Cited by 57Ergonomics and Human FactorsUsability and User Interface DesignErgonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders

Advances in Ergonomic Design of Systems, Products and Processes

Barbara Deml, Patricia Stock, Ralph Bruder, Christopher Marc Schlick·2016·Springer eBooks

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-662-48661-0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Deml, B., Stock, P., Bruder, R., & Schlick, C. M.
Affiliations
  • Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE)
  • Technische Universität Darmstadt (DE)
  • RWTH Aachen University (DE)
Venue
Springer eBooks
Published
2016
OpenAlex
W2475584958
Cited by
57
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2
FWCI
3.33
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • International Linear Collider (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)) (submittedVersion)
  • mediaTUM – the media and publications repository of the Technical University Munich (Technical University Munich) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Ergonomics and Human Factors
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
Keywords
ergonomic design, human factors, product design, process design, system design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review