Cited by 11Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications

Unraveling sex differences in Alzheimer's disease and related endophenotypes with brain proteomes

Open access
Mei, Zhen, Liu, Jiaqi, Bennett, David A, Seyfried, Nicholas, Wingo, Aliza P., Wingo, Thomas S.·2025·Alzheimer's & Dementia

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Sex differences exist in Alzheimer's disease (AD), but the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. METHODS: We examined brain proteomes profiled from the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex of 770 donors (66.2% female). RESULTS: Proteome‐wide differential expression analysis in males and females jointly identified many significant proteins for AD dementia ( n = 1228), amyloid beta ( n = 1183), tangles ( n = 1309), and global cognitive trajectory ( n = 2325) at a false discovery rate of <0.05. Sex‐stratified analyses also identified many proteins associated with AD or its endophenotypes. Finally, we found 10 proteins with significant sex‐by‐trait interactions, including one in AD clinical diagnosis (MARCKS), seven in cognitive trajectories (TOGARAM1, PLCD3, SLC22A5, MTFR1L, DCUN1D5, S100A12, and TRIM46), and two in cerebral pathologies (PANK4 and SOS1). DISCUSSION: The 10 proteins with sex interaction in AD cover a range of functions likely relevant for AD pathogenesis, including estrogen response, inflammation, and mitochondrial biology, and their specific roles in AD ought to be studied. Future work should test their potential as sex‐specific AD biomarkers. Highlights: At the phenotypic level, we found sex differences in baseline cognitive performance, cognitive trajectories, and AD hallmark pathologies. Proteome‐wide differential expression analyses identified many brain proteins associated with AD and its endophenotypes in either sex alone or when considered together. We found 10 brain proteins with significant sex interactions in AD and its endophenotypes, which could be investigated as potential sex‐specific biomarkers of AD.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

In 770 ROS/MAP donors with dorsolateral prefrontal cortex proteomes, the study found many proteins associated with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and its endophenotypes, but only 10 proteins showed significant sex-by-trait interactions. The authors conclude these sex-biased proteins implicate estrogen response, inflammation, and mitochondrial biology and warrant testing as potential sex-specific AD biomarkers.

Key findings

  • Phenotypic sex differences included older age at death in females (β [SE] = 2.8 [0.5]; p < 0.001), fewer years of education (β [SE] = −1.4 [0.3]; p < 0.001), better baseline episodic memory (β [SE] = 0.17 [0.06]; p = 0.002) and perceptual speed (β [SE] = 0.14 [0.06]; p = 0.024), worse baseline visuospatial ability in females (β [SE] = 0.35 [0.06]; p < 0.001), steeper cognitive decline, higher global AD pathology score (β [SE] = 0.11 [0.03]; p < 0.001), higher neurofibrillary tangle score (β [SE] = 0.38 [0.09]; p < 0.001), and more severe arteriolosclerosis (β [SE] = 0.15 [0.07]; p = 0.043).
  • Among 10,030 quality-controlled proteins, 1467 showed sex-differentiated expression at FDR < 5%; 41% had higher expression in males and 59% in females.
  • Joint proteome-wide differential expression identified 1228 proteins for AD dementia, 1183 for amyloid beta, 1309 for tangles, and 2325 for global cognitive trajectory at FDR < 0.05. Sex-stratified analyses found, for example, 869 female and 68 male proteins for AD versus control, with 35 significant in both; and 1579 female and 538 male proteins for global cognitive trajectory, with 393 significant in both.
  • Ten proteins had significant sex-by-trait interactions: MARCKS for AD clinical diagnosis; TOGARAM1, PLCD3, and SLC22A5 for episodic memory trajectory; DCUN1D5, S100A12, and TRIM46 for semantic memory trajectory; MTFR1L for working memory trajectory; PANK4 for global AD pathology; and SOS1 for cerebral amyloid angiopathy. These remained significant after sensitivity adjustment for diabetes and hypertension.

Methods

  • Participants were from the Religious Orders Study (ROS) and Rush Memory and Aging Project (MAP): 770 donors (66.2% female), all of European ancestry, mean age at death 89.4 years, with deep brain proteomes from the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.
  • Proteins were quantified by isobaric tandem mass tag (TMT) labeling, high pH fractionation, liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry, and search against the human UniProt database; after quality control, 10,030 proteins were analyzed.
  • Analyses used linear regression for protein–trait associations, surrogate variable analysis (SVA) for hidden factors, joint and sex-stratified models, sex-by-trait interaction tests, functional enrichment with clusterProfiler, and replication rate (π1) estimates between sex-stratified analyses.

Limitations

  • The paper states the study is cross-sectional, so causal relationships between proteins and AD cannot be inferred.
  • The paper states that few proteins showed significant sex-by-trait interactions, possibly reflecting limited statistical power; meta-analysis across cohorts may be needed.
  • The paper states the study focused on DLPFC tissue and was based on self-identified white participants, limiting generalizability; the text also makes evident that all participants were of European ancestry and the sample was older, which further constrains generalization to other populations and brain regions.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/alz.70206

Cites

86 of 86 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

79 of 93 cited sources checked · 49 supported · 1 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    Estrogen receptor expression has stronger associations with AD cognitive and pathologic traits in females than males.

    “Expression of the estrogen receptor had stronger associations with AD cognitive and pathologic traits in females than males.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [16] Oveisgharan S, Yang J, Yu L, et al. Estrogen receptor genes, cognitive decline, and Alzheimer disease. Neurology. 2023; 100(14): e1474‐ e1487. 36697247 PMC10104608 source
  • Premisecitation

    NRN1 is associated with a slower rate of cognitive decline independent of AD and related dementia pathologies.

    “consistent with prior studies indicating its association with a slower rate of cognitive decline independent of AD and related dementia pathologies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [49] Yu L, Tasaki S, Schneider JA, et al. Cortical Proteins associated with cognitive resilience in community‐dwelling older persons. JAMA Psychiatry. 2020; 77(11): 1172‐ 1180. 32609320 PMC7330835 source
    • cites [50] Zammit AR, Klein H‐U, Yu L, et al. Proteome‐wide analyses identified cortical proteins associated with resilience for varied cognitive abilities. Neurology. 2024; 102(1): e207816. 38165375 PMC10834136 source
  • Premisecitation

    Transcriptome-wide sex differences in AD have been characterized in multiple studies.

