Unraveling sex differences in Alzheimer's disease and related endophenotypes with brain proteomes
Open accessAbstract
INTRODUCTION: Sex differences exist in Alzheimer's disease (AD), but the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. METHODS: We examined brain proteomes profiled from the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex of 770 donors (66.2% female). RESULTS: Proteome‐wide differential expression analysis in males and females jointly identified many significant proteins for AD dementia ( n = 1228), amyloid beta ( n = 1183), tangles ( n = 1309), and global cognitive trajectory ( n = 2325) at a false discovery rate of <0.05. Sex‐stratified analyses also identified many proteins associated with AD or its endophenotypes. Finally, we found 10 proteins with significant sex‐by‐trait interactions, including one in AD clinical diagnosis (MARCKS), seven in cognitive trajectories (TOGARAM1, PLCD3, SLC22A5, MTFR1L, DCUN1D5, S100A12, and TRIM46), and two in cerebral pathologies (PANK4 and SOS1). DISCUSSION: The 10 proteins with sex interaction in AD cover a range of functions likely relevant for AD pathogenesis, including estrogen response, inflammation, and mitochondrial biology, and their specific roles in AD ought to be studied. Future work should test their potential as sex‐specific AD biomarkers. Highlights: At the phenotypic level, we found sex differences in baseline cognitive performance, cognitive trajectories, and AD hallmark pathologies. Proteome‐wide differential expression analyses identified many brain proteins associated with AD and its endophenotypes in either sex alone or when considered together. We found 10 brain proteins with significant sex interactions in AD and its endophenotypes, which could be investigated as potential sex‐specific biomarkers of AD.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
In 770 ROS/MAP donors with dorsolateral prefrontal cortex proteomes, the study found many proteins associated with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and its endophenotypes, but only 10 proteins showed significant sex-by-trait interactions. The authors conclude these sex-biased proteins implicate estrogen response, inflammation, and mitochondrial biology and warrant testing as potential sex-specific AD biomarkers.
Key findings
- Phenotypic sex differences included older age at death in females (β [SE] = 2.8 [0.5]; p < 0.001), fewer years of education (β [SE] = −1.4 [0.3]; p < 0.001), better baseline episodic memory (β [SE] = 0.17 [0.06]; p = 0.002) and perceptual speed (β [SE] = 0.14 [0.06]; p = 0.024), worse baseline visuospatial ability in females (β [SE] = 0.35 [0.06]; p < 0.001), steeper cognitive decline, higher global AD pathology score (β [SE] = 0.11 [0.03]; p < 0.001), higher neurofibrillary tangle score (β [SE] = 0.38 [0.09]; p < 0.001), and more severe arteriolosclerosis (β [SE] = 0.15 [0.07]; p = 0.043).
- Among 10,030 quality-controlled proteins, 1467 showed sex-differentiated expression at FDR < 5%; 41% had higher expression in males and 59% in females.
- Joint proteome-wide differential expression identified 1228 proteins for AD dementia, 1183 for amyloid beta, 1309 for tangles, and 2325 for global cognitive trajectory at FDR < 0.05. Sex-stratified analyses found, for example, 869 female and 68 male proteins for AD versus control, with 35 significant in both; and 1579 female and 538 male proteins for global cognitive trajectory, with 393 significant in both.
- Ten proteins had significant sex-by-trait interactions: MARCKS for AD clinical diagnosis; TOGARAM1, PLCD3, and SLC22A5 for episodic memory trajectory; DCUN1D5, S100A12, and TRIM46 for semantic memory trajectory; MTFR1L for working memory trajectory; PANK4 for global AD pathology; and SOS1 for cerebral amyloid angiopathy. These remained significant after sensitivity adjustment for diabetes and hypertension.
Methods
- Participants were from the Religious Orders Study (ROS) and Rush Memory and Aging Project (MAP): 770 donors (66.2% female), all of European ancestry, mean age at death 89.4 years, with deep brain proteomes from the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.
- Proteins were quantified by isobaric tandem mass tag (TMT) labeling, high pH fractionation, liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry, and search against the human UniProt database; after quality control, 10,030 proteins were analyzed.
- Analyses used linear regression for protein–trait associations, surrogate variable analysis (SVA) for hidden factors, joint and sex-stratified models, sex-by-trait interaction tests, functional enrichment with clusterProfiler, and replication rate (π1) estimates between sex-stratified analyses.
Limitations
- The paper states the study is cross-sectional, so causal relationships between proteins and AD cannot be inferred.
- The paper states that few proteins showed significant sex-by-trait interactions, possibly reflecting limited statistical power; meta-analysis across cohorts may be needed.
- The paper states the study focused on DLPFC tissue and was based on self-identified white participants, limiting generalizability; the text also makes evident that all participants were of European ancestry and the sample was older, which further constrains generalization to other populations and brain regions.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
79 of 93 cited sources checked · 49 supported · 1 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Estrogen receptor expression has stronger associations with AD cognitive and pathologic traits in females than males.
“Expression of the estrogen receptor had stronger associations with AD cognitive and pathologic traits in females than males.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [16] Oveisgharan S, Yang J, Yu L, et al. Estrogen receptor genes, cognitive decline, and Alzheimer disease. Neurology. 2023; 100(14): e1474‐ e1487. 36697247 PMC10104608 source
- Premisecitation
NRN1 is associated with a slower rate of cognitive decline independent of AD and related dementia pathologies.
“consistent with prior studies indicating its association with a slower rate of cognitive decline independent of AD and related dementia pathologies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [49] Yu L, Tasaki S, Schneider JA, et al. Cortical Proteins associated with cognitive resilience in community‐dwelling older persons. JAMA Psychiatry. 2020; 77(11): 1172‐ 1180. 32609320 PMC7330835 source
- cites [50] Zammit AR, Klein H‐U, Yu L, et al. Proteome‐wide analyses identified cortical proteins associated with resilience for varied cognitive abilities. Neurology. 2024; 102(1): e207816. 38165375 PMC10834136 source
- Premisecitation
Transcriptome-wide sex differences in AD have been characterized in multiple studies.
“While transcriptome‐wide sex differences in AD have been characterized in multiple studies, 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 proteome‐wide sex differences in AD remain underexplored.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites [15] Sun LL, Yang SL, Sun H, Li WD, Duan SR. Molecular differences in Alzheimer's disease between male and female patients determined by integrative network analysis. J Cell Mol Med. 2019; 23(1): 47‐ 58. 30394676 PMC6307813 source
- cites [16] Oveisgharan S, Yang J, Yu L, et al. Estrogen receptor genes, cognitive decline, and Alzheimer disease. Neurology. 2023; 100(14): e1474‐ e1487. 36697247 PMC10104608 source
The RNA Expression Processing section describes transcriptome-scale sequencing, and the Discussion reports different associations between estrogen-receptor molecular variants and AD traits in women and men. But the analyses focus on selected estrogen-receptor genes and their pathways; this paper does not characterize transcriptome-wide sex differences in AD. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [17] Paranjpe MD, Belonwu S, Wang JK, et al. Sex‐specific cross tissue meta‐analysis identifies immune dysregulation in women with Alzheimer's disease. Front Aging Neurosci. 2021; 13: 735611. 34658838 PMC8515049 source
- Premisecitation
The phosphorylation level of MARCKS is associated with Aβ biogenesis and neuron degeneration.
“MARCKS is the main substrate for PKC, and the phosphorylation level of MARCKS is associated with Aβ biogenesis and neuron degeneration. 53 , 54 , 73”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites [53] Chen Z, Zhang W, Selmi C, et al. The myristoylated alanine‐rich C‐kinase Substrates (MARCKS): a membrane‐anchored mediator of the cell function. Autoimmun Rev. 2021; 20(11): 102942. 34509657 PMC9746065 source
The ‘MARCKS and neurological disorders’ section links MARCKS phosphorylation to early neuronal degeneration in Alzheimer’s disease. It also describes MARCKS as a modulator of amyloid-β peptide production, but does not link the level of MARCKS phosphorylation to that production. The ‘General terms of MARCKS’ section says phosphorylation precedes Aβ aggregation, which is distinct from Aβ biogenesis; page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [54] Fujita K, Motoki K, Tagawa K, et al. HMGB1, a pathogenic molecule that induces neurite degeneration via TLR4‐MARCKS, is a potential therapeutic target for Alzheimer's Disease. Sci Rep. 2016; 6: 31895. 27557632 PMC4997258 source
The Results sections on MARCKS phosphorylation report that phosphorylated MARCKS is found near Aβ aggregates and that phosphorylation-mimicking mutants reduce neurite length and spine density in mouse neurons (page numbers unavailable). The paper supports an association with neurite degeneration, but it does not establish an association between MARCKS phosphorylation and Aβ biogenesis; its Aβ findings concern accumulation and aggregation. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [73] Su R, Han Z‐Y, Fan Ji‐P, Zhang Y‐L. A possible role of myristoylated alanine‐rich c kinase substrate in endocytic pathway of Alzheimer's disease. Neurosci Bull. 2010; 26(4): 338‐ 344. 20651816 PMC5552570 source
Section 6 says PKC phosphorylation causes MARCKS to move from the membrane, and the figure in Section 8 proposes that this movement can promote endocytosis and Aβ production. The paper does not establish an association between MARCKS phosphorylation levels and neuronal degeneration; its proposed link to Aβ production is also not a measured association. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
PKC substrates make up over half of the core molecules in AD.
“Studies have shown that PKC is one of the key kinases activated in AD, and PKC substrates make up over half of the core molecules in AD. 75 , 76”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [75] Morshed N, Lee MJ, Rodriguez FH, Lauffenburger DA, Mastroeni D, White FM. Quantitative phosphoproteomics uncovers dysregulated kinase networks in Alzheimer's Disease. Nat Aging. 2021; 1(6): 550‐ 565. 37117831 source
In “AD kinase networks overlap with substrate and mouse model phosphoproteomes” (page unavailable), the paper reports that PKCA-regulated phosphosites are associated with AD-related cluster centroids. It does not say that PKC substrates constitute over half of any set of “core molecules” in AD; the proportion and category are unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.79)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [76] Tagawa K, Homma H, Saito A, et al. Comprehensive phosphoproteome analysis unravels the core signaling network that initiates the earliest synapse pathology in preclinical Alzheimer's disease brain. Hum Mol Genet. 2015; 24(2): 540‐ 558. 25231903 source
- Premisecitation
Expression of SLC22A5 is regulated by estrogen receptors.
“SLC22A5 is a carnitine transporter involved in neurotransmitter synthesis, and expression of SLC22A5 is regulated by estrogen receptors. 62”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [62] Wang C, Uray IP, Mazumdar A, Mayer JA, Brown PH. SLC22A5/OCTN2 expression in breast cancer is induced by estrogen via a novel intronic estrogen‐response element (ERE). Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012; 134(1): 101‐ 115. 22212555 PMC3416040 source
- Premisecitation
SLC22A5 is associated with estrogen-related signaling pathways.
“Both PLCD3 and SLC22A5 are associated with estrogen‐related signaling pathways (Figure S5), with PLCD3 being a phospholipase C (PLC) isozyme activated by G protein‐coupled estrogen receptor (GPER) 60 , 61 and SLC22A5 being a carnitine transport protein transcriptionally regulated by estrogen receptors. 62”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [62] Wang C, Uray IP, Mazumdar A, Mayer JA, Brown PH. SLC22A5/OCTN2 expression in breast cancer is induced by estrogen via a novel intronic estrogen‐response element (ERE). Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012; 134(1): 101‐ 115. 22212555 PMC3416040 source
- Premisecitation
MARCKS is the main substrate for PKC.
“MARCKS is the main substrate for PKC, and the phosphorylation level of MARCKS is associated with Aβ biogenesis and neuron degeneration. 53 , 54 , 73”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites [53] Chen Z, Zhang W, Selmi C, et al. The myristoylated alanine‐rich C‐kinase Substrates (MARCKS): a membrane‐anchored mediator of the cell function. Autoimmun Rev. 2021; 20(11): 102942. 34509657 PMC9746065 source
- cites [54] Fujita K, Motoki K, Tagawa K, et al. HMGB1, a pathogenic molecule that induces neurite degeneration via TLR4‐MARCKS, is a potential therapeutic target for Alzheimer's Disease. Sci Rep. 2016; 6: 31895. 27557632 PMC4997258 source
The paper’s Abstract (page unavailable) calls MARCKS a “representative substrate” of PKC, and the Results identify PKC as a MARCKS kinase. These passages support the substrate relationship but do not establish that MARCKS is PKC’s main substrate. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [73] Su R, Han Z‐Y, Fan Ji‐P, Zhang Y‐L. A possible role of myristoylated alanine‐rich c kinase substrate in endocytic pathway of Alzheimer's disease. Neurosci Bull. 2010; 26(4): 338‐ 344. 20651816 PMC5552570 source
- Premisecitation
PKC is one of the key kinases activated in AD.
“Studies have shown that PKC is one of the key kinases activated in AD, and PKC substrates make up over half of the core molecules in AD. 75 , 76”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [75] Morshed N, Lee MJ, Rodriguez FH, Lauffenburger DA, Mastroeni D, White FM. Quantitative phosphoproteomics uncovers dysregulated kinase networks in Alzheimer's Disease. Nat Aging. 2021; 1(6): 550‐ 565. 37117831 source
- cites [76] Tagawa K, Homma H, Saito A, et al. Comprehensive phosphoproteome analysis unravels the core signaling network that initiates the earliest synapse pathology in preclinical Alzheimer's disease brain. Hum Mol Genet. 2015; 24(2): 540‐ 558. 25231903 source
- Premisecitation
Post mortem studies indicate that females have lower resistance to AD pathologies.
