The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Viper: A Verification Infrastructure for Permission-Based Reasoning
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
de Moura, L., & Bjørner, N. (2008) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-78800-3_24 · Cited by 6,595
Separation logic: a logic for shared mutable data structures
Reynolds, J. C. (2003) · Proceedings 17th Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science · doi:10.1109/lics.2002.1029817 · Cited by 2,156
Proof of correctness of data representations
Hoare, C. A. R. (1972) · Acta Informatica · doi:10.1007/bf00289507 · Cited by 966
Dafny: An Automatic Program Verifier for Functional Correctness
Leino, K. R. M. (2010) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-17511-4_20 · Cited by 940
Local Reasoning about Programs that Alter Data Structures
O’Hearn, P., Reynolds, J., & Yang, H. (2001) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-44802-0_1 · Cited by 705
Why3 — Where Programs Meet Provers
Filliâtre, J.-C., & Paskevich, A. (2013) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-37036-6_8 · Cited by 538
JML: A Notation for Detailed Design
Leavens, G. T., Baker, A. L., & Ruby, C. (1999) · Behavioral Specifications of Businesses and Systems · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-5229-1_12 · Cited by 417
Frama-C: A software analysis perspective
Kirchner, F., Kosmatov, N., Prevosto, V., Signoles, J., & Yakobowski, B. (2015) · Formal Aspects of Computing · doi:10.1007/s00165-014-0326-7 · Cited by 416
Checking interference with fractional permissions
Boyland, J. (2003) · Cited by 382
VeriFast: A Powerful, Sound, Predictable, Fast Verifier for C and Java
Jacobs, B., Smans, J., Philippaerts, P., Vogels, F., Penninckx, W., & Piessens, F. (2011) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-20398-5_4 · Cited by 362
Cited by
Nagini: A Static Verifier for Python
Eilers, M., & Müller, P. (2018) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-96145-3_33 · Cited by 51
Self-citationEilers, M., Schwerhoff, M., Summers, A. J., & Müller, P. (2025) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-98668-0_5 · Cited by 2
Self-citationEvaluating the Ability of GPT-4o to Generate Verifiable Specifications in VeriFast
Rego, M., Fan, W., Hu, X., Dod, S., Ni, Z., Xie, D., DiVincenzo, J., & Tan, L. (2025) · 2025 IEEE/ACM Second International Conference on AI Foundation Models and Software Engineering (Forge) · doi:10.1109/forge66646.2025.00035 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Müller, P., Schwerhoff, M., & Summers, A. J.
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2015-12-25
- Pages
- 41-62
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- 1611-3349
- OpenAlex
- W2294722445
- Cited by
- 265
- References
- 32
- FWCI
- 8.33
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Viper: A Verification Infrastructure for Permission-Based Reasoning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-3-662-49122-5_2
- The paper
- Müller, P., Schwerhoff, M., & Summers, A. J. (2016). Viper: A Verification Infrastructure for Permission-Based Reasoning. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-49122-5_2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