    “While transcriptome‐wide sex differences in AD have been characterized in multiple studies, 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 proteome‐wide sex differences in AD remain underexplored.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [15] Sun LL, Yang SL, Sun H, Li WD, Duan SR. Molecular differences in Alzheimer's disease between male and female patients determined by integrative network analysis. J Cell Mol Med. 2019; 23(1): 47‐ 58. 30394676 PMC6307813 source
    • cites [16] Oveisgharan S, Yang J, Yu L, et al. Estrogen receptor genes, cognitive decline, and Alzheimer disease. Neurology. 2023; 100(14): e1474‐ e1487. 36697247 PMC10104608 source

      The RNA Expression Processing section describes transcriptome-scale sequencing, and the Discussion reports different associations between estrogen-receptor molecular variants and AD traits in women and men. But the analyses focus on selected estrogen-receptor genes and their pathways; this paper does not characterize transcriptome-wide sex differences in AD. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [17] Paranjpe MD, Belonwu S, Wang JK, et al. Sex‐specific cross tissue meta‐analysis identifies immune dysregulation in women with Alzheimer's disease. Front Aging Neurosci. 2021; 13: 735611. 34658838 PMC8515049 source
  • Premisecitation

    The phosphorylation level of MARCKS is associated with Aβ biogenesis and neuron degeneration.

    “MARCKS is the main substrate for PKC, and the phosphorylation level of MARCKS is associated with Aβ biogenesis and neuron degeneration. 53 , 54 , 73”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [53] Chen Z, Zhang W, Selmi C, et al. The myristoylated alanine‐rich C‐kinase Substrates (MARCKS): a membrane‐anchored mediator of the cell function. Autoimmun Rev. 2021; 20(11): 102942. 34509657 PMC9746065 source

      The ‘MARCKS and neurological disorders’ section links MARCKS phosphorylation to early neuronal degeneration in Alzheimer’s disease. It also describes MARCKS as a modulator of amyloid-β peptide production, but does not link the level of MARCKS phosphorylation to that production. The ‘General terms of MARCKS’ section says phosphorylation precedes Aβ aggregation, which is distinct from Aβ biogenesis; page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [54] Fujita K, Motoki K, Tagawa K, et al. HMGB1, a pathogenic molecule that induces neurite degeneration via TLR4‐MARCKS, is a potential therapeutic target for Alzheimer's Disease. Sci Rep. 2016; 6: 31895. 27557632 PMC4997258 source

      The Results sections on MARCKS phosphorylation report that phosphorylated MARCKS is found near Aβ aggregates and that phosphorylation-mimicking mutants reduce neurite length and spine density in mouse neurons (page numbers unavailable). The paper supports an association with neurite degeneration, but it does not establish an association between MARCKS phosphorylation and Aβ biogenesis; its Aβ findings concern accumulation and aggregation. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [73] Su R, Han Z‐Y, Fan Ji‐P, Zhang Y‐L. A possible role of myristoylated alanine‐rich c kinase substrate in endocytic pathway of Alzheimer's disease. Neurosci Bull. 2010; 26(4): 338‐ 344. 20651816 PMC5552570 source

      Section 6 says PKC phosphorylation causes MARCKS to move from the membrane, and the figure in Section 8 proposes that this movement can promote endocytosis and Aβ production. The paper does not establish an association between MARCKS phosphorylation levels and neuronal degeneration; its proposed link to Aβ production is also not a measured association. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    PKC substrates make up over half of the core molecules in AD.

    “Studies have shown that PKC is one of the key kinases activated in AD, and PKC substrates make up over half of the core molecules in AD. 75 , 76”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [75] Morshed N, Lee MJ, Rodriguez FH, Lauffenburger DA, Mastroeni D, White FM. Quantitative phosphoproteomics uncovers dysregulated kinase networks in Alzheimer's Disease. Nat Aging. 2021; 1(6): 550‐ 565. 37117831 source

      In “AD kinase networks overlap with substrate and mouse model phosphoproteomes” (page unavailable), the paper reports that PKCA-regulated phosphosites are associated with AD-related cluster centroids. It does not say that PKC substrates constitute over half of any set of “core molecules” in AD; the proportion and category are unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.79)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [76] Tagawa K, Homma H, Saito A, et al. Comprehensive phosphoproteome analysis unravels the core signaling network that initiates the earliest synapse pathology in preclinical Alzheimer's disease brain. Hum Mol Genet. 2015; 24(2): 540‐ 558. 25231903 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 44
  • May combine two claims. 36
  • Not yet classified. 1
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    An integrated proteomic and metabolomic study of 43 hippocampal samples identified significant sex differences in insulin signaling and serine metabolism.

    “An integrated proteomic and metabolomic study of 43 hippocampal samples identified significant sex differences in insulin signaling and serine metabolism.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [23] Mangold CA, Wronowski B, Du M, et al. Sexually divergent induction of microglial‐associated neuroinflammation with hippocampal aging. J Neuroinflammation. 2017; 14(1): 141. 28732515 PMC5521082 source

      The Methods (Microarray analysis; page unavailable) describe transcriptomic microarray analysis of 24 mouse hippocampal samples, not an integrated proteomic and metabolomic study of 43 samples. The Results (Sex differences in hippocampal gene expression across the lifespan; page unavailable) report sex differences chiefly in inflammatory and microglial gene expression, not the claimed insulin-signaling and serine-metabolism findings. (LLM, conf=0.90)

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Prior work examined the effect of biological sex on protein expression and its genetic regulation in human brain proteomes.

    “Our prior work examined the effect of biological sex on protein expression and its genetic regulation in human brain proteomes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [24] Wingo AP, Liu Y, Gerasimov ES, et al. Sex differences in brain protein expression and disease. Nat Med. 2023; 29(9): 2224‐ 2232. 37653343 PMC10504083 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Sex differences have been observed in the progression, diagnosis, and clinical presentations of AD.

    “Despite the mixed findings from these incidence studies, sex differences have been observed in the progression, diagnosis, and clinical presentations of AD.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [12] Mielke MM, Vemuri P, Rocca WA. Clinical epidemiology of Alzheimer's disease: assessing sex and gender differences. Clin Epidemiol. 2014; 6: 37‐ 48. 24470773 PMC3891487 source
    • cites [13] Nebel RA, Aggarwal NT, Barnes LL, et al. Understanding the impact of sex and gender in Alzheimer's disease: a call to action. Alzheimers Dement. 2018; 14(9): 1171‐ 1183. 29907423 PMC6400070 source
    • cites [14] Ferretti MT, Iulita MF, Cavedo E, et al. Sex differences in Alzheimer disease—the gateway to precision medicine. Nat Rev Neurol. 2018; 14(8): 457‐ 469. 29985474 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Estrogen-related receptor beta is differentially expressed between male and female AD across four brain regions.

