Security keys: Practical cryptographic second factors for the modern web
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Yubico Security Key has already been the subject of studies in the past.
“we focused on the Yubico Security Key as the authentication device because it is the most popular end-user security key on the market and has already been the subject of studies in the past [40], [26], [25].”
From Is FIDO2 the Kingslayer of User Authentication? A Comparative Usability Study of FIDO2 Passwordless Authentication (2020) · cites this paper as [25]
The study focused on the Yubico Security Key as the authentication device.
“we focused on the Yubico Security Key as the authentication device because it is the most popular end-user security key on the market and has already been the subject of studies in the past [40], [26], [25].”
From Is FIDO2 the Kingslayer of User Authentication? A Comparative Usability Study of FIDO2 Passwordless Authentication (2020) · cites this paper as [25]
Assuming proper implementation, FIDO2 should have Infrequent-Errors.
“Assuming proper implementation, FIDO2 should have InfrequentErrors ( ) [25], however, this error rate depends on the authenticator.”
From Is FIDO2 the Kingslayer of User Authentication? A Comparative Usability Study of FIDO2 Passwordless Authentication (2020) · cites this paper as [25]
Prior works have already shown that in general security keys are more efficient than text-based passwords.
“However, prior works have already shown that in general security keys are more efficient [25], [43] than text-based passwords.”
From Is FIDO2 the Kingslayer of User Authentication? A Comparative Usability Study of FIDO2 Passwordless Authentication (2020) · cites this paper as [25]
Cites
(2008) · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-71041-9 · Cited by 1,406 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ghorbani Lyastani, S., Schilling, M., Neumayr, M., Backes, M., & Bugiel, S. (2020) · 2020 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP) · doi:10.1109/sp40000.2020.00047 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
A Tale of Two Studies: The Best and Worst of YubiKey Usability
Reynolds, J., Smith, T., Reese, K., Dickinson, L., Ruoti, S., & Seamons, K. (2018) · 2018 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP) · doi:10.1109/sp.2018.00067 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lang, J., Czeskis, A., Balfanz, D., Schilder, M., & Srinivas, S.
- Affiliations
- Google (United States) (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lang, Juan
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2017
- Pages
- 422-440
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- 1611-3349
- OpenAlex
- W2503510896
- Cited by
- 54
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 5.67
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › User Authentication and Security Systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Advanced Authentication Protocols Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Security and Verification in Computing
- Keywords
- security keys, second-factor authentication, FIDO, phishing protection, man-in-the-middle attacks, user privacy, Google Chrome, online service security, user satisfaction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
