False Discovery Rate
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Significant proteins in the larger discovery (female) dataset at FDR < 0.05 were selected from the replication (male) dataset to estimate π1 statistics.
“Significant proteins in the larger discovery (female) dataset at FDR < 0.05 were selected from the replication (male) dataset to estimate the π1 statistics using the qvalue package (version 2.36.0). 48”
From Unraveling sex differences in Alzheimer's disease and related endophenotypes with brain proteomes (2025) · cites this paper as [48]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Unraveling sex differences in Alzheimer's disease and related endophenotypes with brain proteomes
Mei, Z., Liu, J., Bennett, D. A., Seyfried, N., Wingo, A. P., & Wingo, T. S. (2025) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1002/alz.70206 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
- Authors
- Storey, J. D.
- Affiliations
- Princeton University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Storey, John D.
- ORCID
- Storey, John D.
- Venue
- International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2025
- Pages
- 944-949
- OpenAlex
- W1962532029
- Cited by
- 152
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
- Type
- reference entry
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science (publishedVersion)
- International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Inference
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Probability and Statistical Research
- Keywords
- false discovery rate, multiple comparisons, family-wise error rate, statistical significance, false positives
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review