    “For instance, estrogen‐related receptor beta was found to be differentially expressed between male and female AD across four brain regions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [15] Sun LL, Yang SL, Sun H, Li WD, Duan SR. Molecular differences in Alzheimer's disease between male and female patients determined by integrative network analysis. J Cell Mol Med. 2019; 23(1): 47‐ 58. 30394676 PMC6307813 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Female-specific pathways are enriched in immune response, insulin signaling, and tau phosphorylation.

    “Female‐specific pathways were found to be enriched in immune response, 17 , 18 , 19 insulin signaling, 20 , 21 and tau phosphorylation, 22”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [17] Paranjpe MD, Belonwu S, Wang JK, et al. Sex‐specific cross tissue meta‐analysis identifies immune dysregulation in women with Alzheimer's disease. Front Aging Neurosci. 2021; 13: 735611. 34658838 PMC8515049 source
    • cites [20] Santiago JA, Quinn JP, Potashkin JA. Sex‐specific transcriptional rewiring in the brain of Alzheimer's disease patients. Front Aging Neurosci. 2022; 14: 1009368. 36389068 PMC9659968 source
    • cites [22] Cáceres A, González JR. Female‐specific risk of Alzheimer's disease is associated with tau phosphorylation processes: a transcriptome‐wide interaction analysis. Neurobiol Aging. 2020; 96: 104‐ 108. 32977080 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Male-specific pathways are linked to nicotine addiction, adipocytokine signaling, and alcoholism.

    “while male‐specific pathways were linked to nicotine addiction, adipocytokine signaling, and alcoholism. 20”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [20] Santiago JA, Quinn JP, Potashkin JA. Sex‐specific transcriptional rewiring in the brain of Alzheimer's disease patients. Front Aging Neurosci. 2022; 14: 1009368. 36389068 PMC9659968 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Females account for two-thirds of AD patients and have a higher lifetime risk of developing AD than males.

    “Females account for two‐thirds of AD patients and experience a higher lifetime risk of developing AD compared to males.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [1] 2024 Alzheimer's Disease Facts and Figures. Alzheimers Dement, 2024. 20(5): 3708‐ 3821. 38689398 PMC11095490 source

      The Prevalence section reports that almost two-thirds of Americans with Alzheimer’s are women and estimates a higher lifetime risk for women than men using Framingham Heart Study data. The citing sentence presents these U.S.-based figures without a geographic qualifier; the paper does not establish them for all AD patients worldwide. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The DLPFC controls working memory and executive function and is a key neocortical region affected in AD.

    “The DLPFC controls working memory and executive function and is a key neocortical region affected in AD.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [27] Blumenfeld RS, Ranganath C. Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex promotes long‐term memory formation through its role in working memory organization. J Neurosci. 2006; 26(3): 916‐ 925. 16421311 PMC6675388 source

      The Introduction and fMRI results link the DLPFC to organizing information in working memory, supporting its role in working-memory control. Our copy does not establish that it is a key neocortical region affected in Alzheimer’s disease (AD); a search for AD-related passages found none. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [28] De Jager PL, Ma Y, Mccabe C, et al. A multi‐omic atlas of the human frontal cortex for aging and Alzheimer's disease research. Sci Data. 2018; 5: 180142. 30084846 PMC6080491 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    These findings are in line with prior work showing robust differences in brain protein expression by sex.

    “These findings are in line with our prior work showing robust differences in brain protein expression by sex.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [24] Wingo AP, Liu Y, Gerasimov ES, et al. Sex differences in brain protein expression and disease. Nat Med. 2023; 29(9): 2224‐ 2232. 37653343 PMC10504083 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    MDK, SMOC1, and NTN1 have been shown to colocalize with Aβ plaque and are promising biomarkers associated with AD pathology.

    “These proteins have been shown to colocalize with Aβ plaque and are promising biomarkers associated with AD pathology.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [43] Johnson ECB, Carter EK, Dammer EB, et al. Large‐scale deep multi‐layer analysis of Alzheimer's disease brain reveals strong proteomic disease‐related changes not observed at the RNA Level. Nat Neurosci. 2022; 25(2): 213‐ 225. 35115731 PMC8825285 source

      The Results section (‘Modules Enriched in Proteins Co-localized with Plaques and Tangles’; page unavailable) names SMOC1, MDK and NTN1 as possible plaque-associated proteins and reports MDK staining consistent with plaque co-localization. It does not establish co-localization for all three individually. The Discussion (page unavailable) says proteins in their module may be promising AD biofluid biomarkers, citing elevated SMOC1 in AD cerebrospinal fluid. (LLM, conf=0.83)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [51] Bai B, Wang X, Li Y, et al. Deep multilayer brain proteomics identifies molecular networks in Alzheimer's disease progression. Neuron. 2020; 105(6): 975‐991 e7. 31926610 PMC7318843 source

      The Results section on amyloid plaque pathology reports that MDK and NTN1 are highly colocalized with Aβ plaques, while SMOC1 is partially colocalized. The Results section on CSF proteomics identifies SMOC1 among proteins changed in AD cerebrospinal fluid, but does not establish MDK or NTN1 as biomarker candidates. Thus the colocalization claim is supported, but calling all three promising biomarkers goes beyond the evidence in our copy. Page numbers are unavailable. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [52] Zhou M, Haque RU, Dammer EB, et al. Targeted mass spectrometry to quantify brain‐derived cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers in Alzheimer's disease. Clin Proteomics. 2020; 17: 19. 32514259 PMC7257173 source

      The Results and Discussion identify SMOC1 as a promising CSF biomarker associated with AD pathology. Our copy does not report that SMOC1 colocalizes with Aβ plaques, or establish the stated findings for MDK and NTN1 (searched: colocalization, plaques, MDK, and NTN1). (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    MARCKS is a cellular substrate for protein kinase C (PKC).

    “MARCKS is a cellular substrate for protein kinase C (PKC) (Figure S5) and the phosphorylation level of MARCKS is associated with AD. 53 , 54”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [53] Chen Z, Zhang W, Selmi C, et al. The myristoylated alanine‐rich C‐kinase Substrates (MARCKS): a membrane‐anchored mediator of the cell function. Autoimmun Rev. 2021; 20(11): 102942. 34509657 PMC9746065 source
    • cites [54] Fujita K, Motoki K, Tagawa K, et al. HMGB1, a pathogenic molecule that induces neurite degeneration via TLR4‐MARCKS, is a potential therapeutic target for Alzheimer's Disease. Sci Rep. 2016; 6: 31895. 27557632 PMC4997258 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    TRIM46 is associated with proper microtubule functions.