“Moreover, post mortem studies indicate that females have lower resistance to AD pathologies. 70 , 71”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [70] Oveisgharan S, Arvanitakis Z, Yu L, Farfel J, Schneider JA, Bennett DA. Sex differences in Alzheimer's disease and common neuropathologies of aging. Acta Neuropathol. 2018; 136(6): 887‐ 900. 30334074 PMC6279593 source
- cites [71] Liesinger AM, Graff‐Radford NR, Duara R, et al. Sex and age interact to determine clinicopathologic differences in Alzheimer's Disease. Acta Neuropathol. 2018; 136(6): 873‐ 885. 30219939 PMC6280837 source
- Premisecitation
PLCD3 is associated with estrogen-related signaling pathways.
“Both PLCD3 and SLC22A5 are associated with estrogen‐related signaling pathways (Figure S5), with PLCD3 being a phospholipase C (PLC) isozyme activated by G protein‐coupled estrogen receptor (GPER) 60 , 61 and SLC22A5 being a carnitine transport protein transcriptionally regulated by estrogen receptors. 62”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [60] Roque C, Mendes‐Oliveira J, Duarte‐Chendo C, Baltazar G. The Role of G protein‐coupled estrogen receptor 1 on neurological disorders. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2019; 55: 100786. 31513775 source
- cites [61] Prossnitz ER, Barton M. The G protein‐coupled oestrogen receptor GPER in health and disease: an update. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2023; 19(7): 407‐ 424. 37193881 PMC10187525 source
The “Molecular signalling mediated by GPER” section (page unavailable) describes an oestrogen-related GPER pathway involving PLCβ–PKC. It does not identify PLCD3 or say that GPER activates that particular PLC isozyme, so it supports the pathway connection only at the broader PLC-family level. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Interpretationcitation
Our results corroborate previous studies that highlighted a sex-specific association between AD and estrogen receptors.
“Our results corroborate previous studies that highlighted a sex‐specific association between AD and estrogen receptors. 15 , 16”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [15] Sun LL, Yang SL, Sun H, Li WD, Duan SR. Molecular differences in Alzheimer's disease between male and female patients determined by integrative network analysis. J Cell Mol Med. 2019; 23(1): 47‐ 58. 30394676 PMC6307813 source
- cites [16] Oveisgharan S, Yang J, Yu L, et al. Estrogen receptor genes, cognitive decline, and Alzheimer disease. Neurology. 2023; 100(14): e1474‐ e1487. 36697247 PMC10104608 source
- Premisecitation
Limited findings from genome-wide and transcriptome-wide association studies in AD suggest that sample size is a critical consideration when examining sex interactions.
“Limited findings from genome‐wide 86 and transcriptome‐wide 18 , 22 association studies in AD also suggest that the sample size is a critical consideration when examining sex interactions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites [86] Dumitrescu L, Barnes LL, Thambisetty M, et al. Sex differences in the genetic predictors of Alzheimer's pathology. Brain. 2019; 142(9): 2581‐ 2589. 31497858 PMC6736148 source
- cites [18] Brooks LRK, Mias GI. Data‐driven analysis of age, sex, and tissue effects on gene expression variability in Alzheimer's Disease. Front Neurosci. 2019; 13: 392. 31068785 PMC6491842 source
- cites [22] Cáceres A, González JR. Female‐specific risk of Alzheimer's disease is associated with tau phosphorylation processes: a transcriptome‐wide interaction analysis. Neurobiol Aging. 2020; 96: 104‐ 108. 32977080 source
- Findingown data
We found a 60% π1 replication rate with earlier studies (n = 516 DLPFC samples) for clinical diagnosis.
“We also found a 60% π1 replication rate with earlier studies (n = 516 DLPFC samples) for clinical diagnosis, 43 suggesting the replicability of prior results.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [43] Johnson ECB, Carter EK, Dammer EB, et al. Large‐scale deep multi‐layer analysis of Alzheimer's disease brain reveals strong proteomic disease‐related changes not observed at the RNA Level. Nat Neurosci. 2022; 25(2): 213‐ 225. 35115731 PMC8825285 source
- Findingown data
68% of the significant proteins in amyloid identified here overlapped with a recent large-scale proteomics study and showed concordant directions of association.
“When compared with a recent large‐scale proteomics study across diverse racial and ethnic groups, 83 58% of the significant proteins in AD dementia and 68% of the significant proteins in amyloid identified here overlapped with their findings and showed concordant directions of association.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [83] Seifar F, Fox EJ, Shantaraman A, et al. Large‐scale deep proteomic analysis in Alzheimer's disease brain regions across race and ethnicity. Alzheimers Dement. 2024; 20(12): 8878‐ 8897. 39535480 PMC11667503 source
- Findingown data
58% of the significant proteins in AD dementia identified here overlapped with a recent large-scale proteomics study and showed concordant directions of association.
“When compared with a recent large‐scale proteomics study across diverse racial and ethnic groups, 83 58% of the significant proteins in AD dementia and 68% of the significant proteins in amyloid identified here overlapped with their findings and showed concordant directions of association.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [83] Seifar F, Fox EJ, Shantaraman A, et al. Large‐scale deep proteomic analysis in Alzheimer's disease brain regions across race and ethnicity. Alzheimers Dement. 2024; 20(12): 8878‐ 8897. 39535480 PMC11667503 source
- Premisecitation
There is important overlap between brain and CSF proteomes.
“Given the important overlap between brain and CSF proteomes, 80 , 81 , 82 further studies could investigate these proteins as potential sex‐specific biomarkers in AD.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites [80] Higginbotham L, Ping L, Dammer EB, et al. Integrated proteomics reveals brain‐based cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers in asymptomatic and symptomatic Alzheimer's disease. Sci Adv. 2020; 6(43). PMC7577712 33087358 source
- cites [81] Johnson ECB, Dammer EB, Duong DM, et al. Large‐scale proteomic analysis of Alzheimer's disease brain and cerebrospinal fluid reveals early changes in energy metabolism associated with microglia and astrocyte activation. Nat Med. 2020; 26(5): 769‐ 780. 32284590 PMC7405761 source
- cites [82] Haque R, Watson CM, Liu J, et al. A protein panel in cerebrospinal fluid for diagnostic and predictive assessment of Alzheimer's Disease. Sci Transl Med. 2023; 15(712): eadg4122. 37672565 PMC10880442 source
- Findingown data
Upregulated proteins in AD were enriched in processes related to intermediate filament, cell chemotaxis, and phospholipid transport.
“The upregulated proteins in AD were enriched in processes related to intermediate filament, cell chemotaxis, and phospholipid transport (Figure S1, Table S4).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The top differentially expressed proteins were encoded by genes on the X chromosome.
“As expected, the top differentially expressed proteins were encoded by genes on the X chromosome.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Although females had a higher Aβ load than males, the difference was not statistically significant after controlling for education and age at death.
“Although females had a higher Aβ load than males, the difference was not statistically significant after controlling for education and age at death (p = 0.113).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Upregulated proteins associated with cognitive stability were enriched for synapse organization, oxidative phosphorylation, and actin filament organization.
“The upregulated proteins associated with cognitive stability were enriched for synapse organization, oxidative phosphorylation, and actin filament organization”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Joint analysis in rates of change of global cognition revealed 2325 significant proteins at FDR < 5%.
“Joint analysis in rates of change of global cognition revealed 2325 significant proteins (at FDR < 5%, Table S5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Among the 10,030 measured proteins, 1467 showed sex-differentiated expression at an FDR cutoff of 5%.
“Among the 10,030 measured proteins, 1467 showed sex‐differentiated expression at the FDR cutoff of 5%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the joint analysis between AD and control, 1228 proteins were differentially expressed at FDR < 0.05.
“In the joint analysis between AD and control, 1228 proteins were differentially expressed with FDR < 0.05 (Table S3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Sex-stratified analyses of global AD pathology identified 1522 significant proteins in females at a FDR threshold of 5%.
“Sex‐stratified analyses of global AD pathology identified 1522 significant proteins in females and 231 in males at a FDR threshold of 5% (Figure S3, Table S14).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
NRN1 was the top protein upregulated in cognitive stability.
“NRN1 was the top protein upregulated in cognitive stability”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
TOGARAM1, PLCD3, SLC22A5, MTFR1L, DCUN1D5, S100A12, and TRIM46 showed significant sex-by-trait interactions in cognitive trajectories.
“seven in cognitive trajectories (TOGARAM1, PLCD3, SLC22A5, MTFR1L, DCUN1D5, S100A12, and TRIM46)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
MARCKS showed a significant sex-by-trait interaction in AD clinical diagnosis.
“including one in AD clinical diagnosis (MARCKS)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In sex-stratified analyses of rates of change of global cognition, 1579 proteins were differentially expressed in females and 538 in males at FDR < 0.05.
“In sex‐stratified analyses of the rates of change of global cognition, 1579 proteins were found to be differentially expressed in females and 538 proteins were differentially expressed in males with FDR < 0.05 (Figure 2B, Table S5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Higher-abundance proteins in Aβ and tangles were enriched for intermediate filament-based process, response to wounding, and extracellular matrix binding.
“The higher‐abundance proteins in Aβ and tangles were both enriched for intermediate filament‐based process, response to wounding, and extracellular matrix binding”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Downregulated proteins associated with cognitive stability were enriched for processes related to intermediate filaments and endosomal transport.
“while the downregulated proteins were enriched for processes related to intermediate filaments and endosomal transport (Figure S1, Table S6).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Male-stratified analysis identified two proteins for Lewy bodies.
“Regarding age‐related pathologies, the female‐stratified analysis identified 33 significant proteins for Lewy bodies and 46 for CAA, while the male‐stratified analysis identified two proteins for Lewy bodies, nine for CAA, and one for hippocampal sclerosis (Figure S3, Tables S17 to S23).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
TRIM46 showed a significant sex interaction with the rate of change of semantic memory.
“Specifically, TOGARAM1, PLCD3, and SLC22A5 showed a significant sex interaction with the rates of change of episodic memory; MTFR1L displayed a significant sex interaction with the rates of change of working memory; and DCUN1D5, S100A12, and TRIM46 showed a significant sex interaction with the rates of change of semantic memory.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
We found 10 proteins with significant sex-by-trait interactions in AD and its endophenotypes.
“Finally, we found 10 proteins with significant sex‐by‐trait interactions, including one in AD clinical diagnosis (MARCKS), seven in cognitive trajectories (TOGARAM1, PLCD3, SLC22A5, MTFR1L, DCUN1D5, S100A12, and TRIM46), and two in cerebral pathologies (PANK4 and SOS1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
SLC22A5 showed a significant sex interaction with the rate of change of episodic memory.
“Specifically, TOGARAM1, PLCD3, and SLC22A5 showed a significant sex interaction with the rates of change of episodic memory; MTFR1L displayed a significant sex interaction with the rates of change of working memory; and DCUN1D5, S100A12, and TRIM46 showed a significant sex interaction with the rates of change of semantic memory.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The estimated replication rate for the male group was 50%.
“The estimated replication rate for the male group was 50%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
45 proteins were significant in both female- and male-stratified analyses for tangles.
“The number of proteins significant in both sex‐stratified analyses was 152 for Aβ and 45 for tangles.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Female-stratified analysis identified 46 significant proteins for CAA.
“Regarding age‐related pathologies, the female‐stratified analysis identified 33 significant proteins for Lewy bodies and 46 for CAA, while the male‐stratified analysis identified two proteins for Lewy bodies, nine for CAA, and one for hippocampal sclerosis (Figure S3, Tables S17 to S23).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
When using the female group as the discovery dataset, the estimated replication rate (π1) for the male group was 56% for AD.
“When using the female group as the discovery dataset, the estimated replication rate (π1 statistics) for the male group was 56%, indicating that 56% of significant proteins identified in the female‐stratified analysis were replicated in the male‐stratified analysis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
MTFR1L showed a significant sex interaction with the rate of change of working memory.
“Specifically, TOGARAM1, PLCD3, and SLC22A5 showed a significant sex interaction with the rates of change of episodic memory; MTFR1L displayed a significant sex interaction with the rates of change of working memory; and DCUN1D5, S100A12, and TRIM46 showed a significant sex interaction with the rates of change of semantic memory.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In female-stratified analysis, 745 proteins were associated with Aβ.
“Female‐stratified analysis yielded 745 proteins associated with Aβ and 592 associated with tangles, while male‐stratified analyses yielded 232 significant proteins in Aβ and 80 significant proteins in tangles (Figure 2C, Figure 2D, Table S12‐S13).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
When the female group was used as the discovery dataset, the replication rate for tangles was 67%.
“When the female group was used as the discovery dataset, the replication rates for Aβ and tangles were 63% and 67%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Lower-abundance proteins in Aβ and tangles were enriched for axon development and synaptic transmission.
“while the lower‐abundance proteins in Aβ and tangles were enriched for axon development and synaptic transmission (Figure S1, Table S15‐S16).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
When using the female group as the discovery dataset, the estimated replication rate for the male group was 81% for global cognition.
“When using the female group as the discovery dataset, the estimated replication rate for the male group was 81%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Female-stratified analysis identified 33 significant proteins for Lewy bodies.
“Regarding age‐related pathologies, the female‐stratified analysis identified 33 significant proteins for Lewy bodies and 46 for CAA, while the male‐stratified analysis identified two proteins for Lewy bodies, nine for CAA, and one for hippocampal sclerosis (Figure S3, Tables S17 to S23).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
PANK4 and SOS1 showed significant sex-by-trait interactions in cerebral pathologies.
“and two in cerebral pathologies (PANK4 and SOS1)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Male-stratified analysis identified nine proteins for CAA.
“Regarding age‐related pathologies, the female‐stratified analysis identified 33 significant proteins for Lewy bodies and 46 for CAA, while the male‐stratified analysis identified two proteins for Lewy bodies, nine for CAA, and one for hippocampal sclerosis (Figure S3, Tables S17 to S23).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
When the female group was used as the discovery dataset, the replication rate for Aβ was 63%.
