Cited by 1,148Phonetics and Phonology ResearchEFL/ESL Teaching and LearningLinguistic Variation and Morphology

The production of “new” and “similar” phones in a foreign language: evidence for the effect of equivalence classification

Open access
Flege, James Emil·1987·Journal of Phonetics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0095-4470(19)30537-6

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Flege, J. E.
Affiliations
University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
Corresponding author
Flege, James Emil
Venue
Journal of Phonetics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1987-01
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
47-65
ISSN
0095-4470 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2289074721
Cited by
1,148
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 41 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 96 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 72 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 50 · 2016: 66 · 2015: 72 · 2014: 56 · 2013: 45 · 2012: 53
FWCI
7.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Phonetics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Linguistic Variation and Morphology
Keywords
second language speech production, phonetic norms, voice onset time, vowel formants, French-English bilingualism, phonetic similarity, language transfer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review