    “Among these proteins, TOGARAM1 and TRIM46 are associated with proper microtubule functions, 55 , 56 and MTFR1L is associated with mitochondrial fusion processes. 57”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [55] Latour BL, et al. Dysfunction of the Ciliary ARMC9/TOGARAM1 protein module causes Joubert Syndrome. J Clin Invest. 2020; 130(8): 4423‐ 4439. 32453716 PMC7410078 source

      The paper’s discussion of ciliary microtubules and tubulin modifications concerns ARMC9 and TOGARAM1, not TRIM46. A search of our full-text copy for “TRIM46” and “TRIM46 microtubule functions” found no passage addressing TRIM46’s role; page numbers were not available for the indexed passages. (LLM, conf=0.72)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [56] van Beuningen SFB, et al. TRIM46 controls neuronal polarity and axon specification by driving the formation of parallel microtubule arrays. Neuron. 2015; 88(6): 1208‐ 1226. 26671463 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The phosphorylation level of MARCKS is associated with AD.

    “MARCKS is a cellular substrate for protein kinase C (PKC) (Figure S5) and the phosphorylation level of MARCKS is associated with AD. 53 , 54”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [53] Chen Z, Zhang W, Selmi C, et al. The myristoylated alanine‐rich C‐kinase Substrates (MARCKS): a membrane‐anchored mediator of the cell function. Autoimmun Rev. 2021; 20(11): 102942. 34509657 PMC9746065 source
    • cites [54] Fujita K, Motoki K, Tagawa K, et al. HMGB1, a pathogenic molecule that induces neurite degeneration via TLR4‐MARCKS, is a potential therapeutic target for Alzheimer's Disease. Sci Rep. 2016; 6: 31895. 27557632 PMC4997258 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    TOGARAM1 is associated with proper microtubule functions.

    “Among these proteins, TOGARAM1 and TRIM46 are associated with proper microtubule functions, 55 , 56 and MTFR1L is associated with mitochondrial fusion processes. 57”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [55] Latour BL, et al. Dysfunction of the Ciliary ARMC9/TOGARAM1 protein module causes Joubert Syndrome. J Clin Invest. 2020; 130(8): 4423‐ 4439. 32453716 PMC7410078 source
    • cites [56] van Beuningen SFB, et al. TRIM46 controls neuronal polarity and axon specification by driving the formation of parallel microtubule arrays. Neuron. 2015; 88(6): 1208‐ 1226. 26671463 source

      The section on parallel microtubule organization in the proximal axon describes TRIM46’s role in microtubule organization, not TOGARAM1’s. Searches of our copy for “TOGARAM1” and its expanded name found no passage addressing TOGARAM1’s function, so this source does not verify the specific claim attributed to it. (LLM, conf=0.74)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Functional enrichment used all quality-control-passed proteins as the background set and Benjamini-Hochberg FDR correction.

    “All proteins that passed the quality control (n = 10,030) were used as the background set. The z‐score was used to determine overrepresentation of ontologies and one‐sided Fisher's exact test (Benjamini–Hochberg false discover rate [FDR] corrected) was used to assess the significance of the z‐score.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [46] Yu G, Wang L‐G, Han Y, He Q‐Y. clusterProfiler: an R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. OMICS. 2012; 16(5): 284‐ 287. 22455463 PMC3339379 source

      The Materials and Methods section describes functional enrichment tests and FDR control, but specifies Storey q-values rather than Benjamini–Hochberg correction. It does not say that quality-control-passed proteins were used as the background set; the Results instead describe an example analysis of gene clusters. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    Surrogate variable analysis was used to detect hidden technical or biological factors that may influence brain protein expression, and significant surrogate variables were adjusted for as covariates.

    “The surrogate variable analysis (SVA) method in the sva R package (version 3.52.0) 45 was used to detect potentially hidden variables that may influence brain protein expression.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [45] Leek JT, Johnson WE, Parker HS, Jaffe AE, Storey JD. The sva Package for removing batch effects and other unwanted variation in high‐throughput experiments. Bioinformatics. 2012; 28(6): 882‐ 883. 22257669 PMC3307112 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    SLC22A5 is a carnitine transporter involved in neurotransmitter synthesis.

    “SLC22A5 is a carnitine transporter involved in neurotransmitter synthesis, and expression of SLC22A5 is regulated by estrogen receptors. 62”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [62] Wang C, Uray IP, Mazumdar A, Mayer JA, Brown PH. SLC22A5/OCTN2 expression in breast cancer is induced by estrogen via a novel intronic estrogen‐response element (ERE). Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012; 134(1): 101‐ 115. 22212555 PMC3416040 source

      The Results section identifies SLC22A5 as a carnitine transporter, and the Abstract reports that estrogen stimulates its expression in an estrogen receptor-dependent manner. The paper discusses carnitine transport and lipid metabolism, but does not support the attributed involvement in neurotransmitter synthesis; a search for that phrase found no relevant passage. Page numbers were not provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.90)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    DCUN1D5 is involved in the neddylation pathway that regulates protein homeostasis.

    “DCUN1D5 is involved in the neddylation pathway that regulates protein homeostasis, 58 and S100A12 is a pro‐inflammatory mediator that modulates neuroinflammation. 59”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [58] Zhang S, Yu Q, Li Z, Zhao Y, Sun Y. Protein neddylation and its role in health and diseases. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2024; 9(1): 85. 38575611 PMC10995212 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    PLCD3 is a phospholipase C (PLC) isozyme activated by G protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER) and is involved in phosphoinositide turnover and PKC activation.

    “PLCD3 is a phospholipase C (PLC) isozyme activated by G protein‐coupled estrogen receptor (GPER) and is involved in phosphoinositide turnover and protein kinase C (PKC) activation. 60 , 61”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [60] Roque C, Mendes‐Oliveira J, Duarte‐Chendo C, Baltazar G. The Role of G protein‐coupled estrogen receptor 1 on neurological disorders. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2019; 55: 100786. 31513775 source
    • cites [61] Prossnitz ER, Barton M. The G protein‐coupled oestrogen receptor GPER in health and disease: an update. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2023; 19(7): 407‐ 424. 37193881 PMC10187525 source

      The Molecular signalling mediated by GPER section (page unavailable) describes a GPER-initiated PLCβ–PKC pathway and PKC activation following calcium mobilization. It does not identify PLCD3 as the PLC isozyme activated by GPER or describe PLCD3-mediated phosphoinositide turnover. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    PANK4 is one of the pantothenate kinase isozymes implicated in coenzyme A biosynthesis.