“When the female group was used as the discovery dataset, the replication rates for Aβ and tangles were 63% and 67%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In male-stratified analysis, 80 proteins were significantly associated with tangles.
“Female‐stratified analysis yielded 745 proteins associated with Aβ and 592 associated with tangles, while male‐stratified analyses yielded 232 significant proteins in Aβ and 80 significant proteins in tangles (Figure 2C, Figure 2D, Table S12‐S13).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
393 proteins were significant in both stratified analyses of global cognition and exhibited the same direction of associations.
“Notably, 393 proteins were significant in both stratified analyses and exhibited the same direction of associations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Sex-stratified analyses of global AD pathology identified 231 significant proteins in males at a FDR threshold of 5%.
“Sex‐stratified analyses of global AD pathology identified 1522 significant proteins in females and 231 in males at a FDR threshold of 5% (Figure S3, Table S14).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the joint and sex-stratified analysis between AD and control, 1364 proteins passed an FDR threshold of 5%.
“In the joint and sex‐stratified analysis between AD and control, a sum of 1364 proteins passed an FDR threshold of 5%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In male-stratified analysis, 232 proteins were significantly associated with Aβ.
“Female‐stratified analysis yielded 745 proteins associated with Aβ and 592 associated with tangles, while male‐stratified analyses yielded 232 significant proteins in Aβ and 80 significant proteins in tangles (Figure 2C, Figure 2D, Table S12‐S13).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
PLCD3 showed a significant sex interaction with the rate of change of episodic memory.
“Specifically, TOGARAM1, PLCD3, and SLC22A5 showed a significant sex interaction with the rates of change of episodic memory; MTFR1L displayed a significant sex interaction with the rates of change of working memory; and DCUN1D5, S100A12, and TRIM46 showed a significant sex interaction with the rates of change of semantic memory.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
TOGARAM1 showed a significant sex interaction with the rate of change of episodic memory.
“Specifically, TOGARAM1, PLCD3, and SLC22A5 showed a significant sex interaction with the rates of change of episodic memory; MTFR1L displayed a significant sex interaction with the rates of change of working memory; and DCUN1D5, S100A12, and TRIM46 showed a significant sex interaction with the rates of change of semantic memory.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In female-stratified analysis, 592 proteins were associated with tangles.
“Female‐stratified analysis yielded 745 proteins associated with Aβ and 592 associated with tangles, while male‐stratified analyses yielded 232 significant proteins in Aβ and 80 significant proteins in tangles (Figure 2C, Figure 2D, Table S12‐S13).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Seven proteins had significant sex-by-trait interactions with FDR < 0.05 for cognitive trajectories.
“Seven proteins were found to have significant sex‐by‐trait interactions with FDR < 0.05 (Table 2, Figure S4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
DCUN1D5 showed a significant sex interaction with the rate of change of semantic memory.
“Specifically, TOGARAM1, PLCD3, and SLC22A5 showed a significant sex interaction with the rates of change of episodic memory; MTFR1L displayed a significant sex interaction with the rates of change of working memory; and DCUN1D5, S100A12, and TRIM46 showed a significant sex interaction with the rates of change of semantic memory.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
S100A12 showed a significant sex interaction with the rate of change of semantic memory.
“Specifically, TOGARAM1, PLCD3, and SLC22A5 showed a significant sex interaction with the rates of change of episodic memory; MTFR1L displayed a significant sex interaction with the rates of change of working memory; and DCUN1D5, S100A12, and TRIM46 showed a significant sex interaction with the rates of change of semantic memory.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Male-stratified analysis identified one protein for hippocampal sclerosis.
“Regarding age‐related pathologies, the female‐stratified analysis identified 33 significant proteins for Lewy bodies and 46 for CAA, while the male‐stratified analysis identified two proteins for Lewy bodies, nine for CAA, and one for hippocampal sclerosis (Figure S3, Tables S17 to S23).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Among the significant proteins in the AD versus control analysis, MARCKS had a significant sex-by-trait interaction at FDR < 0.05.
“Among these significant proteins, one protein, MARCKS, had a significant sex‐by‐trait interaction at FDR < 0.05 (Table 2, Figure S4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
MDK, SMOC1, and NTN1 were the top proteins positively associated with both Aβ and tangles.
“As depicted in Figure 1C and D, MDK, SMOC1, and NTN1 were the top proteins positively associated with both Aβ and tangles.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
152 proteins were significant in both female- and male-stratified analyses for Aβ.
“The number of proteins significant in both sex‐stratified analyses was 152 for Aβ and 45 for tangles.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In sex-by-trait interaction analyses for cerebral pathologies, two proteins passed the 5% FDR threshold for global AD pathology and CAA.
“In the sex‐by‐trait interaction analyses for cerebral pathologies, two proteins passed the 5% FDR threshold for global AD pathology and CAA (Table 2, Figure S4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
All sex-biased proteins remained significant in the sex-by-trait interaction analyses after adjusting for diabetes and hypertension.
“All the sex‐biased proteins remained significant in the sex‐by‐trait interaction analyses (Table S24), further suggesting the robustness of our findings.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Females outperformed males in baseline processing speed.
“Specifically, females outperformed males in baseline episodic memory and processing speed but experienced greater declines in cognitive performance over time.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
SOS1 showed a significant sex interaction with CAA.
“SOS1 showed a significant sex interaction with CAA and is a guanine nucleotide exchange factor that activates the RAS signaling cascade. 64”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Females outperformed males in baseline episodic memory.
“Specifically, females outperformed males in baseline episodic memory and processing speed but experienced greater declines in cognitive performance over time.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
PANK4 showed a sex-biased association with global AD pathology.
“Of these two proteins, PANK4 showed a sex‐biased association with global AD pathology and is one of the pantothenate kinase isozymes implicated in coenzyme A biosynthesis. 63”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Some sex-biased proteins identified (PLCD3, MARCKS, SLC22A5) are involved in estrogen-related pathways.
“Interestingly, some sex‐biased proteins we identified are involved in estrogen‐related pathways, including PLCD3, MARCKS, and SLC22A5 (Figure S5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Females experienced greater declines in cognitive performance over time.
“Specifically, females outperformed males in baseline episodic memory and processing speed but experienced greater declines in cognitive performance over time.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
While hundreds of proteins were differentially expressed between sexes or in AD and its endophenotypes, only a small number had significant sex-by-trait interactions.
“While hundreds of proteins were differentially expressed between sexes or differentially expressed in AD and its endophenotypes, only a small number of them had significant sex‐by‐trait interactions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In CAA, some matrisome proteins (SMOC1, NTN1, MDK) were significantly upregulated.
“In CAA, some matrisome proteins (SMOC1, NTN1, MDK) were found to be significantly upregulated.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
We found differential expression in age-related pathologies such as CAA and Lewy body pathology.
“In addition to AD and AD pathology, we also found differential expression in age‐related pathologies such as CAA and Lewy body pathology.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
CHRM3 was significantly upregulated in both AD and Lewy body pathology.
“Similarly, the muscarinic cholinergic receptor CHRM3, which is involved in the acetylcholine pathway, 84 was significantly upregulated in both AD and Lewy body pathology.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
A limited number of proteins showed significant sex-by-trait interactions in our analysis.
“Second, a limited number of proteins showed significant sex‐by‐trait interactions in our analysis, which may imply a lack of statistical power.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisereasoning
Proteome-wide sex differences in AD and related endophenotypes have not been explored.
“However, proteome‐wide sex differences in AD and related endophenotypes have not been explored.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Proteome-wide differential expression analyses identified many brain proteins associated with AD and its endophenotypes in either sex alone or when considered together.
“Proteome‐wide differential expression analyses identified many brain proteins associated with AD and its endophenotypes in either sex alone or when considered together.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The 10 proteins with sex interaction in AD cover a range of functions likely relevant for AD pathogenesis, including estrogen response, inflammation, and mitochondrial biology.
“The 10 proteins with sex interaction in AD cover a range of functions likely relevant for AD pathogenesis, including estrogen response, inflammation, and mitochondrial biology, and their specific roles in AD ought to be studied.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The replication rates observed in sex-stratified analyses (mean 67%, range 50% to 84%) suggest moderate to high consistency in the differentially expressed proteins associated with AD and related endophenotypes between the sexes.
“The replication rates observed in sex‐stratified analyses (mean: 67%; range: 50% to 84%) suggest moderate to high consistency in the differentially expressed proteins associated with AD and related endophenotypes between the sexes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Joint and sex-stratified differential analyses indicate robust protein expression differences for AD and its endophenotypes.
“Collectively, the joint and sex‐stratified differential analyses indicate robust protein expression differences for AD and its endophenotypes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Different PKC activity between females and males may account for some of the sex differences in AD.
“This suggests that different PKC activity between females and males may account for some of the sex differences in AD.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Our analysis identified some promising proteins and cellular processes with sex-biased association in AD and AD endophenotypes.
“Overall, our analysis identified some promising proteins and cellular processes with sex‐biased association in AD and AD endophenotypes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Proteome-wide sex differences in AD remain underexplored.
- Interpretationreasoning
PKC is central to the molecular pathways of all these proteins.
“Notably, PKC is central to the molecular pathways of all these proteins.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Several sex-biased proteins identified in our study are also involved in molecular processes that may contribute to AD pathogenesis.
“Several sex‐biased proteins identified in our study are also involved in molecular processes that may contribute to AD pathogenesis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
PKC regulates the activity and translocation of SLC22A5.
“PKC also regulates the activity and translocation of SLC22A5. 74”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [74] Jurkiewicz D, Michalec K, Skowronek K, Nałęcz KA. Tight junction protein ZO‐1 controls organic cation/carnitine transporter OCTN2 (SLC22A5) in a protein kinase C‐dependent Way. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Res. 2017; 1864(5): 797‐ 805. 28257821 source
- Interpretationreasoning
The initial memory advantage in females appears to diminish over time with the loss of coping mechanisms in pathological aging.
“Our study and others support the notion that the initial memory advantage in females appears to diminish over time with the loss of coping mechanisms in pathological aging.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The sensitivity analysis adjusting for diabetes and hypertension suggests robustness of our findings.
“All the sex‐biased proteins remained significant in the sex‐by‐trait interaction analyses (Table S24), further suggesting the robustness of our findings.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The 60% π1 replication rate suggests replicability of prior results.
“We also found a 60% π1 replication rate with earlier studies (n = 516 DLPFC samples) for clinical diagnosis, 43 suggesting the replicability of prior results.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
A meaningful investigation of interactions may require a nearly 10-fold increase in sample size compared to that needed for detecting main effects.
“A meaningful investigation of interactions may require a nearly 10‐fold increase in sample size compared to that needed for detecting the main effects. 85”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [85] Patsopoulos NA, Tatsioni A, Ioannidis JP. Claims of sex differences: an empirical assessment in genetic associations. JAMA. 2007; 298(8): 880‐ 893. 17712072 source
- Interpretationown data
The presence of these shared proteins may suggest a close interaction between AD and co-occurring neuropathologic conditions.
“The presence of these shared proteins may suggest a close interaction between AD and co‐occurring neuropathologic conditions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Our study identified many brain proteins associated with AD, cognitive trajectories, and AD-related pathologies.
“In conclusion, our study identified many brain proteins associated with AD, cognitive trajectories, and AD‐related pathologies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Proteome-wide sex differences in AD remain underexplored.
- Interpretationown data
Our analysis identified robust protein expression differences in AD and AD hallmark pathology.
“Consistent with previous proteomic studies of AD brain tissue, our analysis identified robust protein expression differences in AD and AD hallmark pathology.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
We identified sex-biased proteins associated with AD and its endophenotypes in the brain that could be investigated as potential biomarkers for sex-specific risk.
“We identified sex‐biased proteins associated with AD and its endophenotypes in the brain that could be investigated as potential biomarkers for sex‐specific risk.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Proteome-wide sex differences in AD remain underexplored.
- Interpretationreasoning
Causal relationship cannot be inferred between these proteins and AD.
“First, this is a cross‐sectional study; therefore, causal relationship cannot be inferred between these proteins and AD.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
Our analysis was based on self-identified white participants.
“Lastly, our analysis was based on self‐identified white participants owing to low statistical power in other groups, which may limit the generalizability of our findings.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The use of self-identified white participants may limit the generalizability of our findings.
“Lastly, our analysis was based on self‐identified white participants owing to low statistical power in other groups, which may limit the generalizability of our findings.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
These results suggest that the effect size of sex-based interactions is likely small.
“These results suggest that the effect size of sex‐based interactions is likely small.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductnone given
This is a cross-sectional study.
“First, this is a cross‐sectional study; therefore, causal relationship cannot be inferred between these proteins and AD.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 44
- May combine two claims. 36
- Not yet classified. 1
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAn integrated proteomic and metabolomic study of 43 hippocampal samples identified significant sex differences in insulin signaling and serine metabolism.
“An integrated proteomic and metabolomic study of 43 hippocampal samples identified significant sex differences in insulin signaling and serine metabolism.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [23] Mangold CA, Wronowski B, Du M, et al. Sexually divergent induction of microglial‐associated neuroinflammation with hippocampal aging. J Neuroinflammation. 2017; 14(1): 141. 28732515 PMC5521082 source
The Methods (Microarray analysis; page unavailable) describe transcriptomic microarray analysis of 24 mouse hippocampal samples, not an integrated proteomic and metabolomic study of 43 samples. The Results (Sex differences in hippocampal gene expression across the lifespan; page unavailable) report sex differences chiefly in inflammatory and microglial gene expression, not the claimed insulin-signaling and serine-metabolism findings. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPrior work examined the effect of biological sex on protein expression and its genetic regulation in human brain proteomes.
“Our prior work examined the effect of biological sex on protein expression and its genetic regulation in human brain proteomes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [24] Wingo AP, Liu Y, Gerasimov ES, et al. Sex differences in brain protein expression and disease. Nat Med. 2023; 29(9): 2224‐ 2232. 37653343 PMC10504083 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSex differences have been observed in the progression, diagnosis, and clinical presentations of AD.
