1994. Intonational meaning in english discourse: A study of non-native speakers. Applied Linguistics 15:399–420. · DOI
  72. Wennerstrom, A. 1998. Intonation as cohesion in academic discourse: A study of Chinese speakers of English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 20:1–25. · DOI
  73. Willems, N. 1982. English intonation from a Dutch point of view. Dordrecht: Foris. · DOI
  74. Zerbian, S. 2015, this volume. Markedness considerations in L2 prosody. In Prosody and languages in contact: L2 acquisition, attrition, languages in multilingual situations, eds. E. Delais-Roussarie, M. Avanzi, and S. Herment. New-York: Springer. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Mennen, I.
Affiliations
University of Graz (AT)
Corresponding author
Mennen, Ineke
ORCID
Mennen, Ineke
Venue
Prosody, Phonology and Phonetics
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published
2015
Pages
171-188
ISSN
  • 2197-8700 (ISSN-L)
  • 2197-8719
DOI
10.1007/978-3-662-45168-7_9
OpenAlex
W2097828750
Cited by
117
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2
FWCI
22.29
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
Prosody, phonology and phonetics (publishedVersion)
Funders
Arts and Humanities Research Council (AH/J000302/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Linguistic Studies and Language Acquisition
Keywords
semantic dimensions, second language prosody

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review