    “Of these two proteins, PANK4 showed a sex‐biased association with global AD pathology and is one of the pantothenate kinase isozymes implicated in coenzyme A biosynthesis. 63”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [63] Munshi MI, Yao SJ, Ben Mamoun C. Redesigning therapies for pantothenate kinase‐associated neurodegeneration. J Biol Chem. 2022; 298(3): 101577. 35041826 PMC8861153 source

      The Models of PKAN section identifies PANK4 as one of four human PANK-like genes, and the therapeutic-strategies section describes how its activity may affect the availability of CoA precursors. But the paper distinguishes PANK4 from the three active pantothenate kinases: it lacks the residues required for kinase activity and instead has phosphatase activity. Calling it a pantothenate kinase isozyme therefore overstates the source. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    MTFR1L is associated with mitochondrial fusion processes.

    “Among these proteins, TOGARAM1 and TRIM46 are associated with proper microtubule functions, 55 , 56 and MTFR1L is associated with mitochondrial fusion processes. 57”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [57] Tilokani L, Russell FM, Hamilton S, et al. AMPK‐dependent phosphorylation of MTFR1L regulates mitochondrial morphology. Sci Adv. 2022; 8(45): eabo7956. 36367943 PMC9651865 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    PLCD3 is a phospholipase C (PLC) isozyme activated by G protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER).

    “Both PLCD3 and SLC22A5 are associated with estrogen‐related signaling pathways (Figure S5), with PLCD3 being a phospholipase C (PLC) isozyme activated by G protein‐coupled estrogen receptor (GPER) 60 , 61 and SLC22A5 being a carnitine transport protein transcriptionally regulated by estrogen receptors. 62”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [60] Roque C, Mendes‐Oliveira J, Duarte‐Chendo C, Baltazar G. The Role of G protein‐coupled estrogen receptor 1 on neurological disorders. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2019; 55: 100786. 31513775 source
    • cites [61] Prossnitz ER, Barton M. The G protein‐coupled oestrogen receptor GPER in health and disease: an update. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2023; 19(7): 407‐ 424. 37193881 PMC10187525 source

      The ‘Molecular signalling mediated by GPER’ section describes GPER signalling through a PLCβ–PKC pathway, supporting a connection between GPER and a phospholipase C isozyme. It does not identify PLCD3 or say that GPER activates PLCD3 specifically; the named isozyme is PLCβ. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    PLCD is highly expressed in the brain and has been associated with AD and neurodegenerative diseases.

    “PLCD is highly expressed in the brain and has been associated with AD and neurodegenerative diseases. 72”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [72] Lim K‐H, Yang S, Kim S‐H, Ko E, Kang M, Joo J‐Y. Cryptic mutations of PLC family members in brain disorders: recent discoveries and a deep‐learning‐based Approach. Brain. 2023; 146(4): 1267‐ 1280. 36448305 PMC10115239 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    SOS1 is a guanine nucleotide exchange factor that activates the RAS signaling cascade.

    “SOS1 showed a significant sex interaction with CAA and is a guanine nucleotide exchange factor that activates the RAS signaling cascade. 64”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [64] Baltanás FC, Zarich N, Rojas‐Cabañeros JM, Santos E. SOS GEFs in health and disease. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer. 2020; 1874(2): 188445. 33035641 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    S100A12 is a pro-inflammatory protein localized within Aβ plaques.

    “For instance, S100A12 is a pro‐inflammatory protein localized within Aβ plaques. 59 , 77”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [59] Shepherd CE, Goyette J, Utter V, et al. Inflammatory S100A9 and S100A12 proteins in Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2006; 27(11): 1554‐ 1563. 16253391 source
    • cites [77] Cristóvão JS, Gomes CM. S100 proteins in Alzheimer's disease. Front Neurosci. 2019; 13: 463. 31156365 PMC6532343 source

      The S100A12 section reports S100A12 hexamers associated with senile plaques in AD brains, and the Outlook says S100A12 is found within amyloid plaques. The S100 Protein Family section describes pro-inflammatory activity for some S100 proteins, but the copy does not establish that activity specifically for S100A12. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Females with MCI or AD dementia show greater cognitive decline and are outperformed by males in several cognitive domains.

    “Research has shown that females with MCI or AD dementia shows greater cognitive decline and are outperformed by males in several cognitive domains. 68 , 69”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [68] Sohn D, Shpanskaya K, Lucas JE, et al. Sex differences in cognitive decline in subjects with high likelihood of mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's disease. Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1): 7490. 29748598 PMC5945611 source

      The Results section reports significantly greater ADAS-Cog11 worsening in females than males with a high likelihood of MCI due to AD. The Introduction describes faster decline after MCI or AD onset as emerging evidence, but this study did not examine AD dementia. The Discussion says other cognitive domains still need examination, so it does not establish that males outperform females in several domains. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [69] Laws KR, Irvine K, Gale TM. Sex differences in cognitive impairment in Alzheimer's disease. World J Psychiatry. 2016; 6(1): 54‐ 65. 27014598 PMC4804268 source

      The Conclusion (page not provided) says men with AD outperform women across multiple cognitive domains, and a later passage says female patients with MCI show increased vulnerability to cognitive impairment earlier in the illness. But the Conclusion describes evidence that females deteriorate faster as limited and calls for longitudinal studies; the claim presents greater cognitive decline across MCI or AD dementia more definitively than the review does. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    SLC22A5 is a carnitine transport protein transcriptionally regulated by estrogen receptors.

    “Both PLCD3 and SLC22A5 are associated with estrogen‐related signaling pathways (Figure S5), with PLCD3 being a phospholipase C (PLC) isozyme activated by G protein‐coupled estrogen receptor (GPER) 60 , 61 and SLC22A5 being a carnitine transport protein transcriptionally regulated by estrogen receptors. 62”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [62] Wang C, Uray IP, Mazumdar A, Mayer JA, Brown PH. SLC22A5/OCTN2 expression in breast cancer is induced by estrogen via a novel intronic estrogen‐response element (ERE). Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012; 134(1): 101‐ 115. 22212555 PMC3416040 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    SOS1 activates the RAS signaling pathway.