“Despite the mixed findings from these incidence studies, sex differences have been observed in the progression, diagnosis, and clinical presentations of AD.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites [12] Mielke MM, Vemuri P, Rocca WA. Clinical epidemiology of Alzheimer's disease: assessing sex and gender differences. Clin Epidemiol. 2014; 6: 37‐ 48. 24470773 PMC3891487 source
- cites [13] Nebel RA, Aggarwal NT, Barnes LL, et al. Understanding the impact of sex and gender in Alzheimer's disease: a call to action. Alzheimers Dement. 2018; 14(9): 1171‐ 1183. 29907423 PMC6400070 source
- cites [14] Ferretti MT, Iulita MF, Cavedo E, et al. Sex differences in Alzheimer disease—the gateway to precision medicine. Nat Rev Neurol. 2018; 14(8): 457‐ 469. 29985474 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationEstrogen-related receptor beta is differentially expressed between male and female AD across four brain regions.
“For instance, estrogen‐related receptor beta was found to be differentially expressed between male and female AD across four brain regions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [15] Sun LL, Yang SL, Sun H, Li WD, Duan SR. Molecular differences in Alzheimer's disease between male and female patients determined by integrative network analysis. J Cell Mol Med. 2019; 23(1): 47‐ 58. 30394676 PMC6307813 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationFemale-specific pathways are enriched in immune response, insulin signaling, and tau phosphorylation.
“Female‐specific pathways were found to be enriched in immune response, 17 , 18 , 19 insulin signaling, 20 , 21 and tau phosphorylation, 22”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites [17] Paranjpe MD, Belonwu S, Wang JK, et al. Sex‐specific cross tissue meta‐analysis identifies immune dysregulation in women with Alzheimer's disease. Front Aging Neurosci. 2021; 13: 735611. 34658838 PMC8515049 source
- cites [20] Santiago JA, Quinn JP, Potashkin JA. Sex‐specific transcriptional rewiring in the brain of Alzheimer's disease patients. Front Aging Neurosci. 2022; 14: 1009368. 36389068 PMC9659968 source
- cites [22] Cáceres A, González JR. Female‐specific risk of Alzheimer's disease is associated with tau phosphorylation processes: a transcriptome‐wide interaction analysis. Neurobiol Aging. 2020; 96: 104‐ 108. 32977080 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMale-specific pathways are linked to nicotine addiction, adipocytokine signaling, and alcoholism.
“while male‐specific pathways were linked to nicotine addiction, adipocytokine signaling, and alcoholism. 20”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] Santiago JA, Quinn JP, Potashkin JA. Sex‐specific transcriptional rewiring in the brain of Alzheimer's disease patients. Front Aging Neurosci. 2022; 14: 1009368. 36389068 PMC9659968 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationFemales account for two-thirds of AD patients and have a higher lifetime risk of developing AD than males.
“Females account for two‐thirds of AD patients and experience a higher lifetime risk of developing AD compared to males.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [1] 2024 Alzheimer's Disease Facts and Figures. Alzheimers Dement, 2024. 20(5): 3708‐ 3821. 38689398 PMC11095490 source
The Prevalence section reports that almost two-thirds of Americans with Alzheimer’s are women and estimates a higher lifetime risk for women than men using Framingham Heart Study data. The citing sentence presents these U.S.-based figures without a geographic qualifier; the paper does not establish them for all AD patients worldwide. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe DLPFC controls working memory and executive function and is a key neocortical region affected in AD.
“The DLPFC controls working memory and executive function and is a key neocortical region affected in AD.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [27] Blumenfeld RS, Ranganath C. Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex promotes long‐term memory formation through its role in working memory organization. J Neurosci. 2006; 26(3): 916‐ 925. 16421311 PMC6675388 source
The Introduction and fMRI results link the DLPFC to organizing information in working memory, supporting its role in working-memory control. Our copy does not establish that it is a key neocortical region affected in Alzheimer’s disease (AD); a search for AD-related passages found none. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [28] De Jager PL, Ma Y, Mccabe C, et al. A multi‐omic atlas of the human frontal cortex for aging and Alzheimer's disease research. Sci Data. 2018; 5: 180142. 30084846 PMC6080491 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationThese findings are in line with prior work showing robust differences in brain protein expression by sex.
“These findings are in line with our prior work showing robust differences in brain protein expression by sex.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [24] Wingo AP, Liu Y, Gerasimov ES, et al. Sex differences in brain protein expression and disease. Nat Med. 2023; 29(9): 2224‐ 2232. 37653343 PMC10504083 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMDK, SMOC1, and NTN1 have been shown to colocalize with Aβ plaque and are promising biomarkers associated with AD pathology.
“These proteins have been shown to colocalize with Aβ plaque and are promising biomarkers associated with AD pathology.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites [43] Johnson ECB, Carter EK, Dammer EB, et al. Large‐scale deep multi‐layer analysis of Alzheimer's disease brain reveals strong proteomic disease‐related changes not observed at the RNA Level. Nat Neurosci. 2022; 25(2): 213‐ 225. 35115731 PMC8825285 source
The Results section (‘Modules Enriched in Proteins Co-localized with Plaques and Tangles’; page unavailable) names SMOC1, MDK and NTN1 as possible plaque-associated proteins and reports MDK staining consistent with plaque co-localization. It does not establish co-localization for all three individually. The Discussion (page unavailable) says proteins in their module may be promising AD biofluid biomarkers, citing elevated SMOC1 in AD cerebrospinal fluid. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [51] Bai B, Wang X, Li Y, et al. Deep multilayer brain proteomics identifies molecular networks in Alzheimer's disease progression. Neuron. 2020; 105(6): 975‐991 e7. 31926610 PMC7318843 source
The Results section on amyloid plaque pathology reports that MDK and NTN1 are highly colocalized with Aβ plaques, while SMOC1 is partially colocalized. The Results section on CSF proteomics identifies SMOC1 among proteins changed in AD cerebrospinal fluid, but does not establish MDK or NTN1 as biomarker candidates. Thus the colocalization claim is supported, but calling all three promising biomarkers goes beyond the evidence in our copy. Page numbers are unavailable. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [52] Zhou M, Haque RU, Dammer EB, et al. Targeted mass spectrometry to quantify brain‐derived cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers in Alzheimer's disease. Clin Proteomics. 2020; 17: 19. 32514259 PMC7257173 source
The Results and Discussion identify SMOC1 as a promising CSF biomarker associated with AD pathology. Our copy does not report that SMOC1 colocalizes with Aβ plaques, or establish the stated findings for MDK and NTN1 (searched: colocalization, plaques, MDK, and NTN1). (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMARCKS is a cellular substrate for protein kinase C (PKC).
“MARCKS is a cellular substrate for protein kinase C (PKC) (Figure S5) and the phosphorylation level of MARCKS is associated with AD. 53 , 54”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [53] Chen Z, Zhang W, Selmi C, et al. The myristoylated alanine‐rich C‐kinase Substrates (MARCKS): a membrane‐anchored mediator of the cell function. Autoimmun Rev. 2021; 20(11): 102942. 34509657 PMC9746065 source
- cites [54] Fujita K, Motoki K, Tagawa K, et al. HMGB1, a pathogenic molecule that induces neurite degeneration via TLR4‐MARCKS, is a potential therapeutic target for Alzheimer's Disease. Sci Rep. 2016; 6: 31895. 27557632 PMC4997258 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationTRIM46 is associated with proper microtubule functions.
“Among these proteins, TOGARAM1 and TRIM46 are associated with proper microtubule functions, 55 , 56 and MTFR1L is associated with mitochondrial fusion processes. 57”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [55] Latour BL, et al. Dysfunction of the Ciliary ARMC9/TOGARAM1 protein module causes Joubert Syndrome. J Clin Invest. 2020; 130(8): 4423‐ 4439. 32453716 PMC7410078 source
The paper’s discussion of ciliary microtubules and tubulin modifications concerns ARMC9 and TOGARAM1, not TRIM46. A search of our full-text copy for “TRIM46” and “TRIM46 microtubule functions” found no passage addressing TRIM46’s role; page numbers were not available for the indexed passages. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [56] van Beuningen SFB, et al. TRIM46 controls neuronal polarity and axon specification by driving the formation of parallel microtubule arrays. Neuron. 2015; 88(6): 1208‐ 1226. 26671463 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe phosphorylation level of MARCKS is associated with AD.
“MARCKS is a cellular substrate for protein kinase C (PKC) (Figure S5) and the phosphorylation level of MARCKS is associated with AD. 53 , 54”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [53] Chen Z, Zhang W, Selmi C, et al. The myristoylated alanine‐rich C‐kinase Substrates (MARCKS): a membrane‐anchored mediator of the cell function. Autoimmun Rev. 2021; 20(11): 102942. 34509657 PMC9746065 source
- cites [54] Fujita K, Motoki K, Tagawa K, et al. HMGB1, a pathogenic molecule that induces neurite degeneration via TLR4‐MARCKS, is a potential therapeutic target for Alzheimer's Disease. Sci Rep. 2016; 6: 31895. 27557632 PMC4997258 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationTOGARAM1 is associated with proper microtubule functions.
“Among these proteins, TOGARAM1 and TRIM46 are associated with proper microtubule functions, 55 , 56 and MTFR1L is associated with mitochondrial fusion processes. 57”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [55] Latour BL, et al. Dysfunction of the Ciliary ARMC9/TOGARAM1 protein module causes Joubert Syndrome. J Clin Invest. 2020; 130(8): 4423‐ 4439. 32453716 PMC7410078 source
- cites [56] van Beuningen SFB, et al. TRIM46 controls neuronal polarity and axon specification by driving the formation of parallel microtubule arrays. Neuron. 2015; 88(6): 1208‐ 1226. 26671463 source
The section on parallel microtubule organization in the proximal axon describes TRIM46’s role in microtubule organization, not TOGARAM1’s. Searches of our copy for “TOGARAM1” and its expanded name found no passage addressing TOGARAM1’s function, so this source does not verify the specific claim attributed to it. (LLM, conf=0.74)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataFunctional enrichment used all quality-control-passed proteins as the background set and Benjamini-Hochberg FDR correction.
“All proteins that passed the quality control (n = 10,030) were used as the background set. The z‐score was used to determine overrepresentation of ontologies and one‐sided Fisher's exact test (Benjamini–Hochberg false discover rate [FDR] corrected) was used to assess the significance of the z‐score.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [46] Yu G, Wang L‐G, Han Y, He Q‐Y. clusterProfiler: an R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. OMICS. 2012; 16(5): 284‐ 287. 22455463 PMC3339379 source
The Materials and Methods section describes functional enrichment tests and FDR control, but specifies Storey q-values rather than Benjamini–Hochberg correction. It does not say that quality-control-passed proteins were used as the background set; the Results instead describe an example analysis of gene clusters. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationSurrogate variable analysis was used to detect hidden technical or biological factors that may influence brain protein expression, and significant surrogate variables were adjusted for as covariates.
“The surrogate variable analysis (SVA) method in the sva R package (version 3.52.0) 45 was used to detect potentially hidden variables that may influence brain protein expression.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [45] Leek JT, Johnson WE, Parker HS, Jaffe AE, Storey JD. The sva Package for removing batch effects and other unwanted variation in high‐throughput experiments. Bioinformatics. 2012; 28(6): 882‐ 883. 22257669 PMC3307112 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSLC22A5 is a carnitine transporter involved in neurotransmitter synthesis.
“SLC22A5 is a carnitine transporter involved in neurotransmitter synthesis, and expression of SLC22A5 is regulated by estrogen receptors. 62”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [62] Wang C, Uray IP, Mazumdar A, Mayer JA, Brown PH. SLC22A5/OCTN2 expression in breast cancer is induced by estrogen via a novel intronic estrogen‐response element (ERE). Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012; 134(1): 101‐ 115. 22212555 PMC3416040 source
The Results section identifies SLC22A5 as a carnitine transporter, and the Abstract reports that estrogen stimulates its expression in an estrogen receptor-dependent manner. The paper discusses carnitine transport and lipid metabolism, but does not support the attributed involvement in neurotransmitter synthesis; a search for that phrase found no relevant passage. Page numbers were not provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationDCUN1D5 is involved in the neddylation pathway that regulates protein homeostasis.
“DCUN1D5 is involved in the neddylation pathway that regulates protein homeostasis, 58 and S100A12 is a pro‐inflammatory mediator that modulates neuroinflammation. 59”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [58] Zhang S, Yu Q, Li Z, Zhao Y, Sun Y. Protein neddylation and its role in health and diseases. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2024; 9(1): 85. 38575611 PMC10995212 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPLCD3 is a phospholipase C (PLC) isozyme activated by G protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER) and is involved in phosphoinositide turnover and PKC activation.
“PLCD3 is a phospholipase C (PLC) isozyme activated by G protein‐coupled estrogen receptor (GPER) and is involved in phosphoinositide turnover and protein kinase C (PKC) activation. 60 , 61”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [60] Roque C, Mendes‐Oliveira J, Duarte‐Chendo C, Baltazar G. The Role of G protein‐coupled estrogen receptor 1 on neurological disorders. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2019; 55: 100786. 31513775 source
- cites [61] Prossnitz ER, Barton M. The G protein‐coupled oestrogen receptor GPER in health and disease: an update. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2023; 19(7): 407‐ 424. 37193881 PMC10187525 source
The Molecular signalling mediated by GPER section (page unavailable) describes a GPER-initiated PLCβ–PKC pathway and PKC activation following calcium mobilization. It does not identify PLCD3 as the PLC isozyme activated by GPER or describe PLCD3-mediated phosphoinositide turnover. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPANK4 is one of the pantothenate kinase isozymes implicated in coenzyme A biosynthesis.
