Function nodes in chinese syntactic networks
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In Chinese, function words, such as prepositions, conjunctions, and auxiliary and modal particles, are the most connected word types that do not form syntactic dependency among themselves and only act as intermediate words in a syntactic network.
“In Chinese, function words, such as prepositions, conjunctions, and auxiliary and modal particles, are the most connected word types that do not form syntactic dependency among themselves and only act as intermediate words in a syntactic network (Chen and Liu, 2016).”
From Syntactic Networks of Interlanguage Across L2 Modalities and Proficiency Levels (2021) · cites this paper as Chen and Liu, 2016
The number of zai ("in") in writing production of CSL learners is higher than that in oral production.
“Chen and Liu (2016) found that the number of de (“of”) and zai (“in”) in writing production of CSL learners is higher than that in oral production.”
From Syntactic Networks of Interlanguage Across L2 Modalities and Proficiency Levels (2021) · cites this paper as Chen and Liu, 2016
The number of de ("of") in writing production of CSL learners is higher than that in oral production.
“Chen and Liu (2016) found that the number of de (“of”) and zai (“in”) in writing production of CSL learners is higher than that in oral production.”
From Syntactic Networks of Interlanguage Across L2 Modalities and Proficiency Levels (2021) · cites this paper as Chen and Liu, 2016
In native Chinese speakers' production, degrees of de are higher than those of zai.
“In addition, degrees of de are higher than those of zai, which is also found in native the production of Chinese speakers (Chen and Liu, 2016).”
From Syntactic Networks of Interlanguage Across L2 Modalities and Proficiency Levels (2021) · cites this paper as Chen and Liu, 2016
In CSL learners' production, degrees of de are higher than those of zai.
“In addition, degrees of de are higher than those of zai, which is also found in native the production of Chinese speakers (Chen and Liu, 2016).”
From Syntactic Networks of Interlanguage Across L2 Modalities and Proficiency Levels (2021) · cites this paper as Chen and Liu, 2016
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Syntactic Networks of Interlanguage Across L2 Modalities and Proficiency Levels
Hao, Y., Wang, X., Wu, M., & Liu, H. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.643120 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“In Chinese, function words, such as prepositions, conjunctions, and auxiliary and modal particles, are the most connected word types that do not form syntactic dependency among themselves and only act as intermediate words in a syntactic network (Chen and Liu, 2016).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citation
- Authors
- Chen, X., & Liu, H.
- Affiliations
- Xi'an Jiaotong University (CN)
- Zhejiang University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Chen, Xinying
- Venue
- Understanding Complex Systems
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2016
- Pages
- 187-201
- ISSN
- 1860-0832 (ISSN-L)
- 1860-0840
- OpenAlex
- W1412598712
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 2.65
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Understanding complex systems (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Keywords
- function words, Chinese syntax, complex networks, network centrality, node degree, betweenness centrality, closeness centrality, Chinese Treebank, word frequency, network density, register variation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