    “SOS1 activates the RAS signaling pathway, and its expression level is elevated in the blood of AD patients. 78”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [78] Sim K‐Y, Park S‐H, Choi KY, et al. High‐throughput epitope profiling of antibodies in the plasma of Alzheimer's disease patients using random peptide microarrays. Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1): 4587. 30872784 PMC6418098 source

      The Discussion and Table 2 report increased SOS1 expression in pyramidal neurons of AD patients, not in their blood. The Discussion mentions RAS only as the renin–angiotensin signalling pathway; it does not say that SOS1 activates it or another RAS pathway. The Results identify SOS1 as a potential target of antibodies upregulated in plasma, which is not a measurement of blood SOS1 expression. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Sex differences in mitochondrial metabolism have been reported in AD.

    “Although sex differences in immune response 17 , 18 , 19 and mitochondrial metabolism 79 have been reported in AD, other molecular processes identified here remain understudied.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [79] Zhao L, Mao Z, Woody SK, Brinton RD. Sex differences in metabolic aging of the brain: insights into female susceptibility to Alzheimer's Disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2016; 42: 69‐ 79. 27143423 PMC5644989 source

      The Results report sex differences in age-related expression of genes involved in energy metabolism, including mitochondrial electron transport and oxidative phosphorylation. But the Abstract and Discussion describe measurements in aging mice relevant to preclinical AD risk, not mitochondrial metabolism measured in people with AD; “in AD” extends the finding beyond the studied population and condition. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Sex differences in immune response have been reported in AD.

    “Although sex differences in immune response 17 , 18 , 19 and mitochondrial metabolism 79 have been reported in AD, other molecular processes identified here remain understudied.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [17] Paranjpe MD, Belonwu S, Wang JK, et al. Sex‐specific cross tissue meta‐analysis identifies immune dysregulation in women with Alzheimer's disease. Front Aging Neurosci. 2021; 13: 735611. 34658838 PMC8515049 source
    • cites [18] Brooks LRK, Mias GI. Data‐driven analysis of age, sex, and tissue effects on gene expression variability in Alzheimer's Disease. Front Neurosci. 2019; 13: 392. 31068785 PMC6491842 source

      Results §3.3 reports a significant sex-by-disease interaction for CXCR4, and Discussion §4.2 identifies it as a chemokine receptor involved in inflammatory and neuroinflammatory signaling. This supports a sex difference in an immune-related gene in AD, but the paper does not directly establish a sex difference in immune response more broadly. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [19] Barber AJ, Del Genio CL, Swain AB, et al. Age, Sex and Alzheimer's Disease: a Longitudinal Study of 3xTg‐AD mice reveals sex‐specific disease trajectories and inflammatory responses mirrored in postmortem brains from Alzheimer's patients. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2024; 16(1): 134. 38909241 PMC11193202 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    MTFR1L is associated with mitochondrial metabolism.

    “Both MTFR1L and PANK4 are associated with mitochondrial metabolism, with MTFR1L implicated in mitochondrial fusion process 57 and PANK4 involved in coenzyme A biosynthesis. 63”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [57] Tilokani L, Russell FM, Hamilton S, et al. AMPK‐dependent phosphorylation of MTFR1L regulates mitochondrial morphology. Sci Adv. 2022; 8(45): eabo7956. 36367943 PMC9651865 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    PANK4 is associated with mitochondrial metabolism.

    “Both MTFR1L and PANK4 are associated with mitochondrial metabolism, with MTFR1L implicated in mitochondrial fusion process 57 and PANK4 involved in coenzyme A biosynthesis. 63”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [63] Munshi MI, Yao SJ, Ben Mamoun C. Redesigning therapies for pantothenate kinase‐associated neurodegeneration. J Biol Chem. 2022; 298(3): 101577. 35041826 PMC8861153 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    DCUN1D5 regulates the protein neddylation pathway that has been linked to AD.

    “Moreover, TRIM46 and TOGARAM1 are proteins that play roles in microtubule functions, 55 , 56 and DCUN1D5 regulates the protein neddylation pathway that has been linked to AD. 58”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [58] Zhang S, Yu Q, Li Z, Zhao Y, Sun Y. Protein neddylation and its role in health and diseases. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2024; 9(1): 85. 38575611 PMC10995212 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    SOS1 expression level is elevated in the blood of AD patients.

    “SOS1 activates the RAS signaling pathway, and its expression level is elevated in the blood of AD patients. 78”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [78] Sim K‐Y, Park S‐H, Choi KY, et al. High‐throughput epitope profiling of antibodies in the plasma of Alzheimer's disease patients using random peptide microarrays. Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1): 4587. 30872784 PMC6418098 source

      The Discussion reports increased SOS1 expression in pyramidal neurons of AD patients, not in their blood. The Results identify SOS1 as a potential target of upregulated antibodies in plasma; they do not report elevated blood SOS1 expression. The cited passages also do not establish that SOS1 activates RAS signaling. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    SMOC1, NTN1, and MDK are strongly associated with amyloid plaques and are considered hub proteins in both AsymAD and AD.

    “These proteins are strongly associated with amyloid plaques and are considered hub proteins in both AsymAD and AD. 43 , 51 , 80”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [43] Johnson ECB, Carter EK, Dammer EB, et al. Large‐scale deep multi‐layer analysis of Alzheimer's disease brain reveals strong proteomic disease‐related changes not observed at the RNA Level. Nat Neurosci. 2022; 25(2): 213‐ 225. 35115731 PMC8825285 source

      The Results section on plaque- and tangle-associated modules identifies SMOC1, NTN1, and MDK as plaque-associated proteins, and the Discussion says they correlate with Aβ. Extended Data calls MDK a hub protein of the M42 module, which the Results report is elevated in both AsymAD and AD. Our copy does not identify all three proteins as hubs in both conditions. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [51] Bai B, Wang X, Li Y, et al. Deep multilayer brain proteomics identifies molecular networks in Alzheimer's disease progression. Neuron. 2020; 105(6): 975‐991 e7. 31926610 PMC7318843 source

      The Results section, “Pathway Ranking and Top-ranked Proteins in Amyloid Plaque Pathology” (page unavailable), reports plaque accumulation of MDK, NTN1, and SMOC1 in AD; MDK and NTN1 were highly colocalized with plaques, while SMOC1 was only partially colocalized. The cited passages do not establish that all three are hub proteins in both asymptomatic AD (AsymAD) and AD. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [80] Higginbotham L, Ping L, Dammer EB, et al. Integrated proteomics reveals brain‐based cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers in asymptomatic and symptomatic Alzheimer's disease. Sci Adv. 2020; 6(43). PMC7577712 33087358 source

      The Results sections ‘Disease-related brain modules are preserved in AsymAD’ and ‘Overlap between brain protein and RNA networks’ report changes in SMOC1 and MDK in AsymAD and AD, and describe strong amyloid-plaque associations as a likely explanation for changes that include NTN1 and MDK. They do not identify the three proteins as hub proteins in both conditions, establish a plaque association for SMOC1, or specifically report an AsymAD change for NTN1. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    CHRM3 is involved in the acetylcholine pathway.