“Of these two proteins, PANK4 showed a sex‐biased association with global AD pathology and is one of the pantothenate kinase isozymes implicated in coenzyme A biosynthesis. 63”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [63] Munshi MI, Yao SJ, Ben Mamoun C. Redesigning therapies for pantothenate kinase‐associated neurodegeneration. J Biol Chem. 2022; 298(3): 101577. 35041826 PMC8861153 source
The Models of PKAN section identifies PANK4 as one of four human PANK-like genes, and the therapeutic-strategies section describes how its activity may affect the availability of CoA precursors. But the paper distinguishes PANK4 from the three active pantothenate kinases: it lacks the residues required for kinase activity and instead has phosphatase activity. Calling it a pantothenate kinase isozyme therefore overstates the source. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMTFR1L is associated with mitochondrial fusion processes.
“Among these proteins, TOGARAM1 and TRIM46 are associated with proper microtubule functions, 55 , 56 and MTFR1L is associated with mitochondrial fusion processes. 57”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [57] Tilokani L, Russell FM, Hamilton S, et al. AMPK‐dependent phosphorylation of MTFR1L regulates mitochondrial morphology. Sci Adv. 2022; 8(45): eabo7956. 36367943 PMC9651865 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPLCD3 is a phospholipase C (PLC) isozyme activated by G protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER).
“Both PLCD3 and SLC22A5 are associated with estrogen‐related signaling pathways (Figure S5), with PLCD3 being a phospholipase C (PLC) isozyme activated by G protein‐coupled estrogen receptor (GPER) 60 , 61 and SLC22A5 being a carnitine transport protein transcriptionally regulated by estrogen receptors. 62”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [60] Roque C, Mendes‐Oliveira J, Duarte‐Chendo C, Baltazar G. The Role of G protein‐coupled estrogen receptor 1 on neurological disorders. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2019; 55: 100786. 31513775 source
- cites [61] Prossnitz ER, Barton M. The G protein‐coupled oestrogen receptor GPER in health and disease: an update. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2023; 19(7): 407‐ 424. 37193881 PMC10187525 source
The ‘Molecular signalling mediated by GPER’ section describes GPER signalling through a PLCβ–PKC pathway, supporting a connection between GPER and a phospholipase C isozyme. It does not identify PLCD3 or say that GPER activates PLCD3 specifically; the named isozyme is PLCβ. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPLCD is highly expressed in the brain and has been associated with AD and neurodegenerative diseases.
“PLCD is highly expressed in the brain and has been associated with AD and neurodegenerative diseases. 72”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [72] Lim K‐H, Yang S, Kim S‐H, Ko E, Kang M, Joo J‐Y. Cryptic mutations of PLC family members in brain disorders: recent discoveries and a deep‐learning‐based Approach. Brain. 2023; 146(4): 1267‐ 1280. 36448305 PMC10115239 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSOS1 is a guanine nucleotide exchange factor that activates the RAS signaling cascade.
“SOS1 showed a significant sex interaction with CAA and is a guanine nucleotide exchange factor that activates the RAS signaling cascade. 64”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [64] Baltanás FC, Zarich N, Rojas‐Cabañeros JM, Santos E. SOS GEFs in health and disease. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer. 2020; 1874(2): 188445. 33035641 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationS100A12 is a pro-inflammatory protein localized within Aβ plaques.
“For instance, S100A12 is a pro‐inflammatory protein localized within Aβ plaques. 59 , 77”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [59] Shepherd CE, Goyette J, Utter V, et al. Inflammatory S100A9 and S100A12 proteins in Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2006; 27(11): 1554‐ 1563. 16253391 source
- cites [77] Cristóvão JS, Gomes CM. S100 proteins in Alzheimer's disease. Front Neurosci. 2019; 13: 463. 31156365 PMC6532343 source
The S100A12 section reports S100A12 hexamers associated with senile plaques in AD brains, and the Outlook says S100A12 is found within amyloid plaques. The S100 Protein Family section describes pro-inflammatory activity for some S100 proteins, but the copy does not establish that activity specifically for S100A12. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationFemales with MCI or AD dementia show greater cognitive decline and are outperformed by males in several cognitive domains.
“Research has shown that females with MCI or AD dementia shows greater cognitive decline and are outperformed by males in several cognitive domains. 68 , 69”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [68] Sohn D, Shpanskaya K, Lucas JE, et al. Sex differences in cognitive decline in subjects with high likelihood of mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's disease. Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1): 7490. 29748598 PMC5945611 source
The Results section reports significantly greater ADAS-Cog11 worsening in females than males with a high likelihood of MCI due to AD. The Introduction describes faster decline after MCI or AD onset as emerging evidence, but this study did not examine AD dementia. The Discussion says other cognitive domains still need examination, so it does not establish that males outperform females in several domains. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [69] Laws KR, Irvine K, Gale TM. Sex differences in cognitive impairment in Alzheimer's disease. World J Psychiatry. 2016; 6(1): 54‐ 65. 27014598 PMC4804268 source
The Conclusion (page not provided) says men with AD outperform women across multiple cognitive domains, and a later passage says female patients with MCI show increased vulnerability to cognitive impairment earlier in the illness. But the Conclusion describes evidence that females deteriorate faster as limited and calls for longitudinal studies; the claim presents greater cognitive decline across MCI or AD dementia more definitively than the review does. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSLC22A5 is a carnitine transport protein transcriptionally regulated by estrogen receptors.
“Both PLCD3 and SLC22A5 are associated with estrogen‐related signaling pathways (Figure S5), with PLCD3 being a phospholipase C (PLC) isozyme activated by G protein‐coupled estrogen receptor (GPER) 60 , 61 and SLC22A5 being a carnitine transport protein transcriptionally regulated by estrogen receptors. 62”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [62] Wang C, Uray IP, Mazumdar A, Mayer JA, Brown PH. SLC22A5/OCTN2 expression in breast cancer is induced by estrogen via a novel intronic estrogen‐response element (ERE). Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012; 134(1): 101‐ 115. 22212555 PMC3416040 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSOS1 activates the RAS signaling pathway.
“SOS1 activates the RAS signaling pathway, and its expression level is elevated in the blood of AD patients. 78”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [78] Sim K‐Y, Park S‐H, Choi KY, et al. High‐throughput epitope profiling of antibodies in the plasma of Alzheimer's disease patients using random peptide microarrays. Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1): 4587. 30872784 PMC6418098 source
The Discussion and Table 2 report increased SOS1 expression in pyramidal neurons of AD patients, not in their blood. The Discussion mentions RAS only as the renin–angiotensin signalling pathway; it does not say that SOS1 activates it or another RAS pathway. The Results identify SOS1 as a potential target of antibodies upregulated in plasma, which is not a measurement of blood SOS1 expression. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSex differences in mitochondrial metabolism have been reported in AD.
“Although sex differences in immune response 17 , 18 , 19 and mitochondrial metabolism 79 have been reported in AD, other molecular processes identified here remain understudied.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [79] Zhao L, Mao Z, Woody SK, Brinton RD. Sex differences in metabolic aging of the brain: insights into female susceptibility to Alzheimer's Disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2016; 42: 69‐ 79. 27143423 PMC5644989 source
The Results report sex differences in age-related expression of genes involved in energy metabolism, including mitochondrial electron transport and oxidative phosphorylation. But the Abstract and Discussion describe measurements in aging mice relevant to preclinical AD risk, not mitochondrial metabolism measured in people with AD; “in AD” extends the finding beyond the studied population and condition. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSex differences in immune response have been reported in AD.
“Although sex differences in immune response 17 , 18 , 19 and mitochondrial metabolism 79 have been reported in AD, other molecular processes identified here remain understudied.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites [17] Paranjpe MD, Belonwu S, Wang JK, et al. Sex‐specific cross tissue meta‐analysis identifies immune dysregulation in women with Alzheimer's disease. Front Aging Neurosci. 2021; 13: 735611. 34658838 PMC8515049 source
- cites [18] Brooks LRK, Mias GI. Data‐driven analysis of age, sex, and tissue effects on gene expression variability in Alzheimer's Disease. Front Neurosci. 2019; 13: 392. 31068785 PMC6491842 source
Results §3.3 reports a significant sex-by-disease interaction for CXCR4, and Discussion §4.2 identifies it as a chemokine receptor involved in inflammatory and neuroinflammatory signaling. This supports a sex difference in an immune-related gene in AD, but the paper does not directly establish a sex difference in immune response more broadly. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [19] Barber AJ, Del Genio CL, Swain AB, et al. Age, Sex and Alzheimer's Disease: a Longitudinal Study of 3xTg‐AD mice reveals sex‐specific disease trajectories and inflammatory responses mirrored in postmortem brains from Alzheimer's patients. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2024; 16(1): 134. 38909241 PMC11193202 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMTFR1L is associated with mitochondrial metabolism.
“Both MTFR1L and PANK4 are associated with mitochondrial metabolism, with MTFR1L implicated in mitochondrial fusion process 57 and PANK4 involved in coenzyme A biosynthesis. 63”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [57] Tilokani L, Russell FM, Hamilton S, et al. AMPK‐dependent phosphorylation of MTFR1L regulates mitochondrial morphology. Sci Adv. 2022; 8(45): eabo7956. 36367943 PMC9651865 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPANK4 is associated with mitochondrial metabolism.
“Both MTFR1L and PANK4 are associated with mitochondrial metabolism, with MTFR1L implicated in mitochondrial fusion process 57 and PANK4 involved in coenzyme A biosynthesis. 63”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [63] Munshi MI, Yao SJ, Ben Mamoun C. Redesigning therapies for pantothenate kinase‐associated neurodegeneration. J Biol Chem. 2022; 298(3): 101577. 35041826 PMC8861153 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationDCUN1D5 regulates the protein neddylation pathway that has been linked to AD.
“Moreover, TRIM46 and TOGARAM1 are proteins that play roles in microtubule functions, 55 , 56 and DCUN1D5 regulates the protein neddylation pathway that has been linked to AD. 58”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [58] Zhang S, Yu Q, Li Z, Zhao Y, Sun Y. Protein neddylation and its role in health and diseases. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2024; 9(1): 85. 38575611 PMC10995212 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSOS1 expression level is elevated in the blood of AD patients.
“SOS1 activates the RAS signaling pathway, and its expression level is elevated in the blood of AD patients. 78”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [78] Sim K‐Y, Park S‐H, Choi KY, et al. High‐throughput epitope profiling of antibodies in the plasma of Alzheimer's disease patients using random peptide microarrays. Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1): 4587. 30872784 PMC6418098 source
The Discussion reports increased SOS1 expression in pyramidal neurons of AD patients, not in their blood. The Results identify SOS1 as a potential target of upregulated antibodies in plasma; they do not report elevated blood SOS1 expression. The cited passages also do not establish that SOS1 activates RAS signaling. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSMOC1, NTN1, and MDK are strongly associated with amyloid plaques and are considered hub proteins in both AsymAD and AD.
“These proteins are strongly associated with amyloid plaques and are considered hub proteins in both AsymAD and AD. 43 , 51 , 80”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites [43] Johnson ECB, Carter EK, Dammer EB, et al. Large‐scale deep multi‐layer analysis of Alzheimer's disease brain reveals strong proteomic disease‐related changes not observed at the RNA Level. Nat Neurosci. 2022; 25(2): 213‐ 225. 35115731 PMC8825285 source
The Results section on plaque- and tangle-associated modules identifies SMOC1, NTN1, and MDK as plaque-associated proteins, and the Discussion says they correlate with Aβ. Extended Data calls MDK a hub protein of the M42 module, which the Results report is elevated in both AsymAD and AD. Our copy does not identify all three proteins as hubs in both conditions. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [51] Bai B, Wang X, Li Y, et al. Deep multilayer brain proteomics identifies molecular networks in Alzheimer's disease progression. Neuron. 2020; 105(6): 975‐991 e7. 31926610 PMC7318843 source
The Results section, “Pathway Ranking and Top-ranked Proteins in Amyloid Plaque Pathology” (page unavailable), reports plaque accumulation of MDK, NTN1, and SMOC1 in AD; MDK and NTN1 were highly colocalized with plaques, while SMOC1 was only partially colocalized. The cited passages do not establish that all three are hub proteins in both asymptomatic AD (AsymAD) and AD. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [80] Higginbotham L, Ping L, Dammer EB, et al. Integrated proteomics reveals brain‐based cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers in asymptomatic and symptomatic Alzheimer's disease. Sci Adv. 2020; 6(43). PMC7577712 33087358 source
The Results sections ‘Disease-related brain modules are preserved in AsymAD’ and ‘Overlap between brain protein and RNA networks’ report changes in SMOC1 and MDK in AsymAD and AD, and describe strong amyloid-plaque associations as a likely explanation for changes that include NTN1 and MDK. They do not identify the three proteins as hub proteins in both conditions, establish a plaque association for SMOC1, or specifically report an AsymAD change for NTN1. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationCHRM3 is involved in the acetylcholine pathway.
“Similarly, the muscarinic cholinergic receptor CHRM3, which is involved in the acetylcholine pathway, 84 was significantly upregulated in both AD and Lewy body pathology.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [84] Kruse AC, Kobilka BK, Gautam D, Sexton PM, Christopoulos A, Wess J. Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors: novel opportunities for drug development. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2014; 13(7): 549‐ 560. 24903776 PMC5818261 source
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataCompared to male participants, female participants had an older age at death and received fewer years of education.
“Compared to male participants, female participants had an older age at death (β [SE] = 2.8 [0.5]; p < 0.001) and received fewer years of education (β [SE] = −1.4 [0.3]; p < 0.001).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimNot yet classified.
FindingDownregulated proteins in AD were enriched for synaptic signaling, axon development, and actin filament organization.
“The downregulated proteins in AD were enriched for synaptic signaling, axon development, and actin filament organization (Figure S1, Table S4).”
Quote in the paperNot yet classifiedMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFemales showed more severe arteriolosclerosis than males, while no significant sex differences were found in other age-related neuropathologic conditions.
“For age‐related pathologies, females showed more severe arteriolosclerosis than males (β [SE] = 0.15 [0.07]; p = 0.043) while no significant sex differences were found in other age‐related neuropathologic conditions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataAfter quality control, 10,030 proteins were considered in the study.
“After quality control, 10,030 proteins were considered in our study.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAmong these proteins, 59% had higher abundance in cognitive stability and 41% had lower abundance in cognitive stability.
“Among these proteins, 59% had higher abundance (i.e., positive betas) in cognitive stability, while 41% had lower abundance (i.e., negative betas) in cognitive stability (Figure 1B).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThere were no significant sex differences in cognitive diagnosis or APOE ε4 status.
“There were no significant sex differences in cognitive diagnosis (p = 0.41) and APOE ε4 status (p = 0.90).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataAll participants were of European ancestry, with an average age of 89.4 years at death and an average of 15.9 years of education.
“All participants were of European ancestry, with an average age of 89.4 at death and an average of 15.9 years of education.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe study included 770 ROS/MAP participants with deep brain proteomic profiles, of whom 66.2% were female.
“We examined brain proteomes profiled from the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex of 770 donors (66.2% female).”
- Also stated in: § Study participants · plain
“This study included 770 participants and their cognitive diagnosis at the time of death consisted of 33.4% no cognitive impairment (NCI), 26.9% mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and 39.7% AD dementia.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Study participants · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataOf the 1467 sex-differentiated proteins, 41% had higher expression in males and 59% had higher expression in females.
“Of these, 41% had higher expression in males and 59% had higher expression in females (Table S2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFemale participants had a higher global AD pathology score and a higher neurofibrillary tangle score than males after adjusting for education and age at death.
“When comparing AD hallmark pathology by sex, female participants had a higher global AD pathology score (β [SE] = 0.11 [0.03]; p < 0.001) and a higher neurofibrillary tangle score (β [SE] = 0.38 [0.09]; p < 0.001) after adjusting for education and age at death.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCompared to males, females had lower cognitive scores at each assessment timepoint, indicating steeper rates of decline in global cognition and cognitive abilities.
“Compared to male participants, female participants had lower cognitive scores at each assessment timepoint (i.e., negative time‐by‐sex interaction term), indicating steeper rates of decline in global cognition and cognitive abilities (Table S1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataBoth female and male participants displayed significant declines in global cognition and different cognitive domains over time.
“Both female and male participants displayed significant declines in global cognition and different cognitive domains over time.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAt baseline, females showed better episodic memory and perceptual speed, while males showed better visuospatial ability, after adjusting for age and education.
“At baseline, female participants showed better performance in episodic memory (β [SE] = 0.17 [0.06]; p = 0.002) and perceptual speed (β [SE] = 0.14 [0.06]; p = 0.024), while male participants showed better baseline visuospatial ability (β [SE] = 0.35 [0.06]; p < 0.001) after adjusting for age and education (Table S1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the joint analysis of AD hallmark pathologies, 1183 proteins were associated with Aβ density, 1309 with tangle density, and 1924 with global AD pathology.
“In the joint analysis of AD hallmark pathologies, 1183 proteins were found to be associated with Aβ density, 1309 with tangle density, and 1924 with global AD pathology (Table S12‐S14).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataJoint analysis in different cognitive domains revealed 1976 differentially expressed proteins for episodic memory, 1576 for working memory, 1501 for semantic memory, 461 for perceptual speed, and four for visuospatial ability.
“Joint analysis in different cognitive domains also revealed many differentially expressed proteins, with 1976 for episodic memory, 1576 for working memory, 1501 for semantic memory, 461 for perceptual speed, and four for visuospatial ability (Figure S2, Table S7‐S11).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFewer proteins were associated with age-related pathologies: 98 with Lewy bodies, 67 with CAA, one with microinfarcts, and no associations with other neuropathologic conditions.
“Fewer proteins were found to be associated with age‐related pathologies: 98 were associated with Lewy bodies, 67 with CAA, one with microinfarcts, and no associations observed with other neuropathologic conditions (Figure S2, Table S17‐S23).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe cognitive diagnosis at death consisted of 33.4% no cognitive impairment, 26.9% mild cognitive impairment, and 39.7% AD dementia.
“This study included 770 participants and their cognitive diagnosis at the time of death consisted of 33.4% no cognitive impairment (NCI), 26.9% mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and 39.7% AD dementia.”
- Also stated in: § Comparing AD and its endophenotypes between females and males · plain
“The final cognitive diagnosis for these participants consisted of 39.7% AD dementia, 26.9% MCI, and 33.4% NCI.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § Comparing AD and its endophenotypes between females and males · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataSex-stratified analyses between AD and control yielded 869 significant proteins in females and 68 in males at FDR < 5%, with 35 proteins significant in both analyses and displaying concordant direction of associations.
“Sex‐stratified analyses between AD and control yielded 869 significant proteins in females and 68 in males at a FDR threshold of 5%, with 35 proteins significant in both analyses and displaying concordant direction of associations (Figure 2A, Table S3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe replication rates for different cognitive abilities were 77% for episodic memory, 84% for working memory, and 56% for semantic memory.
“The replication rates for different cognitive abilities were 77% for episodic memory, 84% for working memory, and 56% for semantic memory.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataDiabetes and hypertension showed significant sex differences in our dataset.
“To test whether comorbid medical conditions confound the moderating effects of sex on these phenotypic outcomes, we performed a sensitivity analysis by adjusting for the presence of diabetes and hypertension, both of which showed significant sex differences in our dataset (Table 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMultiple transcriptomic studies have identified potential molecular mechanisms underlying sex differences in AD.
“Multiple transcriptomic studies have identified potential molecular mechanisms underlying sex differences in AD.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe data suggest the presence of sex differences in baseline cognitive performance, cognitive trajectories, and AD hallmark pathologies.
“In summary, these data suggest the presence of sex differences in baseline cognitive performance, cognitive trajectories, and AD hallmark pathologies.”
- Also stated in: § Highlights · plain
“At the phenotypic level, we found sex differences in baseline cognitive performance, cognitive trajectories, and AD hallmark pathologies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Highlights · plain
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationThe replication rate π1 was used to estimate consistency between sex-stratified analyses; π1 estimates the fraction of true signals and is less dependent on sample size and power.
“To determine the consistency between proteins associated with each trait, we estimated the replication rate, π1, between the sex‐stratified analyses. π1 estimates the fraction of true signals, not just significance, which makes it less dependent on sample size and power 47 and helpful when the two analyses have different sample sizes (i.e., female dataset n = 510, male dataset n = 260).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [47] Storey JD. A direct approach to false discovery rates. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B‐Statistical Methodology. 2002; 64: 479‐ 498.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataLinear regression models for differential expression adjusted for age at death, education, cognitive diagnosis, and surrogate variables.
“To identify proteins differentially expressed between females and males, we performed linear regression with protein abundance as the dependent variable (Y) and sex as the independent variable and covaried for age at death, education, cognitive diagnosis, and SVs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenPrincipal component analysis was used to remove samples with greater than four standard deviations from the mean of either the first or second principal component.
“Principal component analysis was used to remove samples with greater than four standard deviations from the mean of either the first or second principal component.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductcitationSignificant proteins in the larger discovery (female) dataset at FDR < 0.05 were selected from the replication (male) dataset to estimate π1 statistics.
“Significant proteins in the larger discovery (female) dataset at FDR < 0.05 were selected from the replication (male) dataset to estimate the π1 statistics using the qvalue package (version 2.36.0). 48”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [48] Storey JD, Bass A, Dabney A, Robinson D. qvalue: Q‐value Estimation for False Discovery Rate Control. R package version 2.36.0; 2024. http://github.com/jdstorey/qvalue. Available from. source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenA final cognitive diagnosis was made at the time of death after review of all data blinded to neuropathology.
“A final cognitive diagnosis is made at the time of death after review of all data blinded to neuropathology.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenThe effects of protein sequencing batch and post mortem interval were regressed out using linear regression.
“We used linear regression to regress out the effect of protein sequencing batch and post mortem interval.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenProteins with TMT abundance values in at least 30% of samples were included in analyses.
“Proteins with TMT abundance values in at least 30% of samples were included in our analyses.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationS100A12 is a pro-inflammatory mediator that modulates neuroinflammation.
“DCUN1D5 is involved in the neddylation pathway that regulates protein homeostasis, 58 and S100A12 is a pro‐inflammatory mediator that modulates neuroinflammation. 59”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [59] Shepherd CE, Goyette J, Utter V, et al. Inflammatory S100A9 and S100A12 proteins in Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2006; 27(11): 1554‐ 1563. 16253391 source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataOur phenotypic analysis suggests the presence of sex differences in baseline cognitive performance and cognitive trajectories.
“Our phenotypic analysis suggests the presence of sex differences in baseline cognitive performance and cognitive trajectories.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningWe expect to be best powered to detect differences in proteins from neurons and glia, the major cell types in the gray matter that are also highly relevant for AD.
“Notably, we expect to be best powered to detect differences in proteins from neurons and glia, the major cell types in the gray matter that are also highly relevant for AD.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The DLPFC has a relatively lower burden of AD pathology and neuronal loss, even among individuals with advanced AD or advanced age at death.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationown dataThe limited number of significant sex-by-trait interactions may imply a lack of statistical power.
“Second, a limited number of proteins showed significant sex‐by‐trait interactions in our analysis, which may imply a lack of statistical power.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Proteome-wide sex differences in AD remain underexplored.
“proteome‐wide sex differences in AD remain underexplored.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Other molecular processes identified here remain understudied.
“other molecular processes identified here remain understudied.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The DLPFC has a relatively lower burden of AD pathology and neuronal loss, even among individuals with advanced AD or advanced age at death.
“our study focused on tissue from the DLPFC, which was selected owing to the relatively lower burden of AD pathology and neuronal loss, even among individuals with advanced AD or advanced age at death of the participants.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Conflicting p values for sex difference in global AD pathology
MinorThe results text reports p < 0.001 for the sex difference in global AD pathology, while Table 1 reports p = 0.005 for that characteristic. Both values indicate significance, but they cannot both be the reported p value for the same comparison.
“female participants had a higher global AD pathology score (β [SE] = 0.11 [0.03]; p < 0.001)”
“| Global AD pathology score, mean (SD) | 0.748 (0.64) | 0.816 (0.66) | 0.613 (0.59) | 0.005 |”
Claim of lower female scores at every assessment conflicts with baseline results
MinorThe claim that females had lower cognitive scores at each assessment timepoint includes baseline, yet the paper reports better female baseline performance in episodic memory and perceptual speed. A negative time-by-sex interaction indicates a difference in rates of change, not lower scores at every timepoint.
“Compared to male participants, female participants had lower cognitive scores at each assessment timepoint (i.e., negative time‐by‐sex interaction term)”
“At baseline, female participants showed better performance in episodic memory (β [SE] = 0.17 [0.06]; p = 0.002) and perceptual speed (β [SE] = 0.14 [0.06]; p = 0.024)”
Cites
clusterProfiler: an R Package for Comparing Biological Themes Among Gene Clusters
Yu, G., Wang, L.-G., Han, Y., & He, Q.-Y. (2012) · OMICS: A Journal of Integrative Biology · doi:10.1089/omi.2011.0118 · Cited by 36,259 · see citing works
Leek, J. T., Johnson, W. E., Parker, H. S., Jaffe, A. E., & Storey, J. D. (2012) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bts034 · Cited by 6,231 · see citing works
A Direct Approach to False Discovery Rates
Storey, J. D. (2002) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/1467-9868.00346 · Cited by 5,603 · see citing works
2024 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures
(2024) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1002/alz.13809 · Cited by 2,536 · see citing works
Natural history of mild cognitive impairment in older persons
Bennett, D. A., Wilson, R. S., Schneider, J. A., Evans, D. A., Beckett, L. A., Aggarwal, N. T., Barnes, L. L., Fox, J. H., & Bach, J. (2002) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.59.2.198 · Cited by 1,037 · see citing works
Self-citationClinical epidemiology of Alzheimer&rsquo;s disease: assessing sex and gender differences
Mielke, M., Vemuri, P., & Rocca, W. (2014) · Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.2147/clep.s37929 · Cited by 1,021 · see citing works
Sex differences in Alzheimer disease — the gateway to precision medicine
for the Women’s Brain Project and the Alzheimer Precision Medicine Initiative, Ferretti, M. T., Iulita, M. F., Cavedo, E., Chiesa, P. A., Schumacher Dimech, A., Santuccione Chadha, A., Baracchi, F., Girouard, H., Misoch, S., et al. (2018) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/s41582-018-0032-9 · Cited by 1,009 · cited 1× · see citing works
“12–14 Multiple transcriptomic studies have identified potential molecular mechanisms underlying sex differences in AD.”
Johnson, E. C. B., Dammer, E. B., Duong, D. M., Ping, L., Zhou, M., Yin, L., Higginbotham, L. A., Guajardo, A., White, B., Troncoso, J. C., et al. (2020) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-020-0815-6 · Cited by 1,001 · see citing works
Self-citationIndividual differences in rates of change in cognitive abilities of older persons.
Wilson, R. S., Beckett, L. A., Barnes, L. L., Schneider, J. A., Bach, J., Evans, D. A., & Bennett, D. A. (2002) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/0882-7974.17.2.179 · Cited by 842 · see citing works
Self-citationUnderstanding the impact of sex and gender in Alzheimer’s disease: A call to action
Nebel, R. A., Aggarwal, N. T., Barnes, L. L., Gallagher, A., Goldstein, J. M., Kantarci, K., Mallampalli, M. P., Mormino, E. C., Scott, L., Yu, W. H., et al. (2018) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2018.04.008 · Cited by 839 · see citing works
Overview and Findings from the Rush Memory and Aging Project
Bennett, D. A., Schneider, J. A., Buchman, A. S., Barnes, L. L., Boyle, P. A., & Wilson, R. S. (2012) · Current Alzheimer Research · doi:10.2174/156720512801322663 · Cited by 837 · cited 1× · see citing works
“25,26 Both studies recruit older adults who enroll without known dementia and agree to annual clinical evaluation and brain donation at death.”