    “Similarly, the muscarinic cholinergic receptor CHRM3, which is involved in the acetylcholine pathway, 84 was significantly upregulated in both AD and Lewy body pathology.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [84] Kruse AC, Kobilka BK, Gautam D, Sexton PM, Christopoulos A, Wess J. Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors: novel opportunities for drug development. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2014; 13(7): 549‐ 560. 24903776 PMC5818261 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Compared to male participants, female participants had an older age at death and received fewer years of education.

    “Compared to male participants, female participants had an older age at death (β [SE] = 2.8 [0.5]; p < 0.001) and received fewer years of education (β [SE] = −1.4 [0.3]; p < 0.001).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Not yet classified.

    Finding

    Downregulated proteins in AD were enriched for synaptic signaling, axon development, and actin filament organization.

    “The downregulated proteins in AD were enriched for synaptic signaling, axon development, and actin filament organization (Figure S1, Table S4).”
    Quote in the paperNot yet classified
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Females showed more severe arteriolosclerosis than males, while no significant sex differences were found in other age-related neuropathologic conditions.

    “For age‐related pathologies, females showed more severe arteriolosclerosis than males (β [SE] = 0.15 [0.07]; p = 0.043) while no significant sex differences were found in other age‐related neuropathologic conditions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    After quality control, 10,030 proteins were considered in the study.

    “After quality control, 10,030 proteins were considered in our study.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Among these proteins, 59% had higher abundance in cognitive stability and 41% had lower abundance in cognitive stability.

    “Among these proteins, 59% had higher abundance (i.e., positive betas) in cognitive stability, while 41% had lower abundance (i.e., negative betas) in cognitive stability (Figure 1B).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    There were no significant sex differences in cognitive diagnosis or APOE ε4 status.

    “There were no significant sex differences in cognitive diagnosis (p = 0.41) and APOE ε4 status (p = 0.90).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    All participants were of European ancestry, with an average age of 89.4 years at death and an average of 15.9 years of education.

    “All participants were of European ancestry, with an average age of 89.4 at death and an average of 15.9 years of education.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The study included 770 ROS/MAP participants with deep brain proteomic profiles, of whom 66.2% were female.

    “We examined brain proteomes profiled from the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex of 770 donors (66.2% female).”
    • Also stated in: § Study participants · plain
      “This study included 770 participants and their cognitive diagnosis at the time of death consisted of 33.4% no cognitive impairment (NCI), 26.9% mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and 39.7% AD dementia.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Of the 1467 sex-differentiated proteins, 41% had higher expression in males and 59% had higher expression in females.

    “Of these, 41% had higher expression in males and 59% had higher expression in females (Table S2).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Female participants had a higher global AD pathology score and a higher neurofibrillary tangle score than males after adjusting for education and age at death.

    “When comparing AD hallmark pathology by sex, female participants had a higher global AD pathology score (β [SE] = 0.11 [0.03]; p < 0.001) and a higher neurofibrillary tangle score (β [SE] = 0.38 [0.09]; p < 0.001) after adjusting for education and age at death.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Compared to males, females had lower cognitive scores at each assessment timepoint, indicating steeper rates of decline in global cognition and cognitive abilities.

    “Compared to male participants, female participants had lower cognitive scores at each assessment timepoint (i.e., negative time‐by‐sex interaction term), indicating steeper rates of decline in global cognition and cognitive abilities (Table S1).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Both female and male participants displayed significant declines in global cognition and different cognitive domains over time.

    “Both female and male participants displayed significant declines in global cognition and different cognitive domains over time.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    At baseline, females showed better episodic memory and perceptual speed, while males showed better visuospatial ability, after adjusting for age and education.

    “At baseline, female participants showed better performance in episodic memory (β [SE] = 0.17 [0.06]; p = 0.002) and perceptual speed (β [SE] = 0.14 [0.06]; p = 0.024), while male participants showed better baseline visuospatial ability (β [SE] = 0.35 [0.06]; p < 0.001) after adjusting for age and education (Table S1).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In the joint analysis of AD hallmark pathologies, 1183 proteins were associated with Aβ density, 1309 with tangle density, and 1924 with global AD pathology.

    “In the joint analysis of AD hallmark pathologies, 1183 proteins were found to be associated with Aβ density, 1309 with tangle density, and 1924 with global AD pathology (Table S12‐S14).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Joint analysis in different cognitive domains revealed 1976 differentially expressed proteins for episodic memory, 1576 for working memory, 1501 for semantic memory, 461 for perceptual speed, and four for visuospatial ability.

    “Joint analysis in different cognitive domains also revealed many differentially expressed proteins, with 1976 for episodic memory, 1576 for working memory, 1501 for semantic memory, 461 for perceptual speed, and four for visuospatial ability (Figure S2, Table S7‐S11).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Fewer proteins were associated with age-related pathologies: 98 with Lewy bodies, 67 with CAA, one with microinfarcts, and no associations with other neuropathologic conditions.

    “Fewer proteins were found to be associated with age‐related pathologies: 98 were associated with Lewy bodies, 67 with CAA, one with microinfarcts, and no associations observed with other neuropathologic conditions (Figure S2, Table S17‐S23).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The cognitive diagnosis at death consisted of 33.4% no cognitive impairment, 26.9% mild cognitive impairment, and 39.7% AD dementia.

    “This study included 770 participants and their cognitive diagnosis at the time of death consisted of 33.4% no cognitive impairment (NCI), 26.9% mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and 39.7% AD dementia.”
    • Also stated in: § Comparing AD and its endophenotypes between females and males · plain
      “The final cognitive diagnosis for these participants consisted of 39.7% AD dementia, 26.9% MCI, and 33.4% NCI.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Sex-stratified analyses between AD and control yielded 869 significant proteins in females and 68 in males at FDR < 5%, with 35 proteins significant in both analyses and displaying concordant direction of associations.

    “Sex‐stratified analyses between AD and control yielded 869 significant proteins in females and 68 in males at a FDR threshold of 5%, with 35 proteins significant in both analyses and displaying concordant direction of associations (Figure 2A, Table S3).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The replication rates for different cognitive abilities were 77% for episodic memory, 84% for working memory, and 56% for semantic memory.