Self-citationYoshitake, T., Kiyohara, Y., Kato, I., Ohmura, T., Iwamoto, H., Nakayama, K., Ohmori, S., Nomiyama, K., Kawano, H., Ueda, K., et al. (1995) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.45.6.1161 · Cited by 829 · see citing works
Dementia and Alzheimer Disease Incidence: A Prospective Cohort Study
Kukull, W. A., Higdon, R., Bowen, J. D., McCormick, W. C., Teri, L., Schellenberg, G. D., van Belle, G., Jolley, L., & Larson, E. B. (2002) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneur.59.11.1737 · Cited by 806 · cited 1× · see citing works
“7–11 Despite the mixed findings from these incidence studies, sex differences have been observed in the progression, diagnosis, and clinical presentations of AD.”
Overview and Findings from the Religious Orders Study
Bennett, D. A., Schneider, J. A., Arvanitakis, Z., & Wilson, R. S. (2012) · Current Alzheimer Research · doi:10.2174/156720512801322573 · Cited by 647 · cited 1× · see citing works
“25,26 Both studies recruit older adults who enroll without known dementia and agree to annual clinical evaluation and brain donation at death.”
Self-citationDeep Multilayer Brain Proteomics Identifies Molecular Networks in Alzheimer’s Disease Progression
Bai, B., Wang, X., Li, Y., Chen, P.-C., Yu, K., Dey, K. K., Yarbro, J. M., Han, X., Lutz, B. M., Rao, S., et al. (2020) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2019.12.015 · Cited by 632 · cited 2× · see citing works
“43,51,80 Similarly, the muscarinic cholinergic receptor CHRM3, which is involved in the acetylcholine pathway, 84 was significantly upregulated in both AD and Lewy body pathology.”
A multi-omic atlas of the human frontal cortex for aging and Alzheimer’s disease research
De Jager, P. L., Ma, Y., McCabe, C., Xu, J., Vardarajan, B. N., Felsky, D., Klein, H.-U., White, C. C., Peters, M. A., Lodgson, B., et al. (2018) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/sdata.2018.142 · Cited by 598 · see citing works
Self-citationArvanitakis, Z., Capuano, A. W., Leurgans, S. E., Bennett, D. A., & Schneider, J. A. (2016) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(16)30029-1 · Cited by 581 · see citing works
Self-citationJohnson, E. C. B., Carter, E. K., Dammer, E. B., Duong, D. M., Gerasimov, E. S., Liu, Y., Liu, J., Betarbet, R., Ping, L., Yin, L., et al. (2022) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-021-00999-y · Cited by 561 · cited 4× · see citing works
“43 In brief, each sample was homogenized and digested to obtain peptides, followed by isobaric tandem mass tag (TMT) peptide labeling and high pH fractionation.”
InfluentialSelf-citationFratiglioni, L., Viitanen, M., von Strauss, E., Tontodonati, V., Herlitz, A., & Winblad, B. (1997) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.48.1.132 · Cited by 556 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Studies conducted in Europe 2–4 and Asia 5,6 suggest a higher incidence in females at older ages, whereas studies from North and South America have not reported a significant sex difference in the incidence of AD.”
Age-specific incidence rates of Alzheimer’s disease: The Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging
Kawas, C., Gray, S., Brookmeyer, R., Fozard, J., & Zonderman, A. (2000) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.54.11.2072 · Cited by 472 · see citing works
Incidence and Risk of Dementia: The Rotterdam study
Ott, A., Breteler, M. M. B., Harskamp, F. V., Stijnen, T., & Hofman, A. (1998) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009489 · Cited by 455 · cited 1× · see citing works
“3.”
Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors: novel opportunities for drug development
Kruse, A. C., Kobilka, B. K., Gautam, D., Sexton, P. M., Christopoulos, A., & Wess, J. (2014) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd4295 · Cited by 437 · cited 1× · see citing works
“43,51,80 Similarly, the muscarinic cholinergic receptor CHRM3, which is involved in the acetylcholine pathway, 84 was significantly upregulated in both AD and Lewy body pathology.”
Cerebral amyloid angiopathy and cognitive outcomes in community-based older persons
Boyle, P. A., Yu, L., Nag, S., Leurgans, S., Wilson, R. S., Bennett, D. A., & Schneider, J. A. (2015) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000002175 · Cited by 423 · see citing works
Self-citationBennett, D. A., Schneider, J. A., Aggarwal, N. T., Arvanitakis, Z., Shah, R. C., Kelly, J. F., Fox, J. H., Cochran, E. J., Arends, D., Treinkman, A., et al. (2006) · Neuroepidemiology · doi:10.1159/000096129 · Cited by 407 · see citing works
Self-citationLetenneur, L., Gilleron, V, Commenges, D., Helmer, C., Orgogozo, J. M., & Dartigues, J. F. (1999) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp.66.2.177 · Cited by 406 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Studies conducted in Europe 2–4 and Asia 5,6 suggest a higher incidence in females at older ages, whereas studies from North and South America have not reported a significant sex difference in the incidence of AD.”
Blumenfeld, R. S., & Ranganath, C. (2006) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2353-05.2006 · Cited by 383 · see citing works
Age, Sex, andAPOEε4 Effects on Memory, Brain Structure, and β-Amyloid Across the Adult Life Span
Jack, C. R., Wiste, H. J., Weigand, S. D., Knopman, D. S., Vemuri, P., Mielke, M. M., Lowe, V. J., Senjem, M. L., Gunter, J. L., Machulda, M. M., et al. (2015) · JAMA Neurology · doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.4821 · Cited by 382 · see citing works
Higginbotham, L., Ping, L., Dammer, E. B., Duong, D. M., Zhou, M., Gearing, M., Hurst, C., Glass, J. D., Factor, S. A., Johnson, E. C. B., et al. (2020) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aaz9360 · Cited by 367 · see citing works
Self-citationIs the Risk of Developing Alzheimer's Disease Greater for Women than for Men?
Hebert, L. E., Scherr, P. A., McCann, J. J., Beckett, L. A., & Evans, D. A. (2001) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/153.2.132 · Cited by 331 · see citing works
Sex differences in Alzheimer’s disease and common neuropathologies of aging
Oveisgharan, S., Arvanitakis, Z., Yu, L., Farfel, J., Schneider, J. A., & Bennett, D. A. (2018) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/s00401-018-1920-1 · Cited by 330 · see citing works
Self-citationSex differences in cognitive impairment in Alzheimer’s disease
Laws, K. R., Irvine, K., & Gale, T. M. (2016) · World Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.5498/wjp.v6.i1.54 · Cited by 307 · see citing works
Hippocampal sclerosis and <scp>TDP</scp> ‐43 pathology in aging and <scp>A</scp> lzheimer disease
Nag, S., Yu, L., Capuano, A. W., Wilson, R. S., Leurgans, S. E., Bennett, D. A., & Schneider, J. A. (2015) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.24388 · Cited by 305 · see citing works
Self-citationThe relationship between cerebral Alzheimer's disease pathology and odour identification in old age
Wilson, R. S., Arnold, S. E., Schneider, J. A., Tang, Y., & Bennett, D. A. (2006) · Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp.2006.099721 · Cited by 304 · see citing works
Self-citationApolipoprotein E ε4 allele, AD pathology, and the clinical expression of Alzheimer’s disease
Bennett, D. A., Wilson, R. S., Schneider, J. A., Evans, D. A., Aggarwal, N. T., Arnold, S. E., Cochran, E. J., Berry-Kravis, E., & Bienias, J. L. (2003) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000042478.08543.f7 · Cited by 282 · see citing works
Self-citationCognitive impairment, decline and fluctuations in older community-dwelling subjects with Lewy bodies
Schneider, J. A., Arvanitakis, Z., Yu, L., Boyle, P. A., Leurgans, S. E., & Bennett, D. A. (2012) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/aws234 · Cited by 273 · cited 1× · see citing works
“38 In this study, we used a dichotomous variable toindicatethepresenceorabsenceofneocortical-typeLewybodies.”
Self-citationThe G protein-coupled oestrogen receptor GPER in health and disease: an update
Prossnitz, E. R., & Barton, M. (2023) · Nature Reviews Endocrinology · doi:10.1038/s41574-023-00822-7 · Cited by 231 · cited 2× · see citing works
“60,61 PLCD is highly expressed in the brain and has been associated with AD and neurodegenerative diseases.”
van Beuningen, S. F. B., Will, L., Harterink, M., Chazeau, A., van Battum, E. Y., Frias, C. P., Franker, M. A. M., Katrukha, E. A., Stucchi, R., Vocking, K., et al. (2015) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.11.012 · Cited by 225 · see citing works
Sexually divergent induction of microglial-associated neuroinflammation with hippocampal aging
Mangold, C. A., Wronowski, B., Du, M., Masser, D. R., Hadad, N., Bixler, G. V., Brucklacher, R. M., Ford, M. M., Sonntag, W. E., & Freeman, W. M. (2017) · Journal of Neuroinflammation · doi:10.1186/s12974-017-0920-8 · Cited by 203 · see citing works
Ten-year incidence of dementia in a rural elderly US community population: the MoVIES Project
Ganguli, M., Dodge, H. H., Chen, P., Belle, S., & DeKosky, S. T. (2000) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.54.5.1109 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
A genome-wide scan for common variants affecting the rate of age-related cognitive decline
Jager, P. L. D., Shulman, J. M., Chibnik, L. B., Keenan, B. T., Raj, T., Wilson, R. S., Yu, L., Leurgans, S. E., Tran, D., Aubin, C., et al. (2011) · Neurobiology of Aging · doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2011.09.033 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
Self-citationS100 Proteins in Alzheimer’s Disease
Cristóvão, J. S., & Gomes, C. M. (2019) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2019.00463 · Cited by 188 · cited 1× · see citing works
“59,77 SOS1activatestheRASsignalingpathway,anditsexpres-sion level is elevated in the blood of AD patients.”
Protein neddylation and its role in health and diseases
Zhang, S., Yu, Q., Li, Z., Zhao, Y., & Sun, Y. (2024) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-024-01800-9 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
TDP-43 pathology in anterior temporal pole cortex in aging and Alzheimer’s disease
Nag, S., Yu, L., Boyle, P. A., Leurgans, S. E., Bennett, D. A., & Schneider, J. A. (2018) · Acta Neuropathologica Communications · doi:10.1186/s40478-018-0531-3 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Self-citationInflammatory S100A9 and S100A12 proteins in Alzheimer's disease
Shepherd, C. E., Goyette, J., Utter, V., Rahimi, F., Yang, Z., Geczy, C. L., & Halliday, G. M. (2006) · Neurobiology of Aging · doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2005.09.033 · Cited by 161 · cited 2× · see citing works
“59,77 SOS1activatestheRASsignalingpathway,anditsexpres-sion level is elevated in the blood of AD patients.”
Sohn, D., Shpanskaya, K., Lucas, J. E., Petrella, J. R., Saykin, A. J., Tanzi, R. E., Samatova, N. F., & Doraiswamy, P. M. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-25377-w · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Rocca, W. A., Cha, R. H., Waring, S. C., & Kokmen, E. (1998) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009560 · Cited by 160 · cited 1× · see citing works
“7–11 Despite the mixed findings from these incidence studies, sex differences have been observed in the progression, diagnosis, and clinical presentations of AD.”
Fujita, K., Motoki, K., Tagawa, K., Chen, X., Hama, H., Nakajima, K., Homma, H., Tamura, T., Watanabe, H., Katsuno, M., et al. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep31895 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Storey, J. D. (2025) · International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-69359-9_229 · Cited by 152
Claims of Sex Differences: An Empirical Assessment in Genetic Associations
Patsopoulos, N. A., Tatsioni, A., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2007) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.298.8.880 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Zhao, L., Mao, Z., Woody, S. K., & Brinton, R. D. (2016) · Neurobiology of Aging · doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2016.02.011 · Cited by 132 · cited 1× · see citing works
“58 Although sex differences in immune response 17–19 and mitochondrial metabolism 79 been reported in AD, other molecular processes identified here remain understudied.”
Cortical Proteins Associated With Cognitive Resilience in Community-Dwelling Older Persons
Yu, L., Tasaki, S., Schneider, J. A., Arfanakis, K., Duong, D. M., Wingo, A. P., Wingo, T. S., Kearns, N., Thatcher, G. R. J., Seyfried, N. T., et al. (2020) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.1807 · Cited by 127 · cited 1× · see citing works
“49,50 Joint analysis in different cognitive domains also revealed many differentially expressed proteins, with 1976 for episodic memory, 1576 for working memory, 1501 for semantic memory, 461 for perceptual speed, and four for visuospatial ability (Figure S2, Table S7-S11).”