    “The replication rates for different cognitive abilities were 77% for episodic memory, 84% for working memory, and 56% for semantic memory.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Diabetes and hypertension showed significant sex differences in our dataset.

    “To test whether comorbid medical conditions confound the moderating effects of sex on these phenotypic outcomes, we performed a sensitivity analysis by adjusting for the presence of diabetes and hypertension, both of which showed significant sex differences in our dataset (Table 1).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Multiple transcriptomic studies have identified potential molecular mechanisms underlying sex differences in AD.

    “Multiple transcriptomic studies have identified potential molecular mechanisms underlying sex differences in AD.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The data suggest the presence of sex differences in baseline cognitive performance, cognitive trajectories, and AD hallmark pathologies.

    “In summary, these data suggest the presence of sex differences in baseline cognitive performance, cognitive trajectories, and AD hallmark pathologies.”
    • Also stated in: § Highlights · plain
      “At the phenotypic level, we found sex differences in baseline cognitive performance, cognitive trajectories, and AD hallmark pathologies.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    The replication rate π1 was used to estimate consistency between sex-stratified analyses; π1 estimates the fraction of true signals and is less dependent on sample size and power.

    “To determine the consistency between proteins associated with each trait, we estimated the replication rate, π1, between the sex‐stratified analyses. π1 estimates the fraction of true signals, not just significance, which makes it less dependent on sample size and power 47 and helpful when the two analyses have different sample sizes (i.e., female dataset n = 510, male dataset n = 260).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [47] Storey JD. A direct approach to false discovery rates. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B‐Statistical Methodology. 2002; 64: 479‐ 498.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    Linear regression models for differential expression adjusted for age at death, education, cognitive diagnosis, and surrogate variables.

    “To identify proteins differentially expressed between females and males, we performed linear regression with protein abundance as the dependent variable (Y) and sex as the independent variable and covaried for age at death, education, cognitive diagnosis, and SVs.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Principal component analysis was used to remove samples with greater than four standard deviations from the mean of either the first or second principal component.

    “Principal component analysis was used to remove samples with greater than four standard deviations from the mean of either the first or second principal component.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductcitation

    Significant proteins in the larger discovery (female) dataset at FDR < 0.05 were selected from the replication (male) dataset to estimate π1 statistics.

    “Significant proteins in the larger discovery (female) dataset at FDR < 0.05 were selected from the replication (male) dataset to estimate the π1 statistics using the qvalue package (version 2.36.0). 48”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [48] Storey JD, Bass A, Dabney A, Robinson D. qvalue: Q‐value Estimation for False Discovery Rate Control. R package version 2.36.0; 2024. http://github.com/jdstorey/qvalue. Available from. source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    A final cognitive diagnosis was made at the time of death after review of all data blinded to neuropathology.

    “A final cognitive diagnosis is made at the time of death after review of all data blinded to neuropathology.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The effects of protein sequencing batch and post mortem interval were regressed out using linear regression.

    “We used linear regression to regress out the effect of protein sequencing batch and post mortem interval.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Proteins with TMT abundance values in at least 30% of samples were included in analyses.

    “Proteins with TMT abundance values in at least 30% of samples were included in our analyses.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    S100A12 is a pro-inflammatory mediator that modulates neuroinflammation.

    “DCUN1D5 is involved in the neddylation pathway that regulates protein homeostasis, 58 and S100A12 is a pro‐inflammatory mediator that modulates neuroinflammation. 59”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [59] Shepherd CE, Goyette J, Utter V, et al. Inflammatory S100A9 and S100A12 proteins in Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2006; 27(11): 1554‐ 1563. 16253391 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Our phenotypic analysis suggests the presence of sex differences in baseline cognitive performance and cognitive trajectories.

    “Our phenotypic analysis suggests the presence of sex differences in baseline cognitive performance and cognitive trajectories.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    We expect to be best powered to detect differences in proteins from neurons and glia, the major cell types in the gray matter that are also highly relevant for AD.

    “Notably, we expect to be best powered to detect differences in proteins from neurons and glia, the major cell types in the gray matter that are also highly relevant for AD.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The DLPFC has a relatively lower burden of AD pathology and neuronal loss, even among individuals with advanced AD or advanced age at death.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationown data

    The limited number of significant sex-by-trait interactions may imply a lack of statistical power.

    “Second, a limited number of proteins showed significant sex‐by‐trait interactions in our analysis, which may imply a lack of statistical power.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
69 of 69
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Proteome-wide sex differences in AD remain underexplored.

    “proteome‐wide sex differences in AD remain underexplored.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Other molecular processes identified here remain understudied.

    “other molecular processes identified here remain understudied.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The DLPFC has a relatively lower burden of AD pathology and neuronal loss, even among individuals with advanced AD or advanced age at death.

    “our study focused on tissue from the DLPFC, which was selected owing to the relatively lower burden of AD pathology and neuronal loss, even among individuals with advanced AD or advanced age at death of the participants.”
3 of 3

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Conflicting p values for sex difference in global AD pathology

    Minor

    The results text reports p < 0.001 for the sex difference in global AD pathology, while Table 1 reports p = 0.005 for that characteristic. Both values indicate significance, but they cannot both be the reported p value for the same comparison.

  • Claim of lower female scores at every assessment conflicts with baseline results

    Minor

    The claim that females had lower cognitive scores at each assessment timepoint includes baseline, yet the paper reports better female baseline performance in episodic memory and perceptual speed. A negative time-by-sex interaction indicates a difference in rates of change, not lower scores at every timepoint.

2 of 2

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mei, Z., Liu, J., Bennett, D. A., Seyfried, N., Wingo, A. P., & Wingo, T. S.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • University of California Davis Medical Center (US)
  • Rush University Medical Center (US)
  • Emory University (US)
  • Atlanta VA Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Wingo, Thomas S.
Venue
Alzheimer's & Dementia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2025-05
Volume
21
Issue
5
Pages
e70206-e70206
ISSN
  • 1552-5260 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5279
OpenAlex
W4410220219
Cited by
11
References
85
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 4
FWCI
5.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Alzheimer s & Dementia (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (I01 BX003853, IK4 BX005219, I01 BX005686)
  • National Institutes of Health (R01 AG075827, R01 AG072120, R01 AG079170, P30 AG072972, U01 AG088425, P30AG10161, P30AG72975, R01AG15819, R01AG17917, U01AG46152, U01AG61356)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, sex differences
MeSH terms
Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Brain, Female, Humans, Male, Sex Characteristics, Prefrontal Cortex, Proteome, Endophenotypes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-18.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-18.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review