Self-citationSex and age interact to determine clinicopathologic differences in Alzheimer’s disease
Liesinger, A. M., Graff-Radford, N. R., Duara, R., Carter, R. E., Hanna Al-Shaikh, F. S., Koga, S., Hinkle, K. M., DiLello, S. K., Johnson, M. F., Aziz, A., et al. (2018) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/s00401-018-1908-x · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Incidence and subtypes of dementia in southern Taiwan Impact of socio‐demographic factors
Liu, C.-K., Lai, C. L., Tai, C., Lin, R. T., Yen, Y.-C., & Howng, S. L. (1998) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.50.6.1572 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Ghebranious, N. (2005) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gni155 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
SOS GEFs in health and disease
Baltanás, F. C., Zarich, N., Rojas-Cabañeros, J. M., & Santos, E. (2020) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Reviews on Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.bbcan.2020.188445 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Sex differences in brain protein expression and disease
Wingo, A. P., Liu, Y., Gerasimov, E. S., Vattathil, S. M., Liu, J., Cutler, D. J., Epstein, M. P., Blokland, G. A. M., Thambisetty, M., Troncoso, J. C., et al. (2023) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-023-02509-y · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Self-citationSex differences in the genetic predictors of Alzheimer’s pathology
Dumitrescu, L., Barnes, L. L., Thambisetty, M., Beecham, G., Kunkle, B., Bush, W. S., Gifford, K. A., Chibnik, L. B., Mukherjee, S., De Jager, P. L., et al. (2019) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awz206 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Zhou, M., Haque, R. U., Dammer, E. B., Duong, D. M., Ping, L., Johnson, E. C. B., Lah, J. J., Levey, A. I., & Seyfried, N. T. (2020) · Clinical Proteomics · doi:10.1186/s12014-020-09285-8 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Self-citationTagawa, K., Homma, H., Saito, A., Fujita, K., Chen, X., Imoto, S., Oka, T., Ito, H., Motoki, K., Yoshida, C., et al. (2015) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/ddu475 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Cognitive function in the oldest old: women perform better than men
van Exel, E. R. (2001) · Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp.71.1.29 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
TOMM40 ′523 variant and cognitive decline in older persons with APOE ε3/3 genotype
Yu, L., Lutz, M. W., Wilson, R. S., Burns, D. K., Roses, A. D., Saunders, A. M., Gaiteri, C., Jager, P. L. D., Barnes, L. L., & Bennett, D. A. (2017) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000003614 · Cited by 78 · cited 1× · see citing works
“41,42”
Self-citationDysfunction of the ciliary ARMC9/TOGARAM1 protein module causes Joubert syndrome
Latour, B. L., Van De Weghe, J. C., Rusterholz, T. D. S., Letteboer, S. J. F., Gomez, A., Shaheen, R., Gesemann, M., Karamzade, A., Asadollahi, M., Barroso-Gil, M., et al. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci131656 · Cited by 76 · cited 2× · see citing works
“63 Moreover, TRIM46 and TOGARAM1 are proteins that play roles in microtubule functions, 55,56 and DCUN1D5 regulates the protein neddylation pathway that has been linked to AD.”
Chen, Z., Zhang, W., Selmi, C., Ridgway, W. M., Leung, P. S. C., Zhang, F., & Gershwin, M. E. (2021) · Autoimmunity Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.autrev.2021.102942 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Haque, R., Watson, C. M., Liu, J., Carter, E. K., Duong, D. M., Lah, J. J., Wingo, A. P., Roberts, B. R., Johnson, E. C. B., Saykin, A. J., et al. (2023) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.adg4122 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Self-citationAMPK-dependent phosphorylation of MTFR1L regulates mitochondrial morphology
Tilokani, L., Russell, F. M., Hamilton, S., Virga, D. M., Segawa, M., Paupe, V., Gruszczyk, A. V., Protasoni, M., Tabara, L.-C., Johnson, M., et al. (2022) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abo7956 · Cited by 60 · cited 2× · see citing works
“57 DCUN1D5 is involved in the neddylation pathway that regulates protein homeostasis, 58 and S100A12 is a pro-inflammatory mediator that modulates neuroinflammation.”
Wang, C., Uray, I. P., Mazumdar, A., Mayer, J. A., & Brown, P. H. (2012) · Breast Cancer Research and Treatment · doi:10.1007/s10549-011-1925-0 · Cited by 59 · cited 1× · see citing works
“62 PKC also regulates the activity and translocation of SLC22A5.”
Quantitative phosphoproteomics uncovers dysregulated kinase networks in Alzheimer’s disease
Morshed, N., Lee, M. J., Rodriguez, F. H., Lauffenburger, D. A., Mastroeni, D., & White, F. M. (2021) · Nature Aging · doi:10.1038/s43587-021-00071-1 · Cited by 58 · cited 1× · see citing works
“75,76 This suggests that different PKC activity between females and males may account for some of the sex differences in AD.”
Estrogen Receptor Genes, Cognitive Decline, and Alzheimer Disease
Oveisgharan, S., Yang, J., Yu, L., Burba, D., Bang, W., Tasaki, S., Grodstein, F., Wang, Y., Zhao, J., De Jager, P. L., et al. (2023) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000206833 · Cited by 53 · cited 2× · see citing works
“16 Female-specific pathways were found to be enriched in immune response, 17–19 insulin signaling, 20,21 and tau phosphorylation, 22 while male-specific pathways were linked to nicotine addiction, adipocytokine signaling, and alcoholism.”
Self-citationLarge‐scale deep proteomic analysis in Alzheimer's disease brain regions across race and ethnicity
Seifar, F., Fox, E. J., Shantaraman, A., Liu, Y., Dammer, E. B., Modeste, E., Duong, D. M., Yin, L., Trautwig, A. N., Guo, Q., et al. (2024) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1002/alz.14360 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Self-citationParanjpe, M. D., Belonwu, S., Wang, J. K., Oskotsky, T., Gupta, A., Taubes, A., Zalocusky, K. A., Paranjpe, I., Glicksberg, B. S., Huang, Y., et al. (2021) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2021.735611 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Santiago, J. A., Bottero, V., & Potashkin, J. A. (2019) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2019.01273 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
The role of G protein-coupled estrogen receptor 1 on neurological disorders
Roque, C., Mendes-Oliveira, J., Duarte-Chendo, C., & Baltazar, G. (2019) · Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.yfrne.2019.100786 · Cited by 41 · cited 2× · see citing works
“60,61 PLCD is highly expressed in the brain and has been associated with AD and neurodegenerative diseases.”
Barber, A. J., del Genio, C. L., Swain, A. B., Pizzi, E. M., Watson, S. C., Tapiavala, V. N., Zanazzi, G. J., & Gaur, A. B. (2024) · Alzheimer's Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/s13195-024-01492-x · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Sun, L., Yang, S., Sun, H., Li, W., & Duan, S. (2019) · Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1111/jcmm.13852 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Brooks, L. R. K., & Mias, G. I. (2019) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2019.00392 · Cited by 32 · cited 1× · see citing works
“85 Limited findings from genome-wide 86 and transcriptome-wide 18,22 associationstudiesinADalsosuggestthatthe sample size is a critical consideration when examining sex interactions.”
Redesigning therapies for pantothenate kinase–associated neurodegeneration
Munshi, M. I., Yao, S. J., & Ben Mamoun, C. (2022) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jbc.2022.101577 · Cited by 32 · cited 2× · see citing works
“63 SOS1 showed a significant sex interaction with CAA and is a guanine nucleotide exchange factor that activates the RAS signaling cascade.”
Su, R., Han, Z.-Y., Fan, J.-P., & Zhang, Y.-L. (2010) · Neuroscience Bulletin · doi:10.1007/s12264-010-0131-0 · Cited by 27 · cited 1× · see citing works
“53,54,73 SLC22A5 is a carnitine transporter involved in neurotransmitter synthesis, and expression of SLC22A5 is regulated by estrogen receptors.”
Golchert, J., Röhr, S., Luck, T., Wagner, M., Fuchs, Â., Wiese, B., van den Bussche, H., Brettschneider, C., Werle, J., Bickel, H., et al. (2019) · Journal of Alzheimer s Disease · doi:10.3233/jad-180949 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Lim, K.-H., Yang, S., Kim, S.-H., Ko, E., Kang, M., & Joo, J.-Y. (2023) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awac451 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Sim, K.-Y., Park, S.-H., Choi, K. Y., Park, J. E., Lee, J. S., Kim, B. C., Gwak, J., Song, W. K., Lee, K. H., & Park, S.-G. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-40976-x · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Cáceres, A., & González, J. R. (2020) · Neurobiology of Aging · doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2020.08.020 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Sex-specific transcriptional rewiring in the brain of Alzheimer’s disease patients
Santiago, J. A., Quinn, J. P., & Potashkin, J. A. (2022) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2022.1009368 · Cited by 16 · cited 2× · see citing works
“16 Female-specific pathways were found to be enriched in immune response, 17–19 insulin signaling, 20,21 and tau phosphorylation, 22 while male-specific pathways were linked to nicotine addiction, adipocytokine signaling, and alcoholism.”
Jurkiewicz, D., Michalec, K., Skowronek, K., & Nałęcz, K. A. (2017) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Cell Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbamcr.2017.02.014 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Zammit, A. R., Klein, H.-U., Yu, L., Levey, A. I., Seyfried, N. T., Wingo, A. P., Wingo, T. S., Schneider, J. A., Bennett, D. A., & Buchman, A. S. (2024) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000207816 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Self-citation- Self-citation
Shared mechanisms across the major psychiatric and neurodegenerative diseases
Wingo, T. S., Liu, Y., Gerasimov, E. S., Vattathil, S. M., Wynne, M. E., Liu, J., Lori, A., Faundez, V., Bennett, D. A., Seyfried, N. T., et al. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-31873-5 · cited 1×
“24,44 ProteinswithTMTabundance values in at least 30% of samples were included in our analyses.”
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Li, R., Needham, S. R., Kraev, I., Hristova, M., & Lange, S. (2025) · Frontiers in Medical Technology · doi:10.3389/fmedt.2025.1715676 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Pfund, G. N., Ong, A. D., Mroczek, D. K., James, B. D., Jackson, K., Rose, D., Barnes, L. L., Bennett, D. A., & Graham, E. K. (2025) · The Journals of Gerontology Series B · doi:10.1093/geronb/gbaf161 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Self-citationVitali, F., Raikes, A. C., Merlini, S., Shang, Y., Torrandell‐Haro, G., Hernandez, G. D., & Yin, F. (2026) · Alzheimer s & Dementia Translational Research & Clinical Interventions · doi:10.1002/trc2.70303 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
CSF proteogenomics implicates novel proteins and humoral immunity in Alzheimer’s disease riskPreprint
Wingo, A. P., Liu, Y., Mei, Z. L., Wang, M., Vattathil, S., Gerasimov, E. S., Shantaraman, A., Wu, F., Duong, D. M., Fox, E. J., et al. (2025) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2025.09.21.25336297 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“We used available MS-based proteomic brain profiles from donors of the ROS/MAP studies as described 51 .”
Self-citationExpanding the horizon of sex‐specific proteomic insights in Alzheimer's disease
Zhou, Y., Liu, S., & Chen, L. (2025) · Alzheimer s & Dementia · doi:10.1002/alz.70725
Proteomic analysis in Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias: a focus on sex-specific differences
Comas‐Albertí, A., Lladó, A., Esteller, D., Borrego‐Écija, S., Falgàs, N., Dakterzada, F., Pérez‐Millan, A., Puey, R., Collet-Romà, T., Guillén, N., et al. (2026) · Alzheimer s Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/s13195-026-02068-7
“Most available work has focused on AD brain tissue [19–21], while LBD and FTD remain underrepresented in works with sex-stratified analyses.”
Wang, B., Zhang, J., Li, C.-H., Huang, X., Gao, R., Peng, Y., Xie, Q., Ning, Y., Zhao, Y., Yang, N., et al. (2026) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2026.1816702
“While PANK4’s cellular and organismal functions are inadequately explored, Mei et al. found PANK4 as one of ten proteins exhibiting significant sex-by-trait interactions in AD (Mei et al., 2025).”
Zhao, H., Zhu, T., Erabadda, B., Leonenko, G., Maurya, R., Lim, D., Mavromati, K., Quinn, T., Koychev, I. G., Escott‐Price, V., et al. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.05.20.726478
“We also identified proteins associated with transition to cognitive impairment (MCI Core1+ and AD dementia Core1+), including the pseudophosphatase PTPRU [45], the ned-dylation factor DCUN1D5 [46], and the synaptic-vesicle exocytosis regulator CPLX2 [47].”
Chen, F., Ma, Z., & Ma, W. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-10616998/v1
Proteomic dysregulation associated with cerebral amyloid angiopathy
Han, S., Park, Y. H., Pyun, J., Bice, P. J., Bennett, D. A., Oveisgharan, S., Saykin, A. J., Kim, S., & Nho, K. T. (2026) · Alzheimer s & Dementia · doi:10.1002/alz.71901
Self-citationPotential links between PCOS/PMOS and Alzheimer disease and related dementias
Amiri, M., Hamidi, A. K., Farkas, D. L., Buyalos, R. P., & Azziz, R. (2026) · Journal of the Endocrine Society · doi:10.1210/jendso/bvag206
“Proteomic analyses reveal sex-specific brain protein expression patterns and sex-by-trait interactions in AD, implicating estrogen signaling, inflammation, and mitochondrial pathways (93).”
- Authors
- Mei, Z., Liu, J., Bennett, D. A., Seyfried, N., Wingo, A. P., & Wingo, T. S.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Davis (US)
- University of California Davis Medical Center (US)
- Rush University Medical Center (US)
- Emory University (US)
- Atlanta VA Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wingo, Thomas S.
- Venue
- Alzheimer's & Dementia
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2025-05
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- e70206-e70206
- ISSN
- 1552-5260 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-5279
- PMC
- PMC12064417
- OpenAlex
- W4410220219
- Semantic Scholar
- 3fa1c89c14450e94ab04544e8061bbe8513ed184
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 85
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 4
- FWCI
- 5.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Alzheimer s & Dementia (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (I01 BX003853, IK4 BX005219, I01 BX005686)
- National Institutes of Health (R01 AG075827, R01 AG072120, R01 AG079170, P30 AG072972, U01 AG088425, P30AG10161, P30AG72975, R01AG15819, R01AG17917, U01AG46152, U01AG61356)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- Alzheimer's disease, sex differences
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Brain, Female, Humans, Male, Sex Characteristics, Prefrontal Cortex, Proteome, Endophenotypes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-18.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-